Creation & EvolutionForum for the discussion of this important topic. This forum is open to non-believers. There is a Christians-only forum in the Christians-only section too.
Because quantum effects don't happen on the scale needed to make 6000 years jump seven orders of magnitude to make the age of the universe look like the age science says it is. Quantum tunnelling exists, yes. Can a person walk through a wall? No.
The effects exist, however, so there has to be a cause. Man is in prison, so I do not expect man to be able to transcend the bars! But the earth is eternal, (in another state universe) so one might expect that our state of flux would have some interactions with the future state.
Let me get this right - you don't know what the point is but you're sure I don't have it? Whatever, dad.
Well, thats what it looks like, feel free to dispel the notion, with a stunning point, if I underestimated you there.
I thought you just said you shouldn't think of anything as an isolated system.
Well, man is isolated from the spiritual, for the most part at the moment. We are not in total isolation, apparently, because spirits can visit the prison! Now, the structure of this prison universe, at least at the quantum basement level, seems to have some interaction with forces on the outside, as it were. Any tunneling that might go on, if any, will not include a passage to accomodate inmates.
How in the world is introducing a correlation with an entirely different set of laws of physics meant to be "simpler"?
Easy, let's see you correlate 10,000 times the speed of light !
Now who's snipping words? I said, I couldn't answer properly by your standards - but you're so clueless about science you couldn't establish proper standards in this debate to save your life.
I would like you to answer properly by ANY standards! The kind of answer a lurker can see is something special.
Tough dad, that was a pretty obvious tie-in, which you missed. Might want to actually learn some quantum mechanics before declaring everything wrong.
Tell us about this tie in, you think was missed! What a scream.
What are you talking about decay for? We're talking about time travel here.
No idea, I thought you brought it up in a lame attempt to limit the range of quantum phenomena? Say what you mean, if you ever figure it out.
I know what it said. It's still an innuendo that had no basis in reality or in what I said.
Pretty vague stuff there. It makes an innuendo look like heavy documentation!
Listen dad - I'm going to take an aside from the topic here. Drop the attitude. Don't post calm down and then spend the rest of the post flaming and goading. You're coming in with the high ground here, act like it. And let me tell you - your attitude here doesn't impress many people.
OK, long as you stop asking me to 'repent'! Maybe cut the paranoid delusional stuff too, where you think I am looking directly at you when talking of the proud LHC stuff.
I don't think I need to add anything else to this. You wouldn't be the first Luddite prophesying doom and missing the mark completely.
Science fries out all the universe in it's demented head, you call me a doom meister? Weird.
__________________ Pr 21:30 -There is no wisdom nor understanding nor counsel against the LORD.
Has Dad ever bothered to explain how his ideas are parsimonious?
Entanglement is not only not parsimonious, it is not undertood. <staff edit>
" Nobody knows how the quantum world behaves the way it does, all we know is that it does behave the way it does.” Richard Feynman
<staff edit>
So, we have strange forces from somewhere unknown acting upon things that are known. Time is very much involved, and a stunning lack of time needed for the effect to be seen on entangled objects. Many do feel that there is some going backwards from the future, and that sort of thing involved. You know, the darn things behave as if they knew the future..been there done that. Light speed or other constraints of 'normal' physics are no constraints either. If you want to present some sanctimonious, parsimonious case for that, let's see you do it. <staff edit>
<staff edit>
__________________ Pr 21:30 -There is no wisdom nor understanding nor counsel against the LORD.
Last edited by Philothei; 2nd November 2009 at 12:35 PM.
Reason: staff permanent edits
There's no "apply" about it. Objects are quantum. End of.
Yeesh, well no wonder you don't understand it.
Because no scientific theory is ever perfect?
Oh dad, you card. When's the stand-up career beginning?
Not sure there is a lot of meat in this. Doesn't seem to be much worth addressing.
Yes, it would be - why does an omnipotent omnipresent God need a time travelling ship?
Need? Why do you need a BMW? Maybe the cherubim need it Why second guess God? He has wheels, lets deal with it. It is right there in Eze, in the bible.
Yes, dad, well done. So why did you bring up forces if you already knew this?
If I don't know something, why bring it up? Strange. Is that what you do??
If I brought up 'forces' (?) it would be because some force was at work somewhere.
Some have really questioned the basic assumptions of forces, and even light, and photons..
"So entities such as photons or electrons should always be either particles or waves, but not simultaneously both. So the model implies that light and electricity propagate as pure waves only: there is no such thing as "photons" or "electrons" propagating through the universe. Then when the waves encounter matter (for example, a detector), the energy of the wave-matter interaction may cause the release of a pure particle (the thing we usually associate with a "photon" or an "electron")."