| Traditional Adventists The forum for Adventist members. |
 | | 
18th October 2009, 12:34 AM
| | Member
35   
| | Join Date: 9th February 2008
Posts: 150
Blessings: 89,834
Reps: 2,443,476,483,755 (power: 2,443,476,488) | | Originally Posted by djconklin  46. "She was trying to point you all toward christ instead you worship her;" (10/15/2009)
We had some in the church I grew up in that believed that you couldn't go to heaven without EGW. Unfortunately, for a few this one is true. However it is more about a misinformed individual than the denomination. |
18th October 2009, 04:47 PM
| | Moderate SDA
61    
| | Join Date: 8th September 2003
Posts: 3,969
Blessings: 125,431 My Mood 
Reps: 3,198,177,063,204 (power: 3,198,177,075) | | Originally Posted by catmommy We had some in the church I grew up in that believed that you couldn't go to heaven without EGW. Unfortunately, for a few this one is true. However it is more about a misinformed individual than the denomination.
The guy who made it based it one _ONE_ guy's "testimony" on the forum. So I asked him: why did you believe him? Does believing him make it true?
__________________
Because the critics have not studied any subject in any sort of depth (at least 3,000 pages), they quite literally do not know how little they know. In fact, they don't even know that they don't know.
---
When they are wrong on the simple, why should you listen to them on the more complex?
---
One rule you can always count on: never, ever trust the critics on anything. They've proven that they cannot, and will not, tell you the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
---
I now have 99 authors in my plagiarism study. The critics still have zero. |
4th November 2009, 09:22 AM
| | Moderate SDA
61
| | Join Date: 8th September 2003
Posts: 3,969
Blessings: 125,431 My Mood
Reps: 3,198,177,063,204 (power: 3,198,177,075) | | | "Then she blamed the errors in the 1843 charts on GOD, for "hiding HER mistakes" !!!!!!!!!!" (11/4/2009)
__________________
Because the critics have not studied any subject in any sort of depth (at least 3,000 pages), they quite literally do not know how little they know. In fact, they don't even know that they don't know.
---
When they are wrong on the simple, why should you listen to them on the more complex?
---
One rule you can always count on: never, ever trust the critics on anything. They've proven that they cannot, and will not, tell you the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
---
I now have 99 authors in my plagiarism study. The critics still have zero. |
10th November 2009, 06:19 PM
| | Senior Member
 
| | Join Date: 3rd November 2003 Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 4,300
Blessings: 123,067 My Mood 
Reps: 43,142,721,089,286,216 (power: 0) | | 5. That Fannie Bolton wrote Steps to Christ. Isn't there proof of this? 
Last edited by k4c; 13th November 2009 at 06:41 AM.
|
14th November 2009, 12:38 PM
| | Moderate SDA
61
| | Join Date: 8th September 2003
Posts: 3,969
Blessings: 125,431 My Mood
Reps: 3,198,177,063,204 (power: 3,198,177,075) | | | Nope. And note that it was made long after Fannie Bolton died (June, 28 1926)--how convenient, eh?
Some of Steps to Christ had been written by Ellen White before Fannie Bolton had even been concieved, much less born!
__________________
Because the critics have not studied any subject in any sort of depth (at least 3,000 pages), they quite literally do not know how little they know. In fact, they don't even know that they don't know.
---
When they are wrong on the simple, why should you listen to them on the more complex?
---
One rule you can always count on: never, ever trust the critics on anything. They've proven that they cannot, and will not, tell you the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
---
I now have 99 authors in my plagiarism study. The critics still have zero. |
14th November 2009, 12:40 PM
| | Moderate SDA
61
| | Join Date: 8th September 2003
Posts: 3,969
Blessings: 125,431 My Mood
Reps: 3,198,177,063,204 (power: 3,198,177,075) | | | 50. "5. JESUS’ BROTHERS WERE OLDER THAN HE AND THEY WERE THE SONS OF JOSEPH AND SIDED WITH THE RABBIS.
EGW — YES: "All this displeased His brothers. Being older than Jesus, they felt that He should be under their dictation. His brothers, as the sons of Joseph were called, sided with the rabbis. They insisted that the traditions must be heeded, as if they were the requirements of God." (Desire of Ages, p.86,87).
Note: Not Biblical. ... How can Adventists claim that the Bible is the source of their faith and accept this as the truth, and do it with a straight face? The Bible clearly states that Jesus was the firstborn of Mary.(And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name JESUS.) How can the firstborn have older brothers?(Matthew 1:25; Luke 2:7)."
Where's the proof that Joseph didn't have sons before marrying Mary?
ROFL! They point to Matthew 1:25 and Luke 2:7 which clearly say "her firstborn"! What part of "her" was too hard to understand?
51. 7. ELLEN G. WHITE THE ONLY PROPHET GIVEN WINGS WHILE IN VISION.
>EGW — YES: "The Lord has given me a view of other worlds. Wings were given me, and an angel attended me from the city to a place that was bright and glorious." (Early Writings p.39).
Note that she didn't say that she was the only prophet to be given wings. What does that tell you when they lie like that? Hoping you wouldn't catch their lie? Did they think that you were too stupid to catch them?
__________________
Because the critics have not studied any subject in any sort of depth (at least 3,000 pages), they quite literally do not know how little they know. In fact, they don't even know that they don't know.
---
When they are wrong on the simple, why should you listen to them on the more complex?
---
One rule you can always count on: never, ever trust the critics on anything. They've proven that they cannot, and will not, tell you the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
---
I now have 99 authors in my plagiarism study. The critics still have zero. |
15th November 2009, 02:42 PM
| | Senior Member
| | Join Date: 3rd November 2003 Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 4,300
Blessings: 123,067 My Mood
Reps: 43,142,721,089,286,216 (power: 0) | | Originally Posted by djconklin Nope. And note that it was made long after Fannie Bolton died (June, 28 1926)--how convenient, eh?
Some of Steps to Christ had been written by Ellen White before Fannie Bolton had even been concieved, much less born! You confused me with your reply. Where did you get the date, June 28, 1926? Didn't Fannie work for EGW? |
15th November 2009, 02:43 PM
| | Senior Member
| | Join Date: 3rd November 2003 Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 4,300
Blessings: 123,067 My Mood
Reps: 43,142,721,089,286,216 (power: 0) | | Originally Posted by djconklin 50. "5. JESUS’ BROTHERS WERE OLDER THAN HE AND THEY WERE THE SONS OF JOSEPH AND SIDED WITH THE RABBIS.
EGW — YES: "All this displeased His brothers. Being older than Jesus, they felt that He should be under their dictation. His brothers, as the sons of Joseph were called, sided with the rabbis. They insisted that the traditions must be heeded, as if they were the requirements of God." (Desire of Ages, p.86,87).
Note: Not Biblical. ... How can Adventists claim that the Bible is the source of their faith and accept this as the truth, and do it with a straight face? The Bible clearly states that Jesus was the firstborn of Mary.(And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name JESUS.) How can the firstborn have older brothers?(Matthew 1:25; Luke 2:7)."
Where's the proof that Joseph didn't have sons before marrying Mary?
ROFL! They point to Matthew 1:25 and Luke 2:7 which clearly say "her firstborn"! What part of "her" was too hard to understand?
51. 7. ELLEN G. WHITE THE ONLY PROPHET GIVEN WINGS WHILE IN VISION.
>EGW — YES: "The Lord has given me a view of other worlds. Wings were given me, and an angel attended me from the city to a place that was bright and glorious." (Early Writings p.39).
Note that she didn't say that she was the only prophet to be given wings. What does that tell you when they lie like that? Hoping you wouldn't catch their lie? Did they think that you were too stupid to catch them? Are agreeing here that EGW gave unbiblical information?  |
15th November 2009, 09:14 PM
| | Moderate SDA
61
| | Join Date: 8th September 2003
Posts: 3,969
Blessings: 125,431 My Mood
Reps: 3,198,177,063,204 (power: 3,198,177,075) | | | 52. Is Ellen White the SDA Virgin mary? There seems to be a Catholic like reverence for Ellen G. White by SDA's.
__________________
Because the critics have not studied any subject in any sort of depth (at least 3,000 pages), they quite literally do not know how little they know. In fact, they don't even know that they don't know.
---
When they are wrong on the simple, why should you listen to them on the more complex?
---
One rule you can always count on: never, ever trust the critics on anything. They've proven that they cannot, and will not, tell you the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
---
I now have 99 authors in my plagiarism study. The critics still have zero. |
15th November 2009, 09:17 PM
| | Moderate SDA
61
| | Join Date: 8th September 2003
Posts: 3,969
Blessings: 125,431 My Mood
Reps: 3,198,177,063,204 (power: 3,198,177,075) | | Nope. And note that it was made long after Fannie Bolton died (June, 28 1926)--how convenient, eh?
Some of Steps to Christ had been written by Ellen White before Fannie Bolton had even been concieved, much less born!
You confused me with your reply. >That Fannie Bolton wrote Steps to Christ. You asked: Isn't there proof of this? The answer is no; some of Steps to Christ was written by Ellen White before Fannie had even been conceived. Where did you get the date, June 28, 1926? I did a web search for Fannie Bolton and one source said that she died on June 28, 1926 Didn't Fannie work for EGW? Yes. She transcribed Ellen White's handwriting mss.
__________________
Because the critics have not studied any subject in any sort of depth (at least 3,000 pages), they quite literally do not know how little they know. In fact, they don't even know that they don't know.
---
When they are wrong on the simple, why should you listen to them on the more complex?
---
One rule you can always count on: never, ever trust the critics on anything. They've proven that they cannot, and will not, tell you the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
---
I now have 99 authors in my plagiarism study. The critics still have zero.
Last edited by djconklin; 21st November 2009 at 01:42 AM.
| | |
| Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
| | |
