Creation & EvolutionForum for the discussion of this important topic. This forum is open to non-believers. There is a Christians-only forum in the Christians-only section too.
Again why should I trust science.? no reason to "trust" it at all.
Says the person using a computer
__________________
"I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use." Galileo Galilei
"Telling me the ToE is wrong is like telling a car mechanic
the internal combustion engine runs on magic."- Blayz
The POINT of Creationism, from an honest Creationist
"And yes, to prove evolution is wrong does not mean creation is right. But, the goal is just that, to prove evolution is wrong. Nothing else."
-juvenissun
it is not updated but proved flat out wrong so...why beliveve it? I mean years of taking one drug and studies done on that certain drug....and then one day that is the cause of serious disease....Again why should I trust science.? no reason to "trust" it at all. The reason I do 'follow' it is that the alternative given is not paid by most insurances really... Otherwise, conventional medicine is fairly new and trad. medicine is eons long.(botanical holistic) ..AGain no reason to "trust" science that is seems that is it nothing more than the blind leading the blind....
So I take it you've never used aspirin, penicilin, nyquil... never been vacinated.. and, if you have kids, you've never provided any of these things to your children?
Regardless, evidence that a drug is safe is still evidence. New evidence that later reveals the drug causes a different condition after a period of use it just that, "new evidence". The previous evidence is not "flat out wrong", it was just valid for the conditions it was gathered under.
All of us take drugs derived from research based on the theory of evolution, and the track-record is pretty good. I believe that answers your drug-question.
As for the rest of your post, it simply demonstrates that you know exactly nothing about science, and that you don't even understand what the word "theory" means.
so you need to know a lot about science to find out that studies contradict each other in scientific theories? I think not..
__________________ No one on this earth can avoid affliction; and although the
afflictions which the Lord sends are not great men imagine them
beyond their strength and are crushed by them. This is because
they will not humble their souls and commit themselves to the will
of God. But the Lord Himself guides with His grace those who are
given over to God's will, and they bear all things with fortitude
for the sake of God Whom they have so loved and with Whom they are
glorified for ever. It is impossible to escape tribulation in this
world but the man who is giver over to the will of God bears
tribulation easily, seeing it but putting his trust in the Lord,
and so his tribulations pass.
This specimen's kind of ingratitude to the men and women dedicating their lives to making human life
So... if one is a natural medecine follower is necessarily judging those who do convenstional medicine. You are putting words in my mouth I did not say. I have an opinion and I have a right to teach my child whatever I want her to learn not what science teaches her. Anyhow natural medicine been around for centuries than a conventional medicine... for example. So why would I want to teach my child a theory that has no proof ? And anyways that is my choice as a parent not the school's...
__________________ No one on this earth can avoid affliction; and although the
afflictions which the Lord sends are not great men imagine them
beyond their strength and are crushed by them. This is because
they will not humble their souls and commit themselves to the will
of God. But the Lord Himself guides with His grace those who are
given over to God's will, and they bear all things with fortitude
for the sake of God Whom they have so loved and with Whom they are
glorified for ever. It is impossible to escape tribulation in this
world but the man who is giver over to the will of God bears
tribulation easily, seeing it but putting his trust in the Lord,
and so his tribulations pass.
So... if one is a natural medecine follower is necessarily judging those who do convenstional medicine. You are putting words in my mouth I did not say. I have an opinion and I have a right to teach my child whatever I want her to learn not what science teaches her. Anyhow natural medicine been around for centuries than a conventional medicine... for example. So why would I want to teach my child a theory that has no proof ? And anyways that is my choice as a parent not the school's...
Originally Posted by Jester4kicks
So I take it you've never used aspirin, penicilin, nyquil... never been vacinated.. and, if you have kids, you've never provided any of these things to your children?
New evidence that later reveals the drug causes a different condition after a period of use it just that, "new evidence". The previous evidence is not "flat out wrong", it was just valid for the conditions it was gathered under.
I understanf that Jester but still does not cut it. Why impose as "truth" something that could "change" ? That is the principle of what science is that is not "stable" ...The variants change and sometimes are flat out wrong. Those scientists even say the findings "could" be wrong.
__________________ No one on this earth can avoid affliction; and although the
afflictions which the Lord sends are not great men imagine them
beyond their strength and are crushed by them. This is because
they will not humble their souls and commit themselves to the will
of God. But the Lord Himself guides with His grace those who are
given over to God's will, and they bear all things with fortitude
for the sake of God Whom they have so loved and with Whom they are
glorified for ever. It is impossible to escape tribulation in this
world but the man who is giver over to the will of God bears
tribulation easily, seeing it but putting his trust in the Lord,
and so his tribulations pass.
What I am saying is that I will take nightquil but I will not be supriced if I for example get liver cancer from it .... because "new finding" bla bla.... So that is why although science benefits a lot also is not a mandra to live by it is just a tool... and an unreliable one. So why teach my child she has to put her "trust' is something so ephimeral and not God....
__________________ No one on this earth can avoid affliction; and although the
afflictions which the Lord sends are not great men imagine them
beyond their strength and are crushed by them. This is because
they will not humble their souls and commit themselves to the will
of God. But the Lord Himself guides with His grace those who are
given over to God's will, and they bear all things with fortitude
for the sake of God Whom they have so loved and with Whom they are
glorified for ever. It is impossible to escape tribulation in this
world but the man who is giver over to the will of God bears
tribulation easily, seeing it but putting his trust in the Lord,
and so his tribulations pass.
I understanf that Jester but still does not cut it. Why impose as "truth" something that could "change" ? That is the principle of what science is that is not "stable" ...The variants change and sometimes are flat out wrong. Those scientists even say the findings "could" be wrong.
So why teach my child she has to put her "trust' is something so ephimeral and not God....
The contradictory humor in this one statement says it all for me
__________________
"I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use." Galileo Galilei
"Telling me the ToE is wrong is like telling a car mechanic
the internal combustion engine runs on magic."- Blayz
The POINT of Creationism, from an honest Creationist
"And yes, to prove evolution is wrong does not mean creation is right. But, the goal is just that, to prove evolution is wrong. Nothing else."
-juvenissun
Linear Mode
