~ Given that the only one who has 100% correct doctrine is GOD (Father, Son, and Holy Ghost)...
~ Given that no one on this board is GOD...
~ Given that no one on this board would thus have 100% doctrine...
~ Given that a large number of critics of Andrew Wommack hold to the demonic teachings of calvinism and its logical derivative hyper-calvinism...
~ Given that several anti-Wommack postors have unethically plagerized others work...
~ Given that several individuals who misquote or otherwise take Andrew Wommack out of context, and several of these same individuals also misquote or otherwise take other teachers out of context...
~ Given that peoples lives are saved and edified under the ministry of Andrew Wommack...
~ Given that Andrew Wommack confesses Jesus as Lord and atttempts to fulfill his part of the great commission...
~ Given that anyone who is honest is going to disagree with or argue with God from time to time...
~ Given that it is only logical that people who disagree with God, (whom we know is correct all the time), will also disagree amongst themselves (being incorrect on occasions in which they disagree with me...)
~ I must confess that I will have to look into this man's ministry when I have some time and maybe get some good food!
~ Continue to discuss amongst yourselves....
To claim a statement like that is innocuous leaves me dumbfounded...
Well then, we do have something in common. We're both dumbfounded. Yay us.
Originally Posted by Simon Peter
And in light of our ongoing conversation about judgment and punishment - where I specifically said I would Kick Bentley out of the church (no one else said that) - for you to then attempt to side step your poorly veiled personal attack by claiming it wasn't addressed to me personally, it nothing short of cowardice.
Now I'm an attacker AND a coward. How can you not see how prevalent accusation is in your posting?
FTR, you're not the only one I've heard suggest that we should kick people out of the church. Just the most recent one.
Originally Posted by Simon Peter
ps. Please tell me what exactly you expect the Apostle Paul and Jesus to reap, for their criticism of the church?
If you want to seek to justify criticism by using Paul and/or Jesus as the example, you should probably examine more than just when they were "criticizing". Otherwise, you're comparing apples to oranges.
__________________ "You're so vain, you probably think this post is about you."
~ Given that the only one who has 100% correct doctrine is GOD (Father, Son, and Holy Ghost)...
~ Given that no one on this board is GOD...
~ Given that no one on this board would thus have 100% doctrine...
~ Given that a large number of critics of Andrew Wommack hold to the demonic teachings of calvinism and its logical derivative hyper-calvinism...
~ Given that several anti-Wommack postors have unethically plagerized others work...
~ Given that several individuals who misquote or otherwise take Andrew Wommack out of context, and several of these same individuals also misquote or otherwise take other teachers out of context...
~ Given that peoples lives are saved and edified under the ministry of Andrew Wommack...
~ Given that Andrew Wommack confesses Jesus as Lord and atttempts to fulfill his part of the great commission...
~ Given that anyone who is honest is going to disagree with or argue with God from time to time...
~ Given that it is only logical that people who disagree with God, (whom we know is correct all the time), will also disagree amongst themselves (being incorrect on occasions in which they disagree with me...)
~ I must confess that I will have to look into this man's ministry when I have some time and maybe get some good food!
~ Continue to discuss amongst yourselves....
Peace,
Leimeng
Flatulo Ergo Sum ~~~
(***Insert Personal One Liner Here***)
Lei, you speak so much truth, and had no idea that I was a Calvanist!
I disagree with this point: "This means that until a person is born again (see note 2 at Jn. 3:3, p. 48), he cannot receive the Holy Spirit."
- Born again *is* receiving the Spirit!
" . . . he saved us, by the washing (baptism, complete washing) of regeneration (new birth), and renewing of the Holy Ghost; Which he shed on us abundantly (not in part) through Jesus Christ our Saviour" (Titus 3:5-6)
- We are saved by receiving the baptism of the Holy Spirit, otherwise known as the new birth. The Spirit is given fully, not in part.
Jesus spoke of this in Acts 1v4-5, 8 where he also referred to it as receiving "the promise of the Father", and receiving power.
So, Jesus returned to the Father (Acts 1v9) and began to shed forth the Holy Spirit in Acts 2:4, as previously predicted:
John 7:39: (But this spake he of the Spirit, which they that believe on him should receive: for the Holy Ghost was not yet given; because that Jesus was not yet glorified.)
See also: "But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth" (John 15:26)
". . . if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you." (John 16:7)
Even after the resurrection Jesus said: ". . Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father" (John 20:17)
At Pentecost, after his ascension, Jesus sent the Spirit from Heaven, i.e. from above .. "born again" literally means "born from above": "Therefore being by the right hand of God exalted, and having received of the Father the promise of the Holy Ghost, he hath shed forth this, which ye now see and hear" (referring to the speaking in tongues) (Acts 2:33)
"The wind blows (the spirit breathes) where it listeth, and you hear the sound thereof, but cannot tell whence it comes, and whither it goes: so is every one that is born of the Spirit." (John 3:8)
(later in Acts 11:15 Peter refers to this as "the beginning" . . . birth is the beginning!)
The disciples were born again at Pentecost, the "baptism in the Spirit" and "receiving the promise of the Spirit" are synonymous terms for the same thing.
That's why Paul says the baptism in the Spirit is how God adds people to his church:
"by one Spiritare we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit." (1Cor. 12:13)
- you cannot be saved by Jesus and not in his church!!
Do you agree?
No I do not, I appreciate your approach though.
I held this view when I was an apostolic oneness pentecostal, but not for long though.
You must be one, or a member of the trinitarian version - THE REVIVAL FELLOWSHIP
I held this view when I was an apostolic oneness pentecostal, but not for long though.
You must be one, or a member of the trinitarian version - THE REVIVAL FELLOWSHIP
Actually, all of his points are scripturally sound. The born again experience is being immersed into the forgiveness of your sins, ie The Holy Spirit. That's the true immersion of The Holy Spirit.
I looked over what he posted to see if it was a oneness position, and I didn't catch anything that was in his post unless I missed something.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"GOD doesn't call the qualified, HE qualifies the called."
"There's no glory in the flesh, and no heavenly reward either."
Actually, all of his points are scripturally sound. The born again experience is being immersed into the forgiveness of your sins, ie The Holy Spirit. That's the true immersion of The Holy Spirit.
I looked over what he posted to see if it was a oneness position, and I didn't catch anything that was in his post unless I missed something.
What do you mean the born again experience is immersed into the forgiveness of sins??? ,,,yaokay.
Actually, all of his points are scripturally sound. The born again experience is being immersed into the forgiveness of your sins, ie The Holy Spirit. That's the true immersion of The Holy Spirit.
I looked over what he posted to see if it was a oneness position, and I didn't catch anything that was in his post unless I missed something.
Well basically, in a round-a-bout way, he says that being BAPTISED IN THE HOLY SPIRIT is the same as being born of the spirit.
We have 3 views - 1) Evangelicals believe you are are born again and baptised in th Spirit at the same time.(no signs following).
2) Oneness believe you are ONLY born again once you have been Baptised in the Spirit with signs following (namely tongues). (I believe this to be my brothers view).
3) Regular Pentecostals believe that we are born of the Spirit FIRST (born again) then Baptised in the Spirit as an additional experience.
From scripture, I reconcile/side with option 3..it makes far more sense.(well to me anyway).
ALTHOUGH, in ACTS it does concentrate on the BAPTISM in then SPIRIT being the only mentioned reception of the Spirit. eg Acts 9 & 19 etc
Its a puzzle...that ONLY the whole council of scripture can solve.
BUT for me....JOHN 3v3 is God's doing - a birth from above, he regenerates.....he breathes in the first phase of life.
How do I know ?
He showed me..John 20v22.
& from personal experience.
The Lord is showing me our brother is NOT oneness, but a very , very similar group, who teach the NEW BIRTH doctrine of oneness pentecostals, without baptism in Jesus name.
There are so many groups out there, and I have mingled with quite a few !
What a state to get in ....LOL ! (call in Rodman Williams !)
__________________ Bless....
Last edited by mrhappy3; 9th November 2009 at 08:42 AM.