The Darwin Delusion

Wrong again. Scientists can easily distinguish animal DNA from human DNA. And if humans were carrying animal DNA, then we would be occasionally breeding descendants of that animal.

scientists can also disdinguish pig DNA from dog DNA. Likewise, humans, who (scientifically speaking) are animals, can also be easily disdinguished from other animals.


But this is my last reply to you. You're obviously some sad person purposely trying to make a mockery out Christians.

Personal attacks aren't love. So you need to look at the plank in your own eye so you can see clearly enough to take the speck out of the eyes of others.

I just follow Jesus because he showed the world unequivocally that he has the truth. He's my role model so I follow him. If you love him, I'm sure you would agree that his way is best. if you don't follow him, then of course, you won't listen to those who pass along his words either.

So this thread is about evolution, not character attacks. Please stick to it...unless of course you can't defend evolution. In that case, you've proven my OP and there's nothing more to discuss.

Seeing through your flimsy disguise isn't a character attack... but then you've never been great at using the commonly understood definitions of words, have you Carico?

So you don't believe that humans breed humans and apes breed apes. Is that correct? If so, then I can see why you don't take me seriously.

But in order to discuss the story of evolution, one has to indulge in fantasy since the whole premise of evolution is hypothetical (imaginary),

which is precisely why it's called a theory.

The premise goes like this: "What if humans came from a monkey, no, an ape, no, a half-man, half-beast, no a fictitious animal? How could that happen?"

So in order to discuss how that could happen, one has to indulge in fantasy. And indulging in the imagination rather than describing what happens in reality is called science fiction.

I'm not a science fiction writer so I'll bow out.

I'll simply tell you what animals and humans breed in reality.

So who does the world accept as the common ancestor? Please describe him.. or them.

The world will accept anything scientists tell them, hook, line and sinker without even challenging it.

The only problem is, scientists haven't yet told us who the common ancestor is. So I'd love to hear your story.

Wrong again. Scientists can easily distinguish animal DNA from human DNA. And if humans were carrying animal DNA, then we would be occasionally breeding descendants of that animal.

So sorry friend, but since you don't understand the birds and the bees, then you mix humans with animals and thus have no clue what each one is capable of breeding. But creationists know.

Matthew 23:33, "You snakes! You brood of vipers! How can you escape being condemned to hell?"

So sorry, but Christ's love is not the love that the world who's rules by Satan gives or takes. Jesus doesn't compromise the truth to spare people's feelings. He openly rebukes those who pass along lies. Satan's love gives people what they want. God's love gives us the truth so people will repent and be saved. One's eternal soul is far more important than his earthly pride. So it's not loving to indulge people who pass along false beliefs. But the world doesn't like Christ's love which is of course, why Jesus was killed.

I think this part is interesting in light of the FACT that you keep saying things that are not true about the theory of evolution. Now I'm not talking about simply not believing it, but blatantly saying things about the theory of evolution that you have been shown to be inconsistent with the theory of evolution itself and then claim to actually know about it.
hmm