Wasn't it only the amendment that supposedly wasn't debated?
It looked like the result of corrections and clarifications which probably were debated.
I don't know the timeline between the introduction of the bill and the vote but the first i heard of the issue even being in congress was that it had passed. If it had followed a typical debate cycle, I think it would have been on the news or something. I know that not every bill is reported on but something that signifiant usually is.
The passage of all bills is corrupt? I don't know that and I suspect you don't either. I doubt you know of every bill passed.
Corrupt as in them working for their own goals and agendas, the will, and the good of the people and the country be damned.
You can't judge everyone on what you would do.
They didn't even read the bill, how can they not be corrupt?
That doesn't follow. They can be not corrupt if they've been apprised of the major provisions of the bill and believe it is in the best interests of the people of the US. They have staff to read bills, summarize them and to raise alerts. Have you heard of delegation? It's what people with staff do, it's why they have staff.
__________________ - Daisy
you're means you are
your means it belongs to you
yore means days long past
Their corruption is apparent and obvious for anyone with a brain. If you truely had no intention of condoning their wrongdoings, you would have called them out on it, instead of pointing to their wrongdoings of your opponent like the biased person you are. And I do know the extent of your bias.
I have no problem lambasting both sides, because they are equally deserving of it. Yet your almost incapable of critisizing your own side, making you a witless pawn to their corruption and power-mongering.
Congrats, you're part of the problem.
I dont have a side. I am on the outside looking in. Signing a bill without reading is negligent, wrong and disturbing. It is not necessarily corrupt, and unless you can prove any corruption you are wrong. So far you have proven nothing except throw stuff against the wall and hoping that it sticks. I though that those who signed the patriot act were negligent and wrong however I did not suspect corruption. This corruption talk is yours....prove it.
So... what was running the country before this administration?
So... what do you stand for more of the same or worse? I am American before I am the party! I believe in the confines of the Constitution of the USA. In a republic, in which it stands, under one Nation, Under God, with Liberty and justice for ALL
Linear Mode
