Origins TheologyForum for the discussion of Creation Science (Young/Old) vs Theistic Evolution. Discussion of Atheistic Evolution should be taken to the Discussion and Debate forums.
Cmon PastorKevin, you can't just post a super long video, expect people to watch it, then not even respond to it. At least respond to the questions about which parts you think are most convincing.
Silly drive by posts.
__________________ "The Bible does not lend any moral support to natural selection...Ergo, natural selection is not a process that human beings should support." - SkyWriting
It only reinforces our belief that most creationists don't really understand all the stuff they're being told.
Yes, and unfortunately Creationists are an extremely high-profile segment of Christians, and its people like this who cause Christians to have such a bad reputation in the scientific community.
I personally think the evidence that young earth creationism is pseudo-science is more convincing. I'm not saying that the OP believes in young earth creationism. I don't know what he believes. I did not check his profile. That said, I am not opposed to the idea that God created the universe in 6 literal 24 hour days but I am opposed to the idea that the earth is only 10,000 years or less old. I mean, why would God deceive us by making the earth appear to be billions of years old if it were really only 10,000 years old? I don't think He would.
I'm not saying that the OP believes in young earth creationism. I don't know what he believes. I did not check his profile. That said, I am not opposed to the idea that God created the universe in 6 literal 24 hour days but I am opposed to the idea that the earth is only 10,000 years or less old. I mean, why would God deceive us by making the earth appear to be billions of years old if it were really only 10,000 years old? I don't think He would. 
Linear Mode
