Home | Be a Christian | Devotionals | Join Us! | Forums | Rules | F.A.Q.


Go Back   Christian Forums > Discussion and Debate > Physical & Life Sciences > Creation & Evolution
Register BlogsPrayersJobsArcade Calendar Mark Forums Read

Creation & Evolution Forum for the discussion of this important topic. This forum is open to non-believers. There is a Christians-only forum in the Christians-only section too.

Reply
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 24th January 2011, 06:02 PM
Searching for Truth with a Broken Flashlight

Gender: Male Married Faith: Christian Member For 3 Years
 
Join Date: 16th January 2011
Posts: 17
Blessings: 23,089
Reps: 39,624,293,601,106 (power: 39,624,293,605)
mklhawley has a reputation beyond reputemklhawley has a reputation beyond reputemklhawley has a reputation beyond reputemklhawley has a reputation beyond reputemklhawley has a reputation beyond reputemklhawley has a reputation beyond reputemklhawley has a reputation beyond reputemklhawley has a reputation beyond reputemklhawley has a reputation beyond reputemklhawley has a reputation beyond reputemklhawley has a reputation beyond reputemklhawley has a reputation beyond reputemklhawley has a reputation beyond reputemklhawley has a reputation beyond reputemklhawley has a reputation beyond repute
mklhawley has a reputation beyond reputemklhawley has a reputation beyond reputemklhawley has a reputation beyond reputemklhawley has a reputation beyond reputemklhawley has a reputation beyond reputemklhawley has a reputation beyond reputemklhawley has a reputation beyond reputemklhawley has a reputation beyond reputemklhawley has a reputation beyond reputemklhawley has a reputation beyond reputemklhawley has a reputation beyond reputemklhawley has a reputation beyond reputemklhawley has a reputation beyond reputemklhawley has a reputation beyond reputemklhawley has a reputation beyond repute
Noah's Flood was 23 ft (Gen 7:20)

Greetings all,

Most people do not realize it, but the Bible mentions how deep Noah’s floodwaters were. Genesis 7:20 states:

-“Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail;” (KJV)

Since one cubit is roughly equivalent to eighteen inches, fifteen cubits is equivalent to approximately 23 feet. The simplest and most literal interpretation of this verse states that Noah’s floodwaters rose up only to 23 feet. A flood of this magnitude could not completely inundate the entire planet, but it would do major damage to communities living at the mouth of the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers in Mesopotamia. Their “world” would have been devastated.

Young earth creationists claim that properly applied human logic points to a global flood, because of the mention of mountains and the use of global language. Note how Genesis 7:19-20 is written,

-“And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills[Hebrew: heharim], that were under the whole heaven, were covered. Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains[heharim] were covered.” (KJV)

-“And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high mountains[heharim] that were under the whole heaven were covered. Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains[heharim] were covered.” (American Standard Version of 1901)

The founders of modern creation science and modern flood geology, Henry Morris and John Whitcomb, in their book The Genesis Flood state:

“The phrase “fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail” does not mean that the Flood was only fifteen cubits (23 feet) deep, for the phrase is qualified by the one which immediately follows: “and the mountains were covered.” Nor does it necessarily mean that the mountains were covered to a depth of only fifteen cubits, for this would require that all antediluvian mountains be exactly the same altitude…. Nearly all commentators agree that the phrase “fifteen cubits” in 7:20 must therefore refer to the draught of the Ark. In other words, the Ark sank into the water to a depth of fifteen cubits (just one-half of its total height) when fully laden.”

The reason why Morris and Whitcomb did not accept the simplest literal interpretation of the clause “fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail” is because of the word “mountains” in Genesis 7:19 & 20, however, the original Hebrew text does not say “mountains”, it says can be translated as mountains, but it can also be translated as mounds, range of hills, or the hill country. For example, Psalm 121:1 translates heharim as hills: Esa eynay el heharim mey’ayin yavo ezri (I lift my eyes up to the hills). If we replace it with hills in Genesis 7:20 the second clause conforms to the simplest, most literal interpretation of the first clause:

-“Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the hills were covered.”

Interpreting as hills would mean that the King James and the American Standard translators made a common mistake. Is there any evidence that supports this mistake in the translation of Genesis 7:19-20? Yes, compare Genesis 7:19 in the King James Version with it in the American Standard Version (used by Morris and Whitcomb).

-“And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills[heharim], that were under the whole heaven, were covered.” (KJV)

-“And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high mountains[heharim] that were under the whole heaven were covered.” (American Standard Version).

Either the King James translators or the American Standard translators got it wrong. It may seem like a simple mistranslation, but it means the difference between a global flood and a local Mesopotamian flood.
A comparison of the words “prevailed” and “covered” used in Genesis 7:19 with them used in Genesis 7:20 demonstrates that Morris and Whitcomb’s “draught” logic is flawed. Notice how Genesis 7:20 is merely a rephrasing of Genesis 7:19. This rephrasing is very obvious in the Hebrew Text and also in the American Standard Version, but since the King James Version has mixed the heharim translations it seems less obvious. “Exceedingly” is the equivalent modifier for “prevailed” in Genesis 7:19 as “15 cubits upward” is in Genesis 7:20. The “draught” logic was used with Genesis 7:20, but it holds no water when applied to Genesis 7:19. “15 cubits upward” clearly refers to the waters upon the earth and not the waters measured upon the Ark. This leaves only one possible conclusion. Heharim properly translates to hills, not mountains.

Sincerely,

Mike

Last edited by mklhawley; 24th January 2011 at 06:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
Become a CF Site Supporter Today and Make These Ads Go Away!

  #2  
Unread 24th January 2011, 08:28 PM
SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE

Married Faith: Baptist Country: United States Member For 5 Years
View Profile Pic
 
Join Date: 18th June 2006
Posts: 3,101,239
Blessings: 2,490,182,578
My Mood Tell
Reps: 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 (power: 9,223,372,036,857,886)
AV1611VET has disabled reputation
Originally Posted by mklhawley View Post
Either the King James translators or the American Standard translators got it wrong. It may seem like a simple mistranslation, but it means the difference between a global flood and a local Mesopotamian flood.
Hey, Mike -- let me set my KJVO aside and agree with you for just this post, so I can make a major point that you're overlooking:

Genesis 6:13 ¶ And God said unto Noah, The end of all flesh is come before me; for the earth is filled with violence through them; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth.

This means that the water could have been 1/2 of 1/4 of 1/8 of 1/16 of 1/32 of 1 inch in depth, and they all would have drowned in it [somehow].

When God ordains it, nature doesn't stand around debating it with Him -- nature either complies or takes a hike.

Only scientists want to balk.
__________________
THE BIBLE SAYS IT, THAT SETTLES IT
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Unread 24th January 2011, 10:34 PM
juvenissun's Avatar
Veteran

62 Gender: Male Married Faith: Baptist Member For 5 Years
 
Join Date: 5th April 2007
Posts: 16,498
Blessings: 1,200,003
Reps: 92,894,628,213,224,080 (power: 92,894,628,213,248)
juvenissun has a reputation beyond reputejuvenissun has a reputation beyond reputejuvenissun has a reputation beyond reputejuvenissun has a reputation beyond reputejuvenissun has a reputation beyond reputejuvenissun has a reputation beyond reputejuvenissun has a reputation beyond reputejuvenissun has a reputation beyond reputejuvenissun has a reputation beyond reputejuvenissun has a reputation beyond reputejuvenissun has a reputation beyond reputejuvenissun has a reputation beyond reputejuvenissun has a reputation beyond reputejuvenissun has a reputation beyond reputejuvenissun has a reputation beyond repute
juvenissun has a reputation beyond reputejuvenissun has a reputation beyond reputejuvenissun has a reputation beyond reputejuvenissun has a reputation beyond reputejuvenissun has a reputation beyond reputejuvenissun has a reputation beyond reputejuvenissun has a reputation beyond reputejuvenissun has a reputation beyond reputejuvenissun has a reputation beyond reputejuvenissun has a reputation beyond reputejuvenissun has a reputation beyond reputejuvenissun has a reputation beyond reputejuvenissun has a reputation beyond reputejuvenissun has a reputation beyond reputejuvenissun has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by mklhawley View Post

-“Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the hills were covered.”
Good analysis. Thank you.

However, since the flood is a global one, the problem of water budget still exists even it is only 5 feet above the sea level.

If you want to argue for a local flood, then your analysis may not be needed, even it make sense.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Unread 24th January 2011, 10:42 PM
Nathan Poe's Avatar
Legend

40 Gender: Male Faith: Agnostic Party: US-Democrat Country: United States Member For 5 Years
View Profile Pic
 
Join Date: 21st September 2002
Location: United States
Posts: 32,413
Blessings: 62,226
Reps: 295,212,687,427,838,720 (power: 0)
Nathan Poe has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Poe has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Poe has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Poe has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Poe has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Poe has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Poe has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Poe has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Poe has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Poe has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Poe has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Poe has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Poe has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Poe has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Poe has a reputation beyond repute
Nathan Poe has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Poe has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Poe has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Poe has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Poe has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Poe has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Poe has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Poe has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Poe has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Poe has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Poe has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Poe has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Poe has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Poe has a reputation beyond reputeNathan Poe has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by AV1611VET View Post
Hey, Mike -- let me set my KJVO aside and agree with you for just this post, so I can make a major point that you're overlooking:

Genesis 6:13 ¶ And God said unto Noah, The end of all flesh is come before me; for the earth is filled with violence through them; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth.

This means that the water could have been 1/2 of 1/4 of 1/8 of 1/16 of 1/32 of 1 inch in depth, and they all would have drowned in it [somehow].

When God ordains it, nature doesn't stand around debating it with Him -- nature either complies or takes a hike.

Only scientists want to balk.
The problem is, had God ordained it, he would have succeeded -- since we already know something besides Noah and his family survived the flood (think: Goliath was a. . .) then God failed -- again.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Unread 25th January 2011, 04:04 AM
Regular Member

Gender: Male Faith: Seeker Member For 3 Years
 
Join Date: 24th January 2011
Posts: 354
Blessings: 136,490
Reps: 18,687,396,034,379,144 (power: 0)
wensdee has a reputation beyond reputewensdee has a reputation beyond reputewensdee has a reputation beyond reputewensdee has a reputation beyond reputewensdee has a reputation beyond reputewensdee has a reputation beyond reputewensdee has a reputation beyond reputewensdee has a reputation beyond reputewensdee has a reputation beyond reputewensdee has a reputation beyond reputewensdee has a reputation beyond reputewensdee has a reputation beyond reputewensdee has a reputation beyond reputewensdee has a reputation beyond reputewensdee has a reputation beyond repute
wensdee has a reputation beyond reputewensdee has a reputation beyond reputewensdee has a reputation beyond reputewensdee has a reputation beyond reputewensdee has a reputation beyond reputewensdee has a reputation beyond reputewensdee has a reputation beyond reputewensdee has a reputation beyond reputewensdee has a reputation beyond reputewensdee has a reputation beyond reputewensdee has a reputation beyond reputewensdee has a reputation beyond reputewensdee has a reputation beyond reputewensdee has a reputation beyond reputewensdee has a reputation beyond repute
For anyone to believe there was a world wide flood all reason must be set aside.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Unread 25th January 2011, 07:26 AM
SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE

Married Faith: Baptist Country: United States Member For 5 Years
View Profile Pic
 
Join Date: 18th June 2006
Posts: 3,101,239
Blessings: 2,490,182,578
My Mood Tell
Reps: 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 (power: 9,223,372,036,857,886)
AV1611VET has disabled reputation
Originally Posted by wensdee View Post
For anyone to believe there was a world wide flood all reason must be set aside.
You mean 'evidence', don't you? or are you admitting that scientists 'reasoned' themselves into rejecting the WWF?
__________________
THE BIBLE SAYS IT, THAT SETTLES IT
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Unread 25th January 2011, 07:35 AM
Godspeed, Spacebat

Gender: Female Faith: Other-Religion Country: United Kingdom Member For 5 Years
 
Join Date: 11th April 2006
Location: Bath
Posts: 3,039
Blessings: 1,095,634
My Mood Sad
Reps: 25,779,385,957,711,540 (power: 25,779,385,957,723)
Psudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond repute
Psudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond repute
You mean 'evidence', don't you? or are you admitting that scientists 'reasoned' themselves into rejecting the WWF?


Christian geologists realised there was no evidence for the global flood, yes.
__________________
Little Miss 1665 her soul remains unclaimed.
Guess she must have really sinned now
- The Offspring, Jennifer Lost the War.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Unread 25th January 2011, 07:37 AM
SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE

Married Faith: Baptist Country: United States Member For 5 Years
View Profile Pic
 
Join Date: 18th June 2006
Posts: 3,101,239
Blessings: 2,490,182,578
My Mood Tell
Reps: 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 (power: 9,223,372,036,857,886)
AV1611VET has disabled reputation
Originally Posted by Psudopod View Post
Christian geologists realised there was no evidence for the global flood, yes.
Lack of evidence is not evidence for a lack thereof -- (or however that quip goes).
__________________
THE BIBLE SAYS IT, THAT SETTLES IT
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Unread 25th January 2011, 07:43 AM
Godspeed, Spacebat

Gender: Female Faith: Other-Religion Country: United Kingdom Member For 5 Years
 
Join Date: 11th April 2006
Location: Bath
Posts: 3,039
Blessings: 1,095,634
My Mood Sad
Reps: 25,779,385,957,711,540 (power: 25,779,385,957,723)
Psudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond repute
Psudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond reputePsudopod has a reputation beyond repute
Lack of evidence is not evidence for a lack thereof -- (or however that quip goes).


True, but something like a world wide global flood should leave something behind. And it's more than just a lack of evidence. It's all the things that would be impossible if a flood had happened.
__________________
Little Miss 1665 her soul remains unclaimed.
Guess she must have really sinned now
- The Offspring, Jennifer Lost the War.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Unread 25th January 2011, 07:43 AM
Wiccan_Child's Avatar
Contributor

Gender: Male Faith: Atheist Party: UK-Liberal-Democrats Country: United Kingdom Member For 5 Years Commander
View Profile Pic
 
Join Date: 21st March 2005
Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 19,992
Blessings: 50,392,029
My Mood Mellow
Reps: 433,832,368,876,160,064 (power: 433,832,368,876,189)
Wiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond repute
Wiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by AV1611VET View Post
Lack of evidence is not evidence for a lack thereof -- (or however that quip goes).
Sure it is. The absence of evidence for elephants in my garden is pretty strong evidence that there is an absence of elephants in my garden.
__________________
I am a scientist... when I find evidence that my theories are wrong, it is as exciting as if the evidence proved them right.
Stargate: SG1

A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, -- a mere heart of stone.
Charles Darwin

What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof.
Christopher Hitchens


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Return to Creation & Evolution

Thread Tools
Display Modes


 
Become a CF Site Supporter Today and Make These Ads Go Away!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:48 AM.