27th October 2009, 12:29 PM
|
 | Christian, Calvinist, Capitalist
29       
 | | Join Date: 18th February 2002 Location: AL
Posts: 6,766
Blessings: 170,280 My Mood 
Reps: 138,362,981,548,332,672 (power: 138,362,981,548,348) | |
| I think the article in the OP is a sensational piece for the media to latch onto. The concept of "bara" as not-meaning "ex nihilo" is nothing new. I think the concept has more to do with fashioning or shaping. I do understand how she gets seperating from the immediate context though. the downside to one of her points is that in places like Isaiah 45:7 "bara" is used with just one object instead of two. But Gen 1:1 seems more as a title to me that forms an inclusio with Gen 2:3. The whole idea that is being communicated seems to be that THIS is how God fashioned the heavens and the earth and assigned appropriate function to everything in the heavens and earth (or something along those lines).
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
M.S. in Economics
"The market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent." - JM Keynes
semper reformada |
Linear Mode
