| Exploring Christianity A Forum for Non Christians to explore Christianity with Christians. |  | | 
27th July 2009, 03:08 PM
|  | Contributor 23 
| | Join Date: 21st March 2005 Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 15,587
Blessings: 50,320,590 My Mood
Reps: 273,058,856,457,603,328 (power: 273,058,856,457,625) | | Originally Posted by Chesterton What do you mean? Are you referring just to creation/young earth ideas, or something more?
No no, nothing like that, though I can see how you got that. No, I'm talking about how Christians who say that God is omniscient are contradicting our understanding of the universe. A quantum mechanical universe is not deterministic: there are inherent limits on what you can know. An omniscience can't exist because the concept makes no sense in an indeterministic, quantum mechanical universe. Since our best understanding of the universe is that it is quantum mechanical (though that's not likely the end of the story), there's a paradox.
One has to give  .
__________________ "I am a scientist... when I find evidence that my theories are wrong, it is as exciting as if the evidence proved them right." - Stargate: SG1 "A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, -- a mere heart of stone." - Charles Darwin "What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof." - Christopher Hitchens "Protecting the sanctity of marriage against people who want to get married" - Anonymous Got a question about science? To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. ! | 
27th July 2009, 08:33 PM
|  | Born Imperishable

| | Join Date: 23rd February 2004
Posts: 23,369
Blessings: 415,098,645 My Mood
Reps: 664,114,628,762,749,312 (power: 664,114,628,762,780) | | God isn't limited by his creation. Whatever this system may be is part of his creation. Originally Posted by Wiccan_Child No, I'm talking about how Christians who say that God is omniscient are contradicting our understanding of the universe.
Maybe we don't perfectly understand the universe. Maybe most of what we think we know about it is wrong.
__________________ Every word of God is flawless; He is a shield to those who take refuge in Him.
Do not add to His words, or He will rebuke you and prove you a liar.
- Proverbs 30:5-6
Sovereignty is not racism. | 
27th July 2009, 09:43 PM
|  | Contributor 23 
| | Join Date: 21st March 2005 Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 15,587
Blessings: 50,320,590 My Mood
Reps: 273,058,856,457,603,328 (power: 273,058,856,457,625) | | Originally Posted by twistedsketch God isn't limited by his creation. Whatever this system may be is part of his creation.
Since we're talking about his creation, doesn't that seem moot? If his creation has fundamental limitations to what can be known about it, why would God be exempt from that? It's like saying God can violate basic arithmetic: 1 + 1 does equal 2 (in base 10, at least); God himself cannot change that. Originally Posted by twistedsketch Maybe we don't perfectly understand the universe. Maybe most of what we think we know about it is wrong.
Like I said: something has to give. In your case, you appear to give precedence to God: he is omniscient, and its our understanding of knowledge (and, thus, quantum mechanics) that is wrong.
__________________ "I am a scientist... when I find evidence that my theories are wrong, it is as exciting as if the evidence proved them right." - Stargate: SG1 "A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, -- a mere heart of stone." - Charles Darwin "What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof." - Christopher Hitchens "Protecting the sanctity of marriage against people who want to get married" - Anonymous Got a question about science? To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. ! | 
27th July 2009, 10:23 PM
|  | Born Imperishable

| | Join Date: 23rd February 2004
Posts: 23,369
Blessings: 415,098,645 My Mood
Reps: 664,114,628,762,749,312 (power: 664,114,628,762,780) | | Originally Posted by Wiccan_Child Since we're talking about his creation, doesn't that seem moot? If his creation has fundamental limitations to what can be known about it, why would God be exempt from that?
Because God is distinct from his creation. Originally Posted by Wiccan_Child Like I said: something has to give. In your case, you appear to give precedence to God: he is omniscient, and its our understanding of knowledge (and, thus, quantum mechanics) that is wrong.
Right. He is omniscient. Nothing can truly disprove that.
__________________ Every word of God is flawless; He is a shield to those who take refuge in Him.
Do not add to His words, or He will rebuke you and prove you a liar.
- Proverbs 30:5-6
Sovereignty is not racism. | 
28th July 2009, 08:25 AM
|  | Contributor 23 
| | Join Date: 21st March 2005 Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 15,587
Blessings: 50,320,590 My Mood
Reps: 273,058,856,457,603,328 (power: 273,058,856,457,625) | | Originally Posted by twistedsketch Because God is distinct from his creation.
The limitations exist nonetheless. If the universe is quantum mechanical, then omniscience is a logical paradox. Even God can't make a paradox. That God is distinct from his creation doesn't change this. Originally Posted by twistedsketch Right. He is omniscient. Nothing can truly disprove that.
Except, of course, a carefully worded refutation  .
__________________ "I am a scientist... when I find evidence that my theories are wrong, it is as exciting as if the evidence proved them right." - Stargate: SG1 "A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, -- a mere heart of stone." - Charles Darwin "What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof." - Christopher Hitchens "Protecting the sanctity of marriage against people who want to get married" - Anonymous Got a question about science? To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. ! | 
28th July 2009, 08:46 AM
|  | Born Imperishable

| | Join Date: 23rd February 2004
Posts: 23,369
Blessings: 415,098,645 My Mood
Reps: 664,114,628,762,749,312 (power: 664,114,628,762,780) | | Originally Posted by Wiccan_Child The limitations exist nonetheless. If the universe is quantum mechanical, then omniscience is a logical paradox. Even God can't make a paradox. That God is distinct from his creation doesn't change this.
But you're making these assumptions which we don't know are true. God is not bound by what we can determine.
__________________ Every word of God is flawless; He is a shield to those who take refuge in Him.
Do not add to His words, or He will rebuke you and prove you a liar.
- Proverbs 30:5-6
Sovereignty is not racism. | 
28th July 2009, 02:20 PM
|  | Contributor 23 
| | Join Date: 21st March 2005 Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 15,587
Blessings: 50,320,590 My Mood
Reps: 273,058,856,457,603,328 (power: 273,058,856,457,625) | | Originally Posted by twistedsketch But you're making these assumptions which we don't know are true.
What assumptions, exactly? Originally Posted by twistedsketch God is not bound by what we can determine.
On the contrary, he is: when we use logic to prove this or that, the proven statement is true. It's not just true for 'our' universe, it's true regardless of what else is true (no matter what God does, A is identical to itself).
__________________ "I am a scientist... when I find evidence that my theories are wrong, it is as exciting as if the evidence proved them right." - Stargate: SG1 "A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, -- a mere heart of stone." - Charles Darwin "What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof." - Christopher Hitchens "Protecting the sanctity of marriage against people who want to get married" - Anonymous Got a question about science? To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. ! | 
28th July 2009, 06:32 PM
| | Gimme That Old Time Religion
 | | Join Date: 24th May 2008 Location: 'neath the marquee moon
Posts: 6,132
Blessings: 12,363,274
Reps: 474,698,394,322,854,976 (power: 474,698,394,322,865) | | Originally Posted by Wiccan_Child On the contrary, he is: when we use logic to prove this or that, the proven statement is true. It's not just true for 'our' universe, it's true regardless of what else is true (no matter what God does, A is identical to itself).
How can you be so confident that the logic which applies in this reality must apply in any possible reality? If you were a two dimensional being living in a two dimensional universe, wouldn't a cube defy logic, and be impossible? I guess you wouldn't be able to even imagine the idea of a cube.
As you increase dimensions, as from a point, to a line, a square, a cube, things become possible which were not possible before. Christianity makes odd claims, no doubt, such as omniscience, and a single God who is three persons, and a being who is fully human and fully God at the same time. But there's a sense in which I think these types of things are almost intuitive. If there's a reality above this one ("above" in the sense of being larger than, and more encompassing and comprehending of this one), I might expect it could very well be like the thing which Christianity vaguely hints at. | 
28th July 2009, 07:08 PM
|  | Contributor 23 
| | Join Date: 21st March 2005 Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 15,587
Blessings: 50,320,590 My Mood
Reps: 273,058,856,457,603,328 (power: 273,058,856,457,625) | | Originally Posted by Chesterton How can you be so confident that the logic which applies in this reality must apply in any possible reality?
Because the truth of logic isn't determined by whatever reality the individual finds himself. "1 + 1 = 2" is a true statement, and it remains true without any reference to reality or external factors. Originally Posted by Chesterton If you were a two dimensional being living in a two dimensional universe, wouldn't a cube defy logic, and be impossible? I guess you wouldn't be able to even imagine the idea of a cube.
But that doesn't mean it's logically impossible. We 3D creatures have evolved to comprehend three spatial dimensions, but have never needed to comprehend a fourth. Using mathematics (ironically), we can completely describe objects in higher dimensions, and even image them. Enter the terrasect:
Counter-intuitivity just makes things hard to imagine. It doesn't make them logically impossible.
But logical paradoxes are impossible. Even if we accept that somehow logic somehow stops working when you get to God's level, there's still one problem: we're talking about the real world, about the world in which logic does apply. Originally Posted by Chesterton Christianity makes odd claims, no doubt, such as omniscience, and a single God who is three persons, and a being who is fully human and fully God at the same time. But there's a sense in which I think these types of things are almost intuitive. If there's a reality above this one ("above" in the sense of being larger than, and more encompassing and comprehending of this one), I might expect it could very well be like the thing which Christianity vaguely hints at.
Well, that's because you're a Christian  . Hindus and Buddhists probably imagine the 'higher' reality to be something more akin to that described by Dharmic philosophies.
__________________ "I am a scientist... when I find evidence that my theories are wrong, it is as exciting as if the evidence proved them right." - Stargate: SG1 "A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, -- a mere heart of stone." - Charles Darwin "What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof." - Christopher Hitchens "Protecting the sanctity of marriage against people who want to get married" - Anonymous Got a question about science? To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. ! | 
28th July 2009, 09:48 PM
| | Gimme That Old Time Religion
 | | Join Date: 24th May 2008 Location: 'neath the marquee moon
Posts: 6,132
Blessings: 12,363,274
Reps: 474,698,394,322,854,976 (power: 474,698,394,322,865) | | Originally Posted by Wiccan_Child Because the truth of logic isn't determined by whatever reality the individual finds himself.
How can you know this? You've only ever been in the one reality you're working with now. "1 + 1 = 2" is a true statement, and it remains true without any reference to reality or external factors.
You have to reference every logic statement to this reality, don't you? I mean, you're in it. But that doesn't mean it's logically impossible. We 3D creatures have evolved to comprehend three spatial dimensions, but have never needed to comprehend a fourth. Using mathematics (ironically), we can completely describe objects in higher dimensions, and even image them. Enter the terrasect:
Counter-intuitivity just makes things hard to imagine. It doesn't make them logically impossible.
Can you explain how a terrasect is 4-dimensional? I only see height, width and length; a cube inside a larger, mishapen cube. But logical paradoxes are impossible. Even if we accept that somehow logic somehow stops working when you get to God's level, there's still one problem: we're talking about the real world, about the world in which logic does apply.
I agree that a contradiction is impossible, but I don't think that what makes for a contradiction in one time and place has to make for a contradiction in another time and place (or in the absence of time and place: eternity). Well, that's because you're a Christian  . Hindus and Buddhists probably imagine the 'higher' reality to be something more akin to that described by Dharmic philosophies.
It doesn't make sense to me because I'm a Christian; I'm a Christian because it makes sense to me. |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | | | |