| Origins Theology Forum for the discussion of Creation Science (Young/Old) vs Theistic Evolution. Discussion of Atheistic Evolution should be taken to the Discussion and Debate forums. |  | 
1st August 2009, 12:01 PM
| | Newbie
 | | Join Date: 1st August 2009
Posts: 1
Blessings: 62,748
Reps: 10 (power: 0) | | | why use different material to form us? Genesis 2:7
the LORD God formed the man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being.
Genesis 2:19
Now the LORD God had formed out of the ground all the beasts of the field and all the birds of the air. He brought them to the man to see what he would name them; and whatever the man called each living creature, that was its name.
from the scripture above, we know that the man was made from the dust but the beasts was made from ground. why use different material? | 
1st August 2009, 12:30 PM
|  | Senior Member 56  | | Join Date: 12th January 2008
Posts: 6,150
Blessings: 16,830,008 My Mood
Reps: 2,296,392,850,439,835,136 (power: 2,296,392,850,439,846) | | | I don't think that it implies that God used different material.....we are all, including animals made up of minerals etc which are in the earth
__________________ Maranatha! | 
1st August 2009, 12:48 PM
|  | Basically pulling an Obama (Thanks Calminian!) 51  | | Join Date: 31st March 2006 Location: Wales
Posts: 12,367
Blessings: 27,003,733 My Mood
Reps: 1,984,022,293,840,305,920 (power: 1,984,022,293,840,324) | | Originally Posted by freeagan Genesis 2:7
the LORD Godformed the man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being.
Genesis 2:19
Now the LORD God had formed out of the ground all the beasts of the field and all the birds of the air. He brought them to the man to see what he would name them; and whatever the man called each living creature, that was its name.
from the scripture above, we know that the man was made from the dust but the beasts was made from ground. why use different material?
It is the same material, you just have a little more detail in the creation of man, 'the dust of the ground' rather than simply 'the ground'.
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
When you come to the Ammonites, do not
harass them or provoke them. Deut 2:19 | 
1st August 2009, 01:29 PM
|  | Senior Veteran 29 
| | Join Date: 6th March 2006
Posts: 6,088
Blessings: 53,526
Reps: 18,889,155,825,852,136 (power: 18,889,155,825,864) | | | I'm more curious to know why God is described as having made some animals out of water and some out of dirt. Does this imply that all aquatic creatures should be genetically more similar relative to terrestrial ones?
__________________ "There is evidence for evolution, gobs and gobs of it. It is not just speculation or a faith choice or an assumption or a religion. It is a productive framework for lots of biological research, and it has amazing explanatory power. There is no conspiracy to hide the truth about the failure of evolution. There has really been no failure of evolution as a scientific theory. It works, and it works well." -- creation scientist Dr. Todd Wood | 
3rd August 2009, 10:29 AM
|  | Veteran 59  | | Join Date: 5th April 2007
Posts: 9,295
Blessings: 124,508
Reps: 44,404,246,110,554,912 (power: 44,404,246,110,568) | | Originally Posted by Mallon I'm more curious to know why God is described as having made some animals out of water and some out of dirt. Does this imply that all aquatic creatures should be genetically more similar relative to terrestrial ones?
You will accuse me to interpret the Bible literally, but I think it is pretty metaphoric :
The ground or the dust (include dust in water), they contain metal ions. The water, none (H does not count). That is why. | 
3rd August 2009, 11:12 AM
| | Member 46  | | Join Date: 20th August 2008 Location: The Great South Land of the Holy Spirit
Posts: 1,039
Blessings: 34,768 My Mood
Reps: 219,801,598,516,757 (power: 219,801,598,521) | | | I am curious to know where it is stated that God formed some animals out of water?
__________________ loud graphical signatures are against my religion. | 
3rd August 2009, 11:48 AM
|  | Senior Veteran 29 
| | Join Date: 6th March 2006
Posts: 6,088
Blessings: 53,526
Reps: 18,889,155,825,852,136 (power: 18,889,155,825,864) | | Originally Posted by marktheblake I am curious to know where it is stated that God formed some animals out of water?
Genesis 1:20.
__________________ "There is evidence for evolution, gobs and gobs of it. It is not just speculation or a faith choice or an assumption or a religion. It is a productive framework for lots of biological research, and it has amazing explanatory power. There is no conspiracy to hide the truth about the failure of evolution. There has really been no failure of evolution as a scientific theory. It works, and it works well." -- creation scientist Dr. Todd Wood | 
3rd August 2009, 12:11 PM
| | Member 46  | | Join Date: 20th August 2008 Location: The Great South Land of the Holy Spirit
Posts: 1,039
Blessings: 34,768 My Mood
Reps: 219,801,598,516,757 (power: 219,801,598,521) | | | Genesis 1:20 "teemed" equals formed?
KJV says 'bring forth abundantly' but the root word isn't giving me much confidence in interpreting it as 'formed from'
and in the same sentence birds are mentioned and they are not formed from water, see the later mention in Gen 2:19
If it does mean fish are formed from water, seems strange that its not mentioned what birds are formed from in the same sentence as a distinction.
If it does not mean fish were formed from water, seems strange we are not told elsewhere then.
__________________ loud graphical signatures are against my religion. | 
4th August 2009, 03:13 PM
| | | Material is synonymous with Substance, and is anything made of matter - hydrogen, air and water are all examples of materials. Sometimes the term Material is used more narrowly to refer to substances or components with certain physical properties which are used as inputs to production or manufacturing. In this sense, materials are the pieces required to make something else, from buildings and art to stars and computers.
A material can be anything: a finished product in its own right or an unprocessed raw material. Raw materials are first extracted or harvested from the earth and divided into a form that can be easily transported and stored, then processed to produce semi-finished materials. These can be input into a new cycle of production and finishing processes to create finished materials, ready for distribution, construction, and consumption.
An example of a raw material is cotton, which is harvested from plants, and can then be processed into thread (also considered a raw material), which can then be woven into cloth, a semi-finished material. Cutting and sewing the fabric turns it into a garment, which is a finished material. Steelmaking is another example—raw materials in the form of ore are mined, refined and processed into steel, a semi-finished material. Steel is then used as an input in many other industries to make finished products. | 
6th August 2009, 08:59 AM
|  | Veteran 59  | | Join Date: 5th April 2007
Posts: 9,295
Blessings: 124,508
Reps: 44,404,246,110,554,912 (power: 44,404,246,110,568) | | | Some one argued that if we were made of clay, which is a silicate, then why are we mostly made of C, N, and H? (oxygen is not a problem).
My response is: Name one element in us, but is not found in clay.
The fact is: If we were not made of clay, then the above question will not stand.
(note: clays are capable to contain all existed elements in their molecular structure like potpourris) |  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | | | |