| Christian Apologetics A forum to discuss the systematic defense of the Christian belief system with other Christians. |  | | 
24th October 2009, 08:16 AM
| | Regular Member
 | | Join Date: 17th November 2008
Posts: 1,280
Blessings: 163,955
Reps: 103,712,394,032,025,664 (power: 103,712,394,032,030) | | | God doesn't love every man, woman, and child that ever existed. It is universally assumed that the God of the Bible loves every man, woman, and child that ever existed. Within this topic, I would like to spend some time outlining the popular verses leading to that assumption and explain why they don't mean what people think they do.
Perhaps the easiest one to debunk is 2 Peter 3:9.
I'll be using the Scripture4All - Greek/Hebrew interlinear Bible software
2 Peter 3:9:
The Lord is not slack
concerning his promise, as
some men count slackness; but
is longsuffering to us-ward,
not willing that any should
perish, but that all should come to repentance.
The context of the chapter is Peter making a distinction between the scoffers (v. 3) and the believers (v. 9). The context is an Us vs. Them, not God loves every man, woman, child that ever lived. | 
24th October 2009, 08:21 AM
| | Regular Member
 | | Join Date: 17th November 2008
Posts: 1,280
Blessings: 163,955
Reps: 103,712,394,032,025,664 (power: 103,712,394,032,030) | | | Before proceeding, I need to address the English word 'all'.
If my son and daughter are playing in the park with the neighbor kids. I open the door and yell 'Dinner's ready'! Do all the children playing at the park hear my voice? Do all the children respond to my call?
The answer to the first 'all' is yes.
The answer to the second 'all' is no.
What I have just done is present a simple analogy of the difference between Sufficient and Efficacious Grace. The desired effect of me calling my children, and no one else, is that they came home for dinner.
Sufficient Grace -
Being as much as is needed. (Christ dying for 'all' mankind)
Efficacious Grace-
Producing or capable of producing a desired effect. (He calls His Elect Family to Him) | 
24th October 2009, 04:39 PM
| | Senior Veteran
 | | Join Date: 15th February 2004
Posts: 7,235
Blessings: 80,299,210 My Mood
Reps: 573,721,884,829,066,624 (power: 573,721,884,829,081) | | | Dear Eph4:26. God is LOVE, and He loves us as our Heavenly Father. God woos us to the very last, and if we do not want His Love, and God does not force, or coerce us, what can be done?? Jesus told us of a place in Outer Darkness, without God`s Love or Light, where there can be heard loud wailing and gnashing of teeth. I believe it is because those poor souls there, realise too late the grave mistake they made. As for your example of the father who calls all his children to come in, that could never be God calling. God is everywhere, and calls ALL His children. But God told us, "Whosoever will may come." I say this humbly and with love. Greetings from Emmy, sister in Christ. | 
24th October 2009, 07:09 PM
|  | Urban Nomad. Literally.
 | | Join Date: 2nd November 2007 Location: Freezing, America
Posts: 14,478
Blessings: 1,538,286 My Mood
Reps: 416,617,700,174,524,864 (power: 416,617,700,174,543) | | Originally Posted by Eph4:26 It is universally assumed that the God of the Bible loves every man, woman, and child that ever existed. Within this topic, I would like to spend some time outlining the popular verses leading to that assumption and explain why they don't mean what people think they do.
Perhaps the easiest one to debunk is 2 Peter 3:9.
I'll be using the Scripture4All - Greek/Hebrew interlinear Bible software
2 Peter 3:9:
The Lord is not slack
concerning his promise, as
some men count slackness; but
is longsuffering to us-ward,
not willing that any should
perish, but that all should come to repentance.
The context of the chapter is Peter making a distinction between the scoffers (v. 3) and the believers (v. 9). The context is an Us vs. Them, not God loves every man, woman, child that ever lived.
Pointing out the fallen nature of people and that we have to fight against this nature in now way is unloving. You have a heavy burden here, I hope you are up to the challenge.
__________________ Originally Posted by CaliforniaJosiah To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. dir="ltr"> "Offense" is something TAKEN. No one MAKES anyone feel anything. IF we are offended by something, we CHOSE to be offended by it...
But I think that OFTEN, people confuse discussion with fighting. Disagreeing is not personal, it is not an attack, it is not disrespectful or flaming, it is not offensive per se. It ONLY means, "I disagree." Nothing more. Nothing less. It suggests NO emotional response whatsoever.
NO ONE is mandated to agree with anyone. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | 
25th October 2009, 12:31 AM
|  | beside quiet waters He restores my soul..

| | Join Date: 20th September 2004 Location: Singleton NSW
Posts: 6,398
Blessings: 4,149,681 My Mood
Reps: 24,160,000,787,179,980 (power: 24,160,000,787,193) | | Originally Posted by Eph4:26 Before proceeding, I need to address the English word 'all'.
If my son and daughter are playing in the park with the neighbor kids. I open the door and yell 'Dinner's ready'! Do all the children playing at the park hear my voice? Do all the children respond to my call?
The answer to the first 'all' is yes.
The answer to the second 'all' is no.
What I have just done is present a simple analogy of the difference between Sufficient and Efficacious Grace. The desired effect of me calling my children, and no one else, is that they came home for dinner.
Sufficient Grace -
Being as much as is needed. (Christ dying for 'all' mankind)
Efficacious Grace-
Producing or capable of producing a desired effect. (He calls His Elect Family to Him)
Ah, but the English word 'all' is a translation from the Greek, 'pas', which means.. Thayer's Greek Definitions
1) individually
1a) each, every, any, all, the whole, everyone, all things,everything
2) collectively
2a) some of all types (there is only one type of mankind) Strong's Greek Lexicon
including all the forms of declension; apparently a primary word; all, any, every, the whole:-all (manner of, means), alway(-s), any (one), X daily, + ever, every (one, way), as many as, + no(-thing), X thoroughly, whatsoever, whole, whosoever.
It apparently doesn't mean 'some of', or 'just enough as needed'.
__________________ Christina Wing ~ If love has limits, then it's not love. Love goes where there are no bounds, no space, no limits. There is no line drawn that love won't blow through it. That's His heart, to love all with no limits.
Dan Sheridan ~ God is a Savior, not a probation officer.
Mike Williams ~ Redemption and only redemption redeems the human spirit. The knowledge and only the knowledge of that redemption saves the human soul. | 
25th October 2009, 01:03 AM
|  | Deus est regit qui omnia 19 
| | Join Date: 14th April 2008 Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,947
Blessings: 1,156,900
Reps: 154,453,018,393,906,720 (power: 154,453,018,393,912) | | | boy are you off
doesn't the sun come up every day?
__________________ But this I call to mind, and therefore I have hope:
The steadfast love of the LORD never ceases;
His mercies never come to an end;
They are new every morning;
Great is Your faithfulness. Lamentations 3:21-23 | 
25th October 2009, 01:16 AM
|  | Contributor 68 
| | Join Date: 10th June 2008 Location: Maryborough, QLD, Australia
Posts: 7,687
Blessings: 1,406,432
Reps: 294,965,212,214,612,864 (power: 294,965,212,214,623) | | Originally Posted by Eph4:26 Before proceeding, I need to address the English word 'all'.
[color=Blue]
If my son and daughter are playing in the park with the neighbor kids. I open the door and yell 'Dinner's ready'! Do all the children playing at the park hear my voice? Do all the children respond to my call?
The answer to the first 'all' is yes.
The answer to the second 'all' is no.
Cute. So now explain how it is that only 'some' respond. Unless you are prepared to make that explanation I doubt you will have anything useful to contribute.
__________________ Not all those who wander are lost | 
25th October 2009, 07:58 AM
| | Regular Member
 | | Join Date: 17th November 2008
Posts: 1,280
Blessings: 163,955
Reps: 103,712,394,032,025,664 (power: 103,712,394,032,030) | | Dear Emmy: Your citation of 'God is LOVE' is not unconditional, nor can it be used to 'prove' God loves every man, woman, child that ever lived.
I'm going to try to make an overly simplified algebraic equation and provide an example where God's love in the Bible can be viewed as conditional:
1 John 4:8:
Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love.
The English word love in the original Greek text is Agape (ag-ah'-pay). It does not mean to have affection for.
Same word as in 2 John 6 "this is love (agape) that we walk after his commandments"
God = Love.
Love = obeying the commandments.
Rev. 3:19
'Those whom I love (Phileo), I reprove and discipline; therefore be zealous and repent.
If God, as the word is used in the original Greek text (Theos), means magistrate, then He only has affection (phileo) to those that obey His Laws.
An example . . .
As a citizen of the USA, I have the right to drive on the streets of this country. But that right is conditional. I can not pull out of my drive way and proceed to drive down the left side of the road. The Law of the land will catch up with me very quickly and either give me a ticket, or I'll get hit by oncoming traffic. Originally Posted by Emmy . . . But God told us, "Whosoever will may come." I say this humbly and with love. Greetings from Emmy, sister in Christ.
Your quote is not in the Bible, it is a theology not consistent with what the Bible teaches. | 
25th October 2009, 08:23 AM
| | Regular Member
 | | Join Date: 17th November 2008
Posts: 1,280
Blessings: 163,955
Reps: 103,712,394,032,025,664 (power: 103,712,394,032,030) | | | Tavita, your citation's of Thayer's and Strong's are technically accurate. However, they don't provide Biblical content.
Allow me to explain,
The best example in the Bible where God loved a particular 'all' is where Paul compares God's love to a husband loving his wife (singular) and no one else Ephesians 5:21-33
The 'all' men (or what Thayer's would describe as 'collectively', 'some of all types') is not mankind, but a chosen gentile few that God called. I could go on in greater detail, if you like. | 
25th October 2009, 08:25 AM
| | Regular Member
 | | Join Date: 17th November 2008
Posts: 1,280
Blessings: 163,955
Reps: 103,712,394,032,025,664 (power: 103,712,394,032,030) | | Originally Posted by itisdeliciouscake boy are you off
doesn't the sun come up every day?
Your cryptic question is lost on me. Would you like to explain? |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | | | |