| Physical & Life Sciences A forum for physics, biology, chemistry and other physical sciences. |  | | 
26th October 2009, 03:01 PM
| | Regular Member

| | Join Date: 1st August 2009
Posts: 237
Blessings: 63,453
Reps: 1,505,485,233 (power: 1,505,488) | | | "It would seem that the theory of the origin of the universe was developed by a highly religious man, and that his theory might have been influenced by his religious beliefs."
it would seem you're trying to make a connection here that doesn't exist.
btw, you're a bit out of date if you're still thinking we only got the math from 1966.
"So why is there so much conflict between religion and science?"
there only is one when you try to force science in the literal interpretation of a holy book written by ignorant people. once you start taking the bible metaphorically. all of the quabbles with science start to disappear like snow in the sun. of course...for most people that is quite a step.
__________________ My picture shows why creationists lose when they say T-Rex ate plants, not Adam.
[gone for undetermined time] | 
26th October 2009, 03:05 PM
| | Regular Member

| | Join Date: 1st August 2009
Posts: 237
Blessings: 63,453
Reps: 1,505,485,233 (power: 1,505,488) | | | "Am I wrong in concluding that it is sin that is killing us and not nature?"
wrong as wrong can be.
to understand why. follow some biology courses.
__________________ My picture shows why creationists lose when they say T-Rex ate plants, not Adam.
[gone for undetermined time] | 
26th October 2009, 03:24 PM
|  | I Love Pigeons
 | | Join Date: 4th March 2009
Posts: 5,148
Blessings: 1,098,467 My Mood
Reps: 120,598,226,738,586,336 (power: 120,598,226,738,594) | | Originally Posted by random325nicaea btw, you're a bit out of date if you're still thinking we only got the math from 1966. If the math was wrong back then who is to say it isn't wrong now. I'm sure back then the math was believable, even more believable than it is today. But yet it was wrong. Believable but wrong. That pretty much sums up the big bang theory. there only is one when you try to force science in the literal interpretation of a holy book written by ignorant people. once you start taking the bible metaphorically. all of the quabbles with science start to disappear like snow in the sun. of course...for most people that is quite a step.
Would you also be referring to Fr. Lemaitre?
__________________ God exists, therefore you are wrong. “Let God be true, and every man a liar.” __________________ | 
26th October 2009, 03:33 PM
| | Legend 26  | | Join Date: 23rd July 2007 Location: London
Posts: 11,386
Blessings: 5,167,277 My Mood
Reps: 205,146,621,849,477,600 (power: 0) | | Originally Posted by Doveaman If the math was wrong back then who is to say it isn't wrong now. I'm sure back then the math was believable, even more believable than it is today. But yet it was wrong. Believable but wrong. That pretty much sums up the big bang theory.
Math is either right or wrong. Not "believable."
How many times have you had to be corrected on this?
I also find it mildly ironic that you make this claim when you haven't even attempted to put a single math-based argument forward relating to the Big Bang theory. Would you also be referring to Fr. Lemaitre?
No, YECs, as they're incapable of coming to terms with the Big Bang. | 
26th October 2009, 03:35 PM
|  | SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE 57 
| | Join Date: 18th June 2006 Location: United States
Posts: 2,126,171
Blessings: 2,934,947,776 My Mood
Reps: 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 (power: 9,223,372,036,856,908) | | Originally Posted by Doveaman If the math was wrong back then who is to say it isn't wrong now.  --- Whatever you do, please don't mention Pi.
__________________ GOD SAID IT -- THAT SETTLES IT | 
26th October 2009, 03:38 PM
| | Legend 26  | | Join Date: 23rd July 2007 Location: London
Posts: 11,386
Blessings: 5,167,277 My Mood
Reps: 205,146,621,849,477,600 (power: 0) | | Originally Posted by AV1611VET  --- Whatever you do, please don't mention Pi.
He can mention it all he wants - that isn't our problem. | 
26th October 2009, 03:39 PM
|  | SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE 57 
| | Join Date: 18th June 2006 Location: United States
Posts: 2,126,171
Blessings: 2,934,947,776 My Mood
Reps: 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 (power: 9,223,372,036,856,908) | | Originally Posted by Cabal He can mention it all he wants - that isn't our problem.
I think that one went over your head, didn't it?
__________________ GOD SAID IT -- THAT SETTLES IT | 
26th October 2009, 03:43 PM
| | Legend 26  | | Join Date: 23rd July 2007 Location: London
Posts: 11,386
Blessings: 5,167,277 My Mood
Reps: 205,146,621,849,477,600 (power: 0) | | Originally Posted by AV1611VET I think that one went over your head, didn't it?
You would know.... | 
26th October 2009, 04:06 PM
|  | blind squirrel

| | Join Date: 7th January 2003
Posts: 10,609
Blessings: 2,209,414
Reps: 420,956,954,470,510,592 (power: 420,956,954,470,530) | | Originally Posted by AV1611VET Because science has to cater to nature, and nature is hostile to God.
For instance, God says death is His enemy, but science teaches death as an integral part of nature.
Death to animate objects (evolution), as well as death to inanimate objects (entropy) are routine predictions in science.
In addition, nature places demands on life that God never intended to put us through.
Fight or flight, survival of the fittest, pain, struggles, and worry are not something God intended for us.
In the end, God is going to intervene and put an end to His enemies.
We just need to be patient.
That's a pretty good summation.
__________________ - Daisy
If such people were amenable to facts, they would have gotten the point long ago...Whatever it is that is blocking the understanding of the "denialist", it is not access to facts or information. The blockage is most likely emotional, possibly based on fear, and one does not most effectively deal with emotional barriers by using facts as instruments of assault and battery. - Dan Murphy | 
26th October 2009, 04:08 PM
|  | SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE 57 
| | Join Date: 18th June 2006 Location: United States
Posts: 2,126,171
Blessings: 2,934,947,776 My Mood
Reps: 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 (power: 9,223,372,036,856,908) | | Originally Posted by aisy_Day That's a pretty good summation.  --- Thank you.
__________________ GOD SAID IT -- THAT SETTLES IT |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | | | |