| Denomination-specific Theology A special subforum where a thread starter can restrict threads to replies by members of a particular denomination only to discuss denomination-specific theology. |
 | | 
6th May 2009, 06:34 PM
| | Without holiness no man shall see the Lord.
  
| | Join Date: 26th March 2009
Posts: 49
Blessings: 69,213
Reps: 3,672,169 (power: 3,675) | | | Divorce + Remarriage = Adultery
I know many years ago most denominations held to some form of the belief that remarriage after divorce was adultery based on Jesus' words in Luke 16:18 and Mark 10:11-12, etc. I am wondering what denominations currently still hold to this standard? I know some Mennonites do, and some Anabaptists, but I was wondering who else still holds to Jesus' standard for marriage? |
6th May 2009, 11:00 PM
| | Veteran
60    
 | | Join Date: 13th May 2008 Location: Davenport, Iowa
Posts: 20,133
Blessings: 79,562,629
Reps: 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 (power: 9,223,372,036,854,800) | | | Interestingly, the Anglican Communion does, at least officially. Despite the extreme waywardness of the Episcopal Church in America, the Anglican Communion does hold this belief. One interesting example was when Prince Charles developed a long-term relationship with his present wife. Following the death of Princess Diana, he married his mistress in a prvate ceremony in the chapel at Windsor Castle conducted by the Archbishop of Canterbury. Prior to the wedding both Charles and his mistress made a complete confession of their sin to the Archbishop. If Diana had remained alive Charles would have been forbidden to marry another wife even if he had divorced Diana. |
28th May 2009, 02:16 AM
|  | Senior Member
39  
| | Join Date: 21st April 2002
Posts: 784
Blessings: 90,512 My Mood 
Reps: 28,989,020 (power: 28,999) | | | The churches of Christ (not a denomination) holds to the view that the only way a person can remarry is if adultry was ivolved in the marriage or if the person mate died. Any other reason would be living in adultry
__________________
2 Timothy 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:17 that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work. |
5th June 2009, 04:20 PM
|  | Woe those who call evil good + good evil. Is 5:20
37  
| | Join Date: 29th July 2007
Posts: 5,825
Blessings: 21,069,507
Reps: 398,724,314,321,260,160 (power: 398,724,314,321,270) | | | Catholics do not believe divorce is even possible in light of Church teaching, and passages like "what God has joined let no man separate," etc. Someone might bring up annulments as the Catholic version of divorce, but that is incorrect. An annulment is a determination that the sacrament of marriage was not actually administered in the first place. |
9th June 2009, 04:48 PM
|  | Problem Child
35    
| | Join Date: 25th April 2005
Posts: 16,437
Blessings: 2,138,702
Reps: 446,706,352,115,660,672 (power: 446,706,352,115,683) | | | I've long disagreed with that distinction, MrPolo.... but I know what you intend on the matter.
__________________
do not question us. Do not challenge us. We are the authority. Accept it, or leave. |
9th June 2009, 06:27 PM
|  | Celtic Rite Old Catholic Church
 
| | Join Date: 20th February 2009
Posts: 4,915
Blessings: 340,176,567 My Mood 
Reps: 187,207,274,281,724,320 (power: 187,207,274,281,731) | | Is it adultery if you became a christian AFTER your first marriage ends in divorce?
(this is not my case, just curious.  )
__________________
In Christ,
Fr. John
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
9th June 2009, 06:39 PM
| | Alexandrian
28 
| | Join Date: 28th April 2009 Location: Boston Ma
Posts: 108
Blessings: 32,498 My Mood 
Reps: 700,357,446,470,780 (power: 700,357,446,473) | | | Coptic Orthodox Church allows divorce only in the case of adultery. Remarriage is granted for the innocent party alone.
Separation is granted in case of abuse.
Annulment is granted is case of fraud only (e.g. one party lying about a chronic disease or something) |
9th June 2009, 06:46 PM
|  | I Love Pigeons
| | Join Date: 4th March 2009
Posts: 5,148
Blessings: 1,098,444 My Mood 
Reps: 120,598,226,738,586,336 (power: 120,598,226,738,594) | | | What I find hypocritical about this subject, even among some Christians, is that if a person had five sexually illegal partners in five previous unmarried relationships, one after the other, and those relationships ended badly and that person eventually met and married someone else, that person would receive lots of praise for their new marriage relationship, even from among Christians.
But if a person was in one sexually legal relationship with one marriage partner and the relationship ended badly and that person eventually met and married someone else, that person would be condemned, even among Christians, as an adulterer for having remarried.
This sounds like hypocrisy to me.
It seems to me that you can fornicate as mush as you like before marriage and then get married happily ever after to someone else, but to have been in a legal marriage relationship that ended badly and to get married to someone else is looked upon as an abomination.
If this is not hypocrisy I don’t know what is.
I think that to have lived in fornication with a number of partners then to have married someone else is far worst than to have lived in a marriage relationship with one partner then to have remarried to someone else.
Maybe the church should not marry anyone who ever fornicated, and not just those who are divorced.
I think that a person who lived in a previous unmarried relationship and eventually married someone else is no different to a person who lived in a previous marriage relationship and eventually remarried to someone else.
__________________
God exists, therefore you are wrong. “Let God be true, and every man a liar.”
__________________
Last edited by Doveaman; 9th June 2009 at 07:14 PM.
|
19th June 2009, 12:58 PM
| | Newbie
| | Join Date: 20th March 2006 Location: the moon
Posts: 68
Blessings: 100,574
Reps: 237,809,998 (power: 237,815) | | Originally Posted by Doveaman  What I find hypocritical about this subject, even among some Christians, is that if a person had five sexually illegal partners in five previous unmarried relationships, one after the other, and those relationships ended badly and that person eventually met and married someone else, that person would receive lots of praise for their new marriage relationship, even from among Christians.
But if a person was in one sexually legal relationship with one marriage partner and the relationship ended badly and that person eventually met and married someone else, that person would be condemned, even among Christians, as an adulterer for having remarried.
This sounds like hypocrisy to me.
It seems to me that you can fornicate as mush as you like before marriage and then get married happily ever after to someone else, but to have been in a legal marriage relationship that ended badly and to get married to someone else is looked upon as an abomination.
If this is not hypocrisy I don’t know what is.
I think that to have lived in fornication with a number of partners then to have married someone else is far worst than to have lived in a marriage relationship with one partner then to have remarried to someone else.
Maybe the church should not marry anyone who ever fornicated, and not just those who are divorced.
I think that a person who lived in a previous unmarried relationship and eventually married someone else is no different to a person who lived in a previous marriage relationship and eventually remarried to someone else.
Fortunately, Truth is not dependent on what you think, it is truth and it does not change.
Not one single Christian understood scripture to be saying what you deem to be true in the first 2/3 of Christianity. Not until Henry the VIII decided he would take the law into his own hands and kill the lawyer for the church and then murder his first and then second wife and remarry, do we see divorce in the church with remarriage following.
One who is validly married in the sight of God and the Church cannot break that covenant with God until death of either the husband or wife. if the marriage was invalid in the sight of God then it was never a marriage to begin with, and the relationship would need to be dissolved.
peace, papist  |
23rd June 2009, 05:21 PM
| | I Love Pigeons
| | Join Date: 4th March 2009
Posts: 5,148
Blessings: 1,098,444 My Mood
Reps: 120,598,226,738,586,336 (power: 120,598,226,738,594) | | Originally Posted by papist1 Fortunately, Truth is not dependent on what you think, it is truth and it does not change.
Not one single Christian understood scripture to be saying what you deem to be true in the first 2/3 of Christianity. Not until Henry the VIII decided he would take the law into his own hands and kill the lawyer for the church and then murder his first and then second wife and remarry, do we see divorce in the church with remarriage following.
One who is validly married in the sight of God and the Church cannot break that covenant with God until death of either the husband or wife. if the marriage was invalid in the sight of God then it was never a marriage to begin with, and the relationship would need to be dissolved.
peace, papist How is a marriage established as valid in the sight of God, is it through the signing of a marriage certificate or is it through the sexual union?
__________________
God exists, therefore you are wrong. “Let God be true, and every man a liar.”
__________________
| | |
| Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
| | |
