| Creation & Evolution Forum for the discussion of this important topic. This forum is open to non-believers. There is a Christians-only forum in the Christians-only section too. |
 | | 
27th October 2009, 08:03 AM
|  | SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
57     
 | | Join Date: 18th June 2006 Location: United States
Posts: 2,126,164
Blessings: 2,934,947,675 My Mood 
Reps: 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 (power: 9,223,372,036,856,908) | | Originally Posted by Split Rock  So, is The Beast going to be a Scientist?
In my opinion --- yes.
And I have stated so more than once.
__________________ GOD SAID IT -- THAT SETTLES IT
|
27th October 2009, 12:55 PM
| | Regular Member
   
| | Join Date: 1st August 2009
Posts: 237
Blessings: 63,453
Reps: 1,505,485,233 (power: 1,505,488) | | " Have a good day, random325nicaea --- 
I won't spoil it for you."
gj at dodging the question.
__________________
My picture shows why creationists lose when they say T-Rex ate plants, not Adam.
[gone for undetermined time] |
27th October 2009, 02:00 PM
|  | PeteAce - In memory of WinAce
33 
| | Join Date: 30th June 2002
Posts: 8,425
Blessings: 2,093,384
Reps: 9,311,669,886,675,212 (power: 9,311,669,886,693) | | Originally Posted by AV1611VET It is science that is going to [supposedly] win, only to get a wake-up call at the last minute.
Yeah, yeah, one day stuff will happen and things will take place. I get it.
Besides, we all know what is really going to happen is machines are going to take over the world and we'll all be jacked into the Matrix. And have kung-fu powers. Which will be awesome.
__________________
Creationism has not made a single contribution to agriculture, medicine, conservation, forestry, pathology, or any other applied area of biology. Creationism has yielded no classifications, no biogeographies, no underlying mechanisms, no unifying concepts with which to study organisms or life. - Botanical Society of America's Statement on Evolution |
27th October 2009, 03:01 PM
| | SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
57
| | Join Date: 18th June 2006 Location: United States
Posts: 2,126,164
Blessings: 2,934,947,675 My Mood
Reps: 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 (power: 9,223,372,036,856,908) | | Originally Posted by Pete Harcoff Besides, we all know what is really going to happen is machines are going to take over the world and we'll all be jacked into the Matrix. And have kung-fu powers. Which will be awesome.
Until you guys learn that there's another type of energy in existence, you're never going to understand anything.
The martial arts come close to describing it, but not close enough.
__________________ GOD SAID IT -- THAT SETTLES IT
|
27th October 2009, 03:07 PM
| | PeteAce - In memory of WinAce
33
| | Join Date: 30th June 2002
Posts: 8,425
Blessings: 2,093,384
Reps: 9,311,669,886,675,212 (power: 9,311,669,886,693) | | Originally Posted by AV1611VET Until you guys learn that there's another type of energy in existence, you're never going to understand anything.
Unless you can quantitatively demonstrate this, then I don't care.
__________________
Creationism has not made a single contribution to agriculture, medicine, conservation, forestry, pathology, or any other applied area of biology. Creationism has yielded no classifications, no biogeographies, no underlying mechanisms, no unifying concepts with which to study organisms or life. - Botanical Society of America's Statement on Evolution |
27th October 2009, 03:11 PM
|  | Worldly Influence
26    
| | Join Date: 20th July 2007 Location: Tehachapi, CA
Posts: 861
Blessings: 63,734 My Mood 
Reps: 1,530,604,549,953 (power: 1,530,604,554) | | Originally Posted by AV1611VET In my opinion --- yes.
And I have stated so more than once.
So who's your most likely candidate? Richard Dawkins? Neil deGrasse Tyson? Eugenie Scott? The most outspoken secular scientists don't seem to have any political ambition whatsoever, and if they did, what platform would they run on?
On even closer examination, the fact that you could seriously hold the opinion that an evil scientist will take over the world I think speaks volumes about just how cartoony and juvenile the worldview you have expressed on this forum really is.
__________________
"I would still reply, that the knavery and folly of men are such common phenomena, that I should rather believe the most extraordinary events to arise from their concurrence, than admit of so signal a violation of the laws of nature."
-David Hume |
27th October 2009, 03:32 PM
| | SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
57
| | Join Date: 18th June 2006 Location: United States
Posts: 2,126,164
Blessings: 2,934,947,675 My Mood
Reps: 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 (power: 9,223,372,036,856,908) | | Originally Posted by Deadbolt So who's your most likely candidate? Richard Dawkins? Neil deGrasse Tyson? Eugenie Scott? The most outspoken secular scientists don't seem to have any political ambition whatsoever, and if they did, what platform would they run on?
I don't get into that.
I'm not a date-setter, and I'm not a finger-pointer. Originally Posted by Deadbolt On even closer examination, the fact that you could seriously hold the opinion that an evil scientist will take over the world I think speaks volumes about just how cartoony and juvenile the worldview you have expressed on this forum really is.
The world will have a different opinion when they see him perform an act that you guys say you can't even explain: abiogenesis.
That, I'm sure, will get the attention of even the most skeptical scientist.
__________________ GOD SAID IT -- THAT SETTLES IT
|
27th October 2009, 04:47 PM
|  | The Moon is a reflection of the MorningStar
| | Join Date: 11th August 2007
Posts: 5,781
Blessings: 4,078,254 My Mood 
Reps: 56,734,881,133,185,528 (power: 56,734,881,133,195) | | Originally Posted by AV1611VET That, I'm sure, will get the attention of even the most skeptical scientist.
sure would. If god shows up and starts doing stuff i would believe. Its immoral for god to expect people to blindly follow him before such time though.
I find it funny that in the bible praises blind faith but not believe in him when their is no evidence of his existence is somehow punishable by going to hell.
actually i understand it completely. Its exactly how little kids believe in Santa. Actually confirming his existence is punishment believing without question, a virtue.
Sure faeries exist. But in order to see them, you have to believe in them when your alive and can only see them when you die. but on a special day all the fairy will come out of hiding and all those who didn't believe they existed will get turned into toads. all those that did believe in them will go to a fairy tea party with the best food in the universe. You will get to meet all your loved ones that died when this happened. oh except for the ones that didn't believe in fairies. after all they didn't believe in fairies so and the party is so amazing that its really of little consequence that they are now toads.
Last edited by MoonLancer; 27th October 2009 at 05:30 PM.
|
27th October 2009, 04:48 PM
| | Senior Veteran
32   
| | Join Date: 21st January 2005
Posts: 4,815
Blessings: 62,743
Reps: 54,806,534,063,437,296 (power: 0) | | Originally Posted by Pete Harcoff Yeah, yeah, one day stuff will happen and things will take place. I get it.
Besides, we all know what is really going to happen is machines are going to take over the world and we'll all be jacked into the Matrix. And have kung-fu powers. Which will be awesome.
Do I get to fly the helicopter? |
27th October 2009, 05:15 PM
| | PeteAce - In memory of WinAce
33
| | Join Date: 30th June 2002
Posts: 8,425
Blessings: 2,093,384
Reps: 9,311,669,886,675,212 (power: 9,311,669,886,693) | | Originally Posted by The Lady Kate Do I get to fly the helicopter?
That and ride a motorcycle. 
__________________
Creationism has not made a single contribution to agriculture, medicine, conservation, forestry, pathology, or any other applied area of biology. Creationism has yielded no classifications, no biogeographies, no underlying mechanisms, no unifying concepts with which to study organisms or life. - Botanical Society of America's Statement on Evolution | | |
| Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
| | |
