Yes, I saw Walter McGill and the Creation Seventh Day Adventist Church Hoax Website first.
Talk:Creation Seventh Day Adventist Church - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
DD,
Good job. Well, I suppose that is the reason you posted the ugly one first. I guess drow57 is right--such a repulsive sort of character except when he makes a point.
Originally Posted by DaisyDay
Does anyone ever get you confused with Jack Chick?
Evidently; once in a great while, but he is 22 years older and a writer. I work in the healing arts. Glad he did not trademark the name.
Faithful living,
Pastor "Chick"
NIB: I noticed your Dan Murphy quote. Are you anti-denialist?
I don't believe God requires you to use the SDA name so I'm not particularly impressed with your notion that you are being imprisoned for the cause.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. dir="ltr">
I don't see how any African-American with any inkling of history can say that you don't have the right to live your life how you want to live your life.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. dir="ltr">
No one should be telling you who you should love, no one should be telling you who you should be spending the rest of your life with.
When we start talking about equality and everyone being treated equally I don't want to to know an African-American who will say everybody doesn't deserve equality
Good job. Well, I suppose that is the reason you posted the ugly one first.
No, that is not why. I posted your site only because you were unable to.
I guess drow57 is right--such a repulsive sort of character except when he makes a point.
I don't know him well enough to make out whether he is repulsive or not, but since you seem to know him, I'll take your word on it.
NIB: I noticed your Dan Murphy quote. Are you anti-denialist?
You'll have to say what you mean by "anti-denialist" before I can answer accurately.
__________________ - Daisy
If such people were amenable to facts, they would have gotten the point long ago...Whatever it is that is blocking the understanding of the "denialist", it is not access to facts or information. The blockage is most likely emotional, possibly based on fear, and one does not most effectively deal with emotional barriers by using facts as instruments of assault and battery. - Dan Murphy
You know your party is in trouble when people ask did the rape guy win, and you have to ask which one?
I don't believe God requires you to use the SDA name so I'm not particularly impressed with your notion that you are being imprisoned for the cause.
Thank you for your input. The conflict is NOT about what YOU believe. It is about what Creation Seventh Day Adventists believe.
Jehovah Witnesses do not believe in taking blood transfusions. I think that particular belief is "off the wall." BUT, if THEY hold that belief sincerely, no one should FORCE them to take blood.
[...]
[...]
You'll have to say what you mean by "anti-denialist" before I can answer accurately.
On your signature, it says:
If such people were amenable to facts, they would have gotten the point long ago...Whatever it is that is blocking the understanding of the "denialist", it is not access to facts or information. The blockage is most likely emotional, possibly based on fear, and one does not most effectively deal with emotional barriers by using facts as instruments of assault and battery. - Dan Murphy
What is YOUR message?
Originally Posted by DaisyDay
I don't know him well enough to make out whether he is repulsive or not, but since you seem to know him, I'll take your word on it.
The "repulsive" aspect is demonstrated in the "rough" manner and use of satire, etc. We did not see our Savior employing such an approach.
On your signature, it says:
If such people were amenable to facts, they would have gotten the point long ago...Whatever it is that is blocking the understanding of the "denialist", it is not access to facts or information. The blockage is most likely emotional, possibly based on fear, and one does not most effectively deal with emotional barriers by using facts as instruments of assault and battery. - Dan Murphy
What is YOUR message?
The "repulsive" aspect is demonstrated in the "rough" manner and use of satire, etc. We did not see our Savior employing such an approach.
Er... God and his messengers used it all the time in Scriptures. The most obvious one is Elijah mocking the Ba'al worshippers.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Click the image for the collection. Latest card(s): Tom Coburn, Godwin's Law (L) and Godwin's Law (D)
Er... God and his messengers used it all the time in Scriptures. The most obvious one is Elijah mocking the Ba'al worshippers.
Rion,
So, I guess you are saying drow57 is a type of Elijah, and the forum members are a type of the "Baal worshippers." Now, that IS a new twist I had not thought of.
So, I guess you are saying drow57 is a type of Elijah, and the forum members are a type of the "Baal worshippers." Now, that IS a new twist I had not thought of.
Do not twist my words. Also, I think the mods aren't too keen on calling other Christians"Ba'al Worshipers."
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Click the image for the collection. Latest card(s): Tom Coburn, Godwin's Law (L) and Godwin's Law (D)
Linear Mode
