| Mariology & Hagiography The forum to discuss the area of Christian theology concerned with Mary, the Mother of Jesus as well as the theology involving Saints. | |
View Poll Results: Did Mary have children after Jesus was born | |
Yes, I/we believe Mary had children after Jesus was born
|    | 47 | 46.53% | |
No. I/we believe she did not have children after Jesus
|    | 39 | 38.61% | |
I am not sure
|    | 9 | 8.91% | |
Does it matter?
|    | 17 | 16.83% |  | | 
22nd November 2009, 05:06 PM
|  | Regular Member
 | | Join Date: 17th July 2007 Location: Texas
Posts: 1,658
Blessings: 141,243 My Mood
Reps: 515,601,332,022,727 (power: 515,601,332,026) | | Originally Posted by Thekla
If one wants to rely on what is explicitly stated in the Bible, there really is nothing conclusive. So, to some extent, anything that one thinks about the adelphoi of Jesus -- other than the most general 'could be any number of relationships possible' -- any belief in a narrow meaning of adelphoi relies on tradition/Tradition (including the tradition/Tradition that they were children of Mary).
Exactly. Except some of us recognize the basis for our belief is indeed Tradition, and others do not. | 
22nd November 2009, 05:46 PM
|  | ASK ME ABOUT MY AVATAR 59 
| | Join Date: 7th March 2006 Location: RESIDENT ALIEN AND BULLY ON CF "BABYLON"
Posts: 72,827
Blessings: 6,732,372 My Mood
Reps: 5,252,031,191,169,265,664 (power: 5,252,031,191,169,343) | | Originally Posted by prodromos I dislike such images. John the Forerunner was only 6 months older than Jesus and both the Church and scripture only record their meeting twice, once while both were still in the womb and the second time at Jesus' baptism.
John QTF!
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
GT Fundies. Who are they? To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
quote FSTDT: From what I've seen, LLJ is a bit of a bible-quoting robot. Often he posts things in General Apologetics that are quite off-topic. At least he doesn't call Atheists deluded unlike most Christians. I think that he's too far gone to be saved at this point. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Hebrews 2:14 Therefore then, the children have partaken of flesh and blood and He in like manner did partake to the same. That thru the Death He might take-away the one having the power of the Death, that is the Devil To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | 
5th January 2010, 10:54 AM
|  | everlovin' shiner of light in dark places
 | | Join Date: 23rd March 2004
Posts: 97,845
Blessings: 1,075,326
Reps: 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 (power: 9,223,372,036,854,880) | | Originally Posted by LittleLambofJesus QTF! 
what does QTF mean?
__________________ ~~ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. ~~ "It is a kingly act to assist the fallen." ~Mother Teresa "Intense love does not measure, it just gives." ~Mother Teresa To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
| 
5th January 2010, 11:36 AM
|  | ICXC NIKA
 | | Join Date: 3rd April 2007 Location: Eastern Orthodox
Posts: 13,292
Blessings: 3,035,899
Reps: 167,846,914,526,061,984 (power: 167,846,914,526,077) | | Originally Posted by brinny what does QTF mean?
"quoted for truth"
I had to ask my son what it meant
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. dir="ltr"> I believe in one God, Father Almighty, Creator of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible. And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all ages; Light of Light, true God of true God, begotten, not created, of one essence with the Father through Whom all things were made.
Who for us men and for our salvation came down from heaven and was incarnate of the Holy Spirit and the Virgin Mary and became man.
He was crucified for us under Pontius Pilate, and suffered and was buried;
And He rose on the third day, according to the Scriptures.
He ascended into heaven and is seated at the right hand of the Father;
And He will come again with glory to judge the living and dead. His kingdom shall have no end.
And in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the Creator of life, Who proceeds from the Father, Who together with the Father and the Son is worshipped and glorified, Who spoke through the prophets.
In one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church.
I confess one baptism for the forgiveness of sins.
I look for the resurrection of the dead
and the life of the age to come.
Amen. | 
5th January 2010, 11:47 AM
|  | Born-again Liberal Episcopalian 61  | | Join Date: 4th September 2003 Location: USA
Posts: 8,988
Blessings: 2,112,138
Reps: 6,653,386,691,345,151 (power: 6,653,386,691,360) | | Originally Posted by Thekla "quoted for truth"
I had to ask my son what it meant 
"Quoted, truth for"
Remember, LLOJ is the man who is singlehandedly producing the Yoda Standard Version of the Bible!
__________________ "It is written, 'My house shall be a house of prayer,' but you have made it a den of thieves." -Jesus | 
5th January 2010, 11:52 AM
|  | ICXC NIKA
 | | Join Date: 3rd April 2007 Location: Eastern Orthodox
Posts: 13,292
Blessings: 3,035,899
Reps: 167,846,914,526,061,984 (power: 167,846,914,526,077) | |
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. dir="ltr"> I believe in one God, Father Almighty, Creator of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible. And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all ages; Light of Light, true God of true God, begotten, not created, of one essence with the Father through Whom all things were made.
Who for us men and for our salvation came down from heaven and was incarnate of the Holy Spirit and the Virgin Mary and became man.
He was crucified for us under Pontius Pilate, and suffered and was buried;
And He rose on the third day, according to the Scriptures.
He ascended into heaven and is seated at the right hand of the Father;
And He will come again with glory to judge the living and dead. His kingdom shall have no end.
And in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the Creator of life, Who proceeds from the Father, Who together with the Father and the Son is worshipped and glorified, Who spoke through the prophets.
In one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church.
I confess one baptism for the forgiveness of sins.
I look for the resurrection of the dead
and the life of the age to come.
Amen. | 
8th January 2010, 10:34 PM
| | Newbie
 | | Join Date: 1st January 2010
Posts: 19
Blessings: 24,101
Reps: 141,956,774,629,653 (power: 141,956,774,630) | | | Here is a question that all may feel free to answer. Suppose the Scriptures teach that the Theotokos bore other children after she gave birth to Christ. Why then did the Fathers who compiled those Scriptures believe in her ever-virginity, and even felt the need to defend her it? It was not as though they were ignorant of the Scriptures, for these Fathers wrote plenty of Scriptural commentary. If the Scriptures are as clear as the Protestant thinks, then why do Orthodox and even many Protestants believe the Theotokos is ever-virgin? Could it be that each tradition interprets the Scriptures from within a different school of thought? Why discard the Orthodox interpretion out of hand and why the need for Evangelicals to believe the Virgin had sex?
And I would be careful not to use the Scriptures that say Christ is "the carpenter's son," first because He was NOT St. Joseph's son - He had no human father, for He is the Unbegotten Son of God the Father - and second because this was spoken by unbelievers. | 
11th January 2010, 01:12 PM
| | Veteran 58  | | Join Date: 13th May 2008 Location: Davenport, Iowa
Posts: 6,349
Blessings: 1,160,360
Reps: 15,701,872,129,395,480 (power: 15,701,872,129,403) | | Originally Posted by drichards85 Here is a question that all may feel free to answer. Suppose the Scriptures teach that the Theotokos bore other children after she gave birth to Christ. Why then did the Fathers who compiled those Scriptures believe in her ever-virginity, and even felt the need to defend her it? It was not as though they were ignorant of the Scriptures, for these Fathers wrote plenty of Scriptural commentary. If the Scriptures are as clear as the Protestant thinks, then why do Orthodox and even many Protestants believe the Theotokos is ever-virgin? Could it be that each tradition interprets the Scriptures from within a different school of thought? Why discard the Orthodox interpretion out of hand and why the need for Evangelicals to believe the Virgin had sex?
And I would be careful not to use the Scriptures that say Christ is "the carpenter's son," first because He was NOT St. Joseph's son - He had no human father, for He is the Unbegotten Son of God the Father - and second because this was spoken by unbelievers.
The OP is about siblings of Jesus Christ, not about the Eternal Virginity of Mary. As a former poster (CaliforniaJosiah) was fond of pointing out, only one denomination has elevated that doctrine to the level of dogma requisite for salvation and that is the Catholic Church. Although the obvious implication of the OP is that siblings would clearly indicate that Joseph and Mary engaged in marital intimacy, marital intimacy frequently does not result in conception and birth. If you wish to engage in discussing the proofs that Joseph and Mary never engaged in marital intimacy ever, then I can dig up one of CJ's threads for you. Here is one of the livelier threads - http://www.christianforums.com/t7366435/ | 
11th January 2010, 01:30 PM
|  | Regular Member
 | | Join Date: 17th July 2007 Location: Texas
Posts: 1,658
Blessings: 141,243 My Mood
Reps: 515,601,332,022,727 (power: 515,601,332,026) | | Originally Posted by bbbbbbb The OP is about siblings of Jesus Christ, not about the Eternal Virginity of Mary. As a former poster (CaliforniaJosiah) was fond of pointing out, only one denomination has elevated that doctrine to the level of dogma requisite for salvation and that is the Catholic Church. Although the obvious implication of the OP is that siblings would clearly indicate that Joseph and Mary engaged in marital intimacy, marital intimacy frequently does not result in conception and birth. If you wish to engage in discussing the proofs that Joseph and Mary never engaged in marital intimacy ever, then I can dig up one of CJ's threads for you. Here is one of the livelier threads - http://www.christianforums.com/t7366435/
The Orthodox can correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe they too view the doctrine of the ever-virginity of Mary as dogma as it was established at one of the early councils which we all accept. | 
11th January 2010, 01:38 PM
| | Newbie
 | | Join Date: 1st January 2010
Posts: 19
Blessings: 24,101
Reps: 141,956,774,629,653 (power: 141,956,774,630) | | | Perpetual Virginity was never declared dogma by the Orthodox Church. We don't believe something has to be "dogma" in order to be important or believed by all the faithful. |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | | | |