3rd June 2009, 08:47 PM
|
 | 40,000 men and women everyday, re-define happiness
   
 | | Join Date: 11th August 2006
Posts: 6,046
Blessings: 1,648,713
Reps: 12,763,127,797,475,148 (power: 12,763,127,797,485) | |
Originally Posted by peace4ever  A link in a chain is always something in the middle linking one end of a chain to the other. But since scientists don't know who the common ancestor is, then they only have one end of the chain, namely, humans, not both. So until they know who the common ancestor is, they can't possibly know what the links of the chain lead to on the other end!
Thus, they find any bones they want to and claim it's the missing link.  the latest "missing link" looks more like a lizard than a human. So are they now claiming that a giant lizard was the common ancestor?  Or, since they don't know who the common ancestor is, because he's as imaginary as each individual imagination then they can claim that the bones of any animal is the common ancestor?  Or can they just plain claim anything they want to since the world believes they're infallible gods because they have degrees? I suspect it's the latter. 
Hold on... ridiculous overuse of smilies... weird fixation on the idea that there is ONE common ancestor... Carico, is that you?
__________________
"As a scientific discussion grows longer, the probability of the side with an ideological rather than scientific basis for their claim (e.g. Creationists climate change deniers) citing "climate Gate" as an excuse for ignoring the scientific consensus approaches 1." LightHorseman's Law
The problem here is with "...lukewarm conceptually confused theology born out of the desire for some to want to live under the umbrella of Grace but judge everyone else through a Levitical Lens." RealDealNeverStop (as per One11's request) |
Linear Mode
