Just because you fail to understand the "documented evidence" for 'macroevolution' doesn't mean others can't.
BTW, there is no distinction between micro/macroevolution. Stop spreading falsehoods (aka PRATTs).
Originally Posted by Thistlethorn
You have to want them to be different for you to tell them apart, and then you're just fooling yourself.
Just for the record, guys, real scientists DO use the terms Microevolution and Macroevolution. They are perverted by Professional Creationists, but they are real terms.
__________________ "We must abandon the prevalent belief in the superior wisdom of the ignorant." – Daniel Boorstin
"Ignorance should NOT be tolerated just because it's cloaked in religion."
-Phred
"Creationists can't all be right but they can all be wrong."
-Frumious Bandersnatch
"Mutation" to me, is what Thalidomide did, or Chernobyl, or Hiroshima.
"Mutation" to me, is something that went wrong --- not the product of natural processes.
I have trouble with TEs believing we are mutant copy-errors, made in God's image.
The language is all wrong, and is indicative of higher academia's anti-Biblical indoctrinations.
/soapbox
LOL! The use of the word mutation is "indicative of higher academia's anti-Biblical indoctrinations??" What?! I guess if you can justify creationism, you can justify just about any conclusion from any information, huh? This just reinforces my own accessment that you and other creationists are not capable of interpreting scripture or anything else correctly, regardless of how many years you have studied it.
__________________ "We must abandon the prevalent belief in the superior wisdom of the ignorant." – Daniel Boorstin
"Ignorance should NOT be tolerated just because it's cloaked in religion."
-Phred
"Creationists can't all be right but they can all be wrong."
-Frumious Bandersnatch
Just for the record, guys, real scientists DO use the terms Microevolution and Macroevolution. They are perverted by Professional Creationists, but they are real terms.
Yes, but only to describe the same process on different levels.
True, but it's still the same process. To say one exists and the other doesn't shows a lack of understanding of the fundamental concept of it being the same things on different levels.
"Mutation" to me, is what Thalidomide did, or Chernobyl, or Hiroshima.
"Mutation" to me, is something that went wrong --- not the product of natural processes.
I have trouble with TEs believing we are mutant copy-errors, made in God's image.
The language is all wrong, and is indicative of higher academia's anti-Biblical indoctrinations.
/soapbox
So what you're saying is that you insist on using words in your own particular way, and then holding us responsible for the resulting conclusions even when you know the actual definition?
There's a formal name for that. It's called an equivocation fallacy. Doing it on purpose after people have corrected your word usage is called lying. Your post shows both 1: that you know the real definition and 2: that you refuse to use it. I believe there is sufficient evidence to call you a liar.
I wonder if the bible you hold in such high regard has anything to say about that.
__________________ On "illegal" immigration: "Give us your poor, your tired, your huddled masses longing to be free..." -The Statue of Liberty
On the alleged connection between Hitler and Atheism:
"For it was by the Will of God that men were made of a certain bodily shape, were given their natures and their faculties." -Hitler, Mein Kampf, Volume II, Chapter X
On gay marriage (or any other discrimination) and the Bible:
"God has shown me that I should not call any man impure or unclean." -Paul the Apostle, Acts 10:28
So what you're (AV1611VET) saying is that you insist on using words in your own particular way, and then holding us responsible for the resulting conclusions even when you know the actual definition?
There's a formal name for that. It's called an equivocation fallacy. Doing it on purpose after people have corrected your word usage is called lying. Your post shows both 1: that you know the real definition and 2: that you refuse to use it. I believe there is sufficient evidence to call you a liar.
I wonder if the bible you hold in such high regard has anything to say about that.
Let's be as kind as possible. AV1611VET isn't exactly lying. He has Humpty Dumpty syndrome. He redefines words at his own convenience and he is irreparably cracked.
__________________ "A belief which leaves no place for doubt is not a belief; it is a superstition." - Jose Bergamin
"You can't trust an honest man." --- Anonymous
"He does not believe who does not live according to his belief." -- Thomas Fuller
"The fact that the author thinks slowly is not serious, but the fact that he publishes faster than he thinks is inexcusable." -- Wolfgang Pauli
"He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God?" -- Micah 6:8
"It is because we believe absurdities that we are able to commit atrocities." -- Voltaire
"This isn't right. This isn't even wrong." -- Wolfgang Pauli
"Je ne suis pas marxiste." -- Karl Marx
"Faith is believing what you know ain't so."-- Mark Twain
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." -- Albert Einstein
Let's be as kind as possible. AV1611VET isn't exactly lying. He has Humpty Dumpty syndrome. He redefines words at his own convenience and he is irreparably cracked.
Let'em call me a liar --- Jesus was called a deceiver in His time.
I've said this before, and I'll say it again: they have no idea what a real lie is.
That's why they can't tell a martyr from a suicide bomber.
Linear Mode
