Origins TheologyForum for the discussion of Creation Science (Young/Old) vs Theistic Evolution. Discussion of Atheistic Evolution should be taken to the Discussion and Debate forums.
I know Dawkins finds the alien hypothesis more likely than divine intervention, but I don't think he takes either seriously.
__________________ We can allow satellites, planets, suns, universe, nay whole systems of universes, to be governed by laws, but the smallest insect, we wish to be created at once by special act.
__________________ We can allow satellites, planets, suns, universe, nay whole systems of universes, to be governed by laws, but the smallest insect, we wish to be created at once by special act.
You guys do realize this video is pure sarcasm, right?
Really? I feel so burned. Being a religious person, I guess I'm just so used to accepting what I hear without thinking, I thought for sure it was a legitimate video.
__________________ For free printable drum lessons with audio check out my website. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I know Dawkins finds the alien hypothesis more likely than divine intervention, but I don't think he takes either seriously.
I know he doesn't take it seriously, he said so at the American Atheists '09 thingy. He was commenting on quote mining and he used his clip from Expelled as an example. He said that when he was asked about being created (I forget the exact question) he was basically trying to go out on a limb to give it the tiniest chance he could, and aliens was the best he could do, and he made it clear that it's not what he believes. He was just trying to be nice...
__________________ For free printable drum lessons with audio check out my website. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I haven't changed his outfit since July 4th. I need to dress him in his Halloween finery.
Originally Posted by Chesterton
Well it's what he's said. He said it's an "intriguing possibility".
See Phil's post.
__________________ (The Library of Alexandria) questioned the permanence of the stars, but did not question the justice of slavery - Carl Sagan in Cosmos
I know he doesn't take it seriously, he said so at the American Atheists '09 thingy. He was commenting on quote mining and he used his clip from Expelled as an example. He said that when he was asked about being created (I forget the exact question) he was basically trying to go out on a limb to give it the tiniest chance he could, and aliens was the best he could do, and he made it clear that it's not what he believes. He was just trying to be nice...
After the movie came out he's written and spoken about it trying to distance himself from what he said because people mildly freaked out that he said it. But I don't see why he sees the need to take back what he said. If a-biogenesis is a legitmate idea then alien-biogenesis is equally legitimate.
But, Dawkins publicly making a fool of himself for the sake of being nice? Ho ho, that's rich. I think panspermia itself is more probable than that.
You can listen and decide for yourself. Quoting or quote-mining? (Ignore the over-zealous clip title.)
After the movie came out he's written and spoken about it trying to distance himself from what he said because people mildly freaked out that he said it. But I don't see why he sees the need to take back what he said. If a-biogenesis is a legitmate idea then alien-biogenesis is equally legitimate.
But, Dawkins publicly making a fool of himself for the sake of being nice? Ho ho, that's rich. I think panspermia itself is more probable than that.
You can listen and decide for yourself. Quoting or quote-mining? (Ignore the over-zealous clip title.)
__________________ For free printable drum lessons with audio check out my website. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.