| Progressive/Moderate Adventists A forum for Progressive/Moderate Adventists. |  | | 
6th October 2009, 04:32 PM
|  | Just look through the telescope . . .
 | | Join Date: 13th December 2007
Posts: 1,346
Blessings: 53,016
Reps: 1,677,725,264,638,603 (power: 1,677,725,264,644) | | Originally Posted by believehim First, what prophet wasn't human.
Second, Are we speaking of seer's as in Daniel?
-b
Yes, we are all seers too. Some don't see very far - and some see quite far. This kind of sight is both given and developed. | 
6th October 2009, 05:28 PM
| | Newbie
 | | Join Date: 19th August 2009
Posts: 43
Blessings: 60,803
Reps: 80,409,140 (power: 80,412) | | Originally Posted by Avonia Yes, we are all seers too. Some don't see very far - and some see quite far. This kind of sight is both given and developed.
Hello friend!  And may I ask, to what are you drawing this info from?
-b | 
6th October 2009, 05:52 PM
|  | Just look through the telescope . . .
 | | Join Date: 13th December 2007
Posts: 1,346
Blessings: 53,016
Reps: 1,677,725,264,638,603 (power: 1,677,725,264,644) | | Originally Posted by believehim Hello friend!  And may I ask, to what are you drawing this info from?
-b
Experience.
We are capable of perceiving across a very large spectrum. But most of us perceive in only a narrow band. As children, we had a sense of many things we do not as adults - because some of our perceptual channels were much more open when we were very young. This is why some children are immediately so drawn - or repelled - by some people they meet. They have a sense for them in a way that's a bit different than our sense.
Dreams are a good example of this. For some people, precognitive dreams are commonplace. These people are not "seeing the future" per say - but they are perceiving in a slightly wider band than most people. So it looks like future-telling at first glace. But it is not.
Once understood, this kind of sight is just as ordinary as physical sight - but it is different. It's only extraordinary if you don't understand it.
Remember, for most of our history on the planet, you could have easily been burned at the stake for having a cell phone! A talking box - with the voices of people from "another place." Just image how demonic that would have seemed.
But we understand electromagnetism now. So, it's old hat.
The inexhaustible nature of God is reflected in the nature God's children. The gifts we've been able to develop are only the tip of the iceberg. Most of our potential would seem inconceivable - and frightening - from our current frame-of-reference. | 
7th October 2009, 11:25 PM
|  | Regular Member 52  | | Join Date: 25th February 2007 Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,850
Blessings: 1,473,192 My Mood
Reps: 22,848,769,056,729,436 (power: 22,848,769,056,735) | | Originally Posted by Avonia I doubt there is a switch, that when in the "on" position, creates a talking-head with a direct link.
That fact that we need a prophet to teach us an absolute, but are simultaneously in a position to evaluate him/her, is funny. I don't know if that's closer to illusion or delusion. We are all human prophets, and everyone's view is incomplete. Some views are more incomplete than others. The degree of dark in the "glass darkly" varies. But we evaluate each view offered in every way possible. So it's important to come into relationship with a view - not simply decide about it.
But it's much easier to assign - all or nothing - good/bad right/wrong God/Devil. But it's not very useful much of the time. 29Are all apostles? Are all prophets? Are all teachers? Do all work miracles? 30Do all have gifts of healing? Do all speak in tongues? Do all interpret? 31But eagerly desire the greater gifts. | 
8th October 2009, 11:47 AM
|  | Just look through the telescope . . .
 | | Join Date: 13th December 2007
Posts: 1,346
Blessings: 53,016
Reps: 1,677,725,264,638,603 (power: 1,677,725,264,644) | | Originally Posted by ricker 29Are all apostles? Are all prophets? Are all teachers? Do all work miracles? 30Do all have gifts of healing? Do all speak in tongues? Do all interpret? 31But eagerly desire the greater gifts.
Yes, but we tend to think of them (gifts) too discretely - as objects that you either have or you don't have.
The gifts show up all the way from so faint that it's really hard to notice - all the way to so strong it's impossible to miss.
The opportunity is to help each other bring them more into expression.
.
Last edited by Avonia; 8th October 2009 at 04:11 PM.
| 
14th October 2009, 02:40 PM
|  | The gospel is Jesus Christ!
 | | Join Date: 3rd May 2007
Posts: 3,611
Blessings: 6,084,103
Reps: 10,986,165,904,026,884 (power: 10,986,165,904,034) | | Originally Posted by Avonia Yes, we are all seers too. Some don't see very far - and some see quite far. This kind of sight is both given and developed.
In your opinion, if a person writes that masturbation leads to a weak brain, cancerous tumors, dropsy, weak eye sight, insanity, kidney and/or liver disease, memory loss, rheumatism and/or premature death, would this person qualify for (1) the category of "doesn't see very far," or (2) the category of "sees quite far?"
BFA | 
14th October 2009, 09:53 PM
|  | Just look through the telescope . . .
 | | Join Date: 13th December 2007
Posts: 1,346
Blessings: 53,016
Reps: 1,677,725,264,638,603 (power: 1,677,725,264,644) | | Originally Posted by Byfaithalone1 In your opinion, if a person writes that masturbation leads to a weak brain, cancerous tumors, dropsy, weak eye sight, insanity, kidney and/or liver disease, memory loss, rheumatism and/or premature death, would this person qualify for (1) the category of "doesn't see very far," or (2) the category of "sees quite far?"
BFA
It's a lot less crazy than many things in the Bible.
Do I think Ellen White had exceptional sight - yes. Do we know that what she said about masturbation is not true - yes. | 
15th October 2009, 01:34 PM
|  | The gospel is Jesus Christ!
 | | Join Date: 3rd May 2007
Posts: 3,611
Blessings: 6,084,103
Reps: 10,986,165,904,026,884 (power: 10,986,165,904,034) | | Originally Posted by Avonia It's a lot less crazy than many things in the Bible.
Such as? Do I think Ellen White had exceptional sight - yes. Do we know that what she said about masturbation is not true - yes.
So her exceptional sight was intermittant? How reliable is her exceptional sight?
BFA | 
15th October 2009, 05:10 PM
|  | Just look through the telescope . . .
 | | Join Date: 13th December 2007
Posts: 1,346
Blessings: 53,016
Reps: 1,677,725,264,638,603 (power: 1,677,725,264,644) | | Originally Posted by Byfaithalone1 Such as?
So her exceptional sight was intermittant? How reliable is her exceptional sight?
BFA
We are each exceptional - and incomplete. | 
16th October 2009, 07:15 AM
|  | Veteran 52  | | Join Date: 13th June 2006
Posts: 5,384
Blessings: 15,227,463 My Mood
Reps: 1,142,816,201,199,099,136 (power: 1,142,816,201,199,110) | | | With all that said Avonia, we desperately need a new catagory between true and false.
__________________ Let the Scriptures Determine Your Theology, Do Not Read Your Theology into Scripture. |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | | | |