Heard this on NPR this morning. Terry Harrington and Curtis McGhee, two young african americans, where wrongly imprisoned for 25 years. They where freed after a request for records show that the police and prosecutors colluded to coach eyewitnesses to lie on the stand in order to get a conviction. Now the men are before the supreme court arguing that the prohibition on bringing suit for anything a prosecutor does at trial should not bar them from suing for civil rights violations for being framed.
The issue of course is that prosecutors are worried that this will open the flood gates to being sued for anything that they do to put criminals behind bars.
__________________ No silicon heaven? Where would all of the calculators go?
Kryton
Courage is the price that life exacts for granting peace. The soul that knows it not, knows no release from little things; Knows not the livid loneliness of fear, nor mountain hights where bitter joy can hear the sound of wings. How can life grant us boon of living, compensate for dull gray ugliness and pregnant hate unless we dare the soul's dominion? Each time we make a choice, we pay with courage to behold restless day, and count it fair.
Amelia Earhart
Those two guys were royally screwed over by the police and prosecutor. I'm not a lawyer, but I really don't see how they have a Constitutional rights case. The 6th Amendment guarrantees the right to a speedy and public trial before an impartial jury, and to have counsel and the ability to confront witnesses:
"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district where in the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence."
But it never says there exists the right to a fair trial. So if you're a strict constructionist, there is no such Constitutional right. Now maybe they have a case under federal Civil Rights laws. Depends on the wording of those laws. And I'm sure there are state laws that the prosecutor violated, i.e., suborning perjury, and he could probably be criminally charged for his misconduct. If Iowa has strict sovereign immunity laws, then the legislature should pass a special bill that would authorize compensation for these guys. But unless there are some precedents, or prior SCOTUS decisions to the contrary, I don't see that they have a Constitutional case. Will be interesting to see how the Court rules.
__________________ I can picture in my mind a world without war, a world without hate. And I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it. --- Jack Handey, Deep Thoughts
No, not in the slightest. Being in the court does not put you above it. If anything, a prosecutor is more responsible than most, just as a policeman who commits a crime gets a heavier punishment than an ordinary citizen: they are entrusted by the society to maintain justice and the law.
__________________
A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, -- a mere heart of stone.
- Charles Darwin
"I am a scientist... when I find evidence that my theories are wrong, it is as exciting as if the evidence proved them right."
- Stargate: SG1
What can be asserted without reason, can be denied without reason.
- Anon
"A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything."
I'm sorry, but if I were those guys, the very first thing I would do when getting out, is buy a hooker, then buy a gun, then I'ld send both of those scumbags straight to hell, and I'ld take my sweet time doing it.
Both of them should go up for the death penalty. Far as I'm concerned, roasting them alive would be too merciful for them.
But everyone who was apart of it should probably be charged for kidnapping and imprisonment for 25 years, and the two should get a very hefty check (of course where we get the money from is up for debate, but since they were put behind by their peers, their peers, aka society, likely should be responsible, though we could argue to take it from those who made up the lie, but then there families who are innocent are likely to be punished as well. Old question of how to punish someone without punishing those around that person.
__________________
.
..:
If history is to change, let it change. If the world is to be destroyed, so be it. If my fate is to die, I must simply laugh.
The past is dead. It was all just a dream...
- Magus
To help protect the sanctity of marriage, please keep all affairs heterosexual.
If no image appears, something has gone wrong. I don't know. Probably run out of squirrels.
Linear Mode
