As I pointed out he is a specialist in the area of what science is and what constitutes scientific theory and argument.
What? He is a specialist in applying the scientific theory. That's the definition of all scientists lol.
No legitimate scientist would argue that a paper or book with sound reasoning and citations is worthless because the author is not an exact specialist in an area. In the end, disparaging ID via appealing to authority is still a faulty argument.
I never said it was completely worthless, just worth less than a book by a specialist. The reason this isn't very useful is he is challenging the consensus of the majority of specialists, so why would I take his word over there's? I have absolutely no reason to listen to him over many specialists.
"appealing to authority" is such a weak argument in my opinion. You yourself are appealing to it when you attempted to call him:
"he is a specialist in the area of what science is and what constitutes scientific theory and argument"
So it's not ok for others to appeal to authority, only you?