[quote=Ardeshir;53412066]400 brave iranian studends stormed the US embassy in Tehran. That so called embassy planned sinister attacks against the iranian people since the 50th.
In that embassy they destroyed our young democracy and installed the Shah. The Shah got his orders direct from the US Embassy. Today is a national holiday in Iran.
Those 400 studends brought an end to the humilation of the iranian people.
/quote]
Your post raises many more questions than the unsubstantiated charges it makes.
400 brave iranian studends stormed the US embassy in Tehran. That so called embassy planned sinister attacks against the iranian people since the 50th.
In that embassy they destroyed our young democracy and installed the Shah. The Shah got his orders direct from the US Embassy. Today is a national holiday in Iran.
Those 400 studends brought an end to the humilation of the iranian people.
/quote]
Your post raises many more questions than the unsubstantiated charges it makes.
Location: 6 hours south of the Golden Dome of the University of Notre Dame
Posts: 1,671
Blessings: 39,299
Reps: 18,657,536,865 (power: 18,657,539)
Originally Posted by exotic walrus
It is a completely uncontroversial historical truism so it doesn't need evidence but feel free to read a wiki article or something and look less foolish.
Pray tell, what on earth the bolden portion above means? Similar to the "self-evident" remark, which is really translation for, "I cannot find any evidence to support my claim, or I do not want to find any evidence to support my claim." By this reasoning, everybody can exonerate themselves of the burden to substantiate their claims by summarily declaring "it is a completely uncontroversial historical truism." I find it humorous you admonish someone for looking foolish and yet conjured up a completely non-sense phrase to justify not having to substantiate your claim when asked to do so.
__________________ "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." James Madison, Father of the U.S. Constitution and 4th president of the United States.
Location: 6 hours south of the Golden Dome of the University of Notre Dame
Posts: 1,671
Blessings: 39,299
Reps: 18,657,536,865 (power: 18,657,539)
dp.
__________________ "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." James Madison, Father of the U.S. Constitution and 4th president of the United States.
GO IRISH!
Last edited by NotreDame; 5th November 2009 at 01:58 PM.
I think it was important to storm the embassy. It was a special point in history. A point that showed the people, that Iran will never accept orders from USA anymore.
And Reagan warned you that for every hostage you killed, he would completely obliterate one of your cites in the same manner we did to places like Dresdyn, Colone, Tokyo, Hiroshima, and Nagasaki. You relesed the hostages the moment Ragan took office because you believed he was mad enough to actually do it.
Since you did releses them unharmed, I consider the matter closed.
I will be the first to confess that we did overthrow your government and set up our puppet. You tossed out our puppet and are now free to build a Heaven or Hell of your own. If you wish to hold this against us and not consider the matter closed, then I will be happy to go to war against you. As it is...Let it go. I for one am not for starting any war with you and will passiontally oppose our current neocon call for a war with you. However, if YOU start one, I will be happy to finish it.
Today, 30 years ago, I was on a submarine aiming nuclear weapons at you.
You have no idea how close you came to being "Glassed" Reagan made it clear that for every hostage you killed, one city would be "Glassed".
You did the right thing to release them as Reagan was taking office.
And Reagan warned you that for every hostage you killed, he would completely obliterate one of your cites in the same manner we did to places like Dresdyn, Colone, Tokyo, Hiroshima, and Nagasaki. You relesed the hostages the moment Ragan took office because you believed he was mad enough to actually do it.
Since you did releses them unharmed, I consider the matter closed.
I will be the first to confess that we did overthrow your government and set up our puppet. You tossed out our puppet and are now free to build a Heaven or Hell of your own. If you wish to hold this against us and not consider the matter closed, then I will be happy to go to war against you. As it is...Let it go. I for one am not for starting any war with you and will passiontally oppose our current neocon call for a war with you. However, if YOU start one, I will be happy to finish it.
Thats wrong. Reagan made big words in the USA but in Iran he talked like a little cat. He offered us, to send billions of money and weapon transfer.
Beside that we consider the time of the Shah not as closed case. We want 56 billion $ from USA because thats the amount of money the Shah wasted.
How about a 50 million dollar thermonuclear warhead instead?
Stop complaining, you aren't getting anything from us.
Oh we got so much my friend. Iran was US closest ally in the middle east. We took all the US property, like Coca Cola and so on and whats best...why you think Iran got so many F16 in that time? High advanced fight planes in 1979...USA sold dozens to Iran, but as we got rid of the Shah we did not pay them. That way we took 9,5 billion from you already.
The rest comes later.
Linear Mode
