Home | Be a Christian | Devotionals | Join Us! | Forums | Rules | F.A.Q.


Go Back   Christian Forums > Congregation > Faith Groups > Bridge Builders - Moderate Christians
Register BlogsPrayersJobsArcade Calendar Mark Forums Read

Bridge Builders - Moderate Christians Congregation forum for moderate Christians.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 30th April 2009, 05:12 PM
dies-l's Avatar
New dad of three kids in the process of adoption.

34 Gender: Male Married Faith: Christian Party: US-Democrat Country: United States Member For 4 Years
 
Join Date: 30th March 2007
Location: Virgo Supercluster
Posts: 6,810
Blessings: 21,037,569
My Mood Praying
Reps: 610,131,166,901,733,632 (power: 610,131,166,901,744)
dies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond repute
dies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond repute
Hate Crimes Bill

This seems to be a pretty emotional issue, especially amng Conservatives. But, it seems that the emotionalism on both sides of issues such as these sometimes creates a distorted picture of what is really going on and makes it difficult to have a meaningful discussion. So, I am wondering what other moderates think of the "hate crimes bill" that passed the House today. Some Conservatives seem to think that it is the death knell of free speech in America. I haven't heard much from Liberals, but I wouldn't be surprised if there are some who hope it will be the death knell of free speech.

Having read it, I don't see anything to be all that concerned about here, but I am interested in what other moderates think of this.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
Become a CF Site Supporter Today and Make These Ads Go Away!

  #2  
Old 4th May 2009, 05:46 PM
Texas Lynn's Avatar
Legend

35 Gender: Female Married Faith: Methodist Party: US-Democrat Country: United States Member For 5 Years Commander
 
Join Date: 17th December 2002
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 11,391
Blessings: 47,266,411
My Mood Yeehaw
Reps: 2,739,276,925,143,152 (power: 0)
Texas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond repute
Texas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond repute
I think the accusation this bill will affect free speech issues at all is prevarication of the most cynically manipulative type.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 4th May 2009, 08:30 PM
dies-l's Avatar
New dad of three kids in the process of adoption.

34 Gender: Male Married Faith: Christian Party: US-Democrat Country: United States Member For 4 Years
 
Join Date: 30th March 2007
Location: Virgo Supercluster
Posts: 6,810
Blessings: 21,037,569
My Mood Praying
Reps: 610,131,166,901,733,632 (power: 610,131,166,901,744)
dies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond repute
dies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond reputedies-l has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by Texas Lynn View Post
I think the accusation this bill will affect free speech issues at all is prevarication of the most cynically manipulative type.
Certainly, I agree with you that it is not a "free speech" issue. I also agree with you that those who treat it as a free speech issue tend to be on the cynical side of life. However, I am yet undecided whether is truly deliberate dihonesty for the purpose of manipulation or whether it is an honest misunderstanding fueled by a cynical worldview.

I suspect that the accusation started out as dishonsty. But, it seems that a fair number of people have come to sincerely believe that their right to express their opinions is at stake.

I am interested to see what other moderate Christians think about this.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 5th May 2009, 12:50 AM
Texas Lynn's Avatar
Legend

35 Gender: Female Married Faith: Methodist Party: US-Democrat Country: United States Member For 5 Years Commander
 
Join Date: 17th December 2002
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 11,391
Blessings: 47,266,411
My Mood Yeehaw
Reps: 2,739,276,925,143,152 (power: 0)
Texas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond repute
Texas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by dies-l View Post
Certainly, I agree with you that it is not a "free speech" issue. I also agree with you that those who treat it as a free speech issue tend to be on the cynical side of life. However, I am yet undecided whether is truly deliberate dihonesty for the purpose of manipulation or whether it is an honest misunderstanding fueled by a cynical worldview.

I suspect that the accusation started out as dishonsty. But, it seems that a fair number of people have come to sincerely believe that their right to express their opinions is at stake.
They've been punk'd.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 5th May 2009, 03:51 AM
Izdaari's Avatar
Charismissional Anglican in an AG church

57 Gender: Female Faith: Anglican Party: US-Libertarian Country: United States Member For 4 Years Fisherman
 
Join Date: 12th March 2007
Posts: 5,116
Blessings: 1,848
My Mood Sleepy
Reps: 30,067,699,875,953,608 (power: 30,067,699,875,963)
Izdaari has a reputation beyond reputeIzdaari has a reputation beyond reputeIzdaari has a reputation beyond reputeIzdaari has a reputation beyond reputeIzdaari has a reputation beyond reputeIzdaari has a reputation beyond reputeIzdaari has a reputation beyond reputeIzdaari has a reputation beyond reputeIzdaari has a reputation beyond reputeIzdaari has a reputation beyond reputeIzdaari has a reputation beyond reputeIzdaari has a reputation beyond reputeIzdaari has a reputation beyond reputeIzdaari has a reputation beyond reputeIzdaari has a reputation beyond repute
Izdaari has a reputation beyond reputeIzdaari has a reputation beyond reputeIzdaari has a reputation beyond reputeIzdaari has a reputation beyond reputeIzdaari has a reputation beyond reputeIzdaari has a reputation beyond reputeIzdaari has a reputation beyond reputeIzdaari has a reputation beyond reputeIzdaari has a reputation beyond reputeIzdaari has a reputation beyond reputeIzdaari has a reputation beyond reputeIzdaari has a reputation beyond reputeIzdaari has a reputation beyond reputeIzdaari has a reputation beyond reputeIzdaari has a reputation beyond repute
I don't see anything in the bill that restricts freedom of speech. It restricts "willfully causing bodily harm", but that's a good thing.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

No guilt of life, no fear of death
This is the power of Christ in me
From life’s first cry to final breath
Jesus commands my destiny
No power of hell, no scheme of man
Can ever pluck me from His hand
‘Til He returns or calls me home
Here in the power of Christ I’ll stand
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 5th May 2009, 11:35 AM
Texas Lynn's Avatar
Legend

35 Gender: Female Married Faith: Methodist Party: US-Democrat Country: United States Member For 5 Years Commander
 
Join Date: 17th December 2002
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 11,391
Blessings: 47,266,411
My Mood Yeehaw
Reps: 2,739,276,925,143,152 (power: 0)
Texas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond repute
Texas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond reputeTexas Lynn has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by Izdaari View Post
I don't see anything in the bill that restricts freedom of speech. It restricts "willfully causing bodily harm", but that's a good thing.
That seems to be a reasoned analysis. But the "sky is falling" people are not responding to rational things.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 5th May 2009, 03:11 PM
AzA's Avatar
NF | NT

Gender: Female Member For 3 Years
 
Join Date: 4th August 2008
Posts: 1,544
Blessings: 52,255
Reps: 9,593,029,481,657,596 (power: 9,593,029,481,662)
AzA has disabled reputation
HR 1913 (now S 909) does not criminalize speech, thought, or private doctrine. It doesn't even criminalize violent crimes of bias because those have been well-defined and criminal in this country since the 1960s.

What it does do is allow federal law enforcement agencies to support state prosecution of these crimes with resources and funding. It adds another four protected classes to the original four. It limits the maximum possible sentencing for these crimes such that the death penalty is not in play. And it loosens some restrictions on when a crime can be called a hate crime and treated as such.

That is all.

I don't mind if people object to these things because they are antifederalist, or because they don't like the idea of certain groups of people being singled out under any circumstances -- though when you find me someone who is consistent about that, let me know.

I do mind people misreading the law and teaching others to misread it. There are significant responsibilities associated with teaching and that is why not everyone should do it.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 5th May 2009, 04:32 PM
Regular Member

Gender: Male Faith: Presbyterian Party: US-Democrat Country: United States Member For 3 Years
View Profile Pic
 
Join Date: 14th November 2008
Posts: 346
Blessings: 81,606
My Mood Fine
Reps: 20,635,570 (power: 20,639)
ChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond repute
ChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by dies-l View Post
This seems to be a pretty emotional issue, especially amng Conservatives. But, it seems that the emotionalism on both sides of issues such as these sometimes creates a distorted picture of what is really going on and makes it difficult to have a meaningful discussion. So, I am wondering what other moderates think of the "hate crimes bill" that passed the House today. Some Conservatives seem to think that it is the death knell of free speech in America. I haven't heard much from Liberals, but I wouldn't be surprised if there are some who hope it will be the death knell of free speech.

Having read it, I don't see anything to be all that concerned about here, but I am interested in what other moderates think of this.
It's definitely not the "death knell" of free speech, but I understand the concerns of some conservatives that it could lead to legislation that punishes "hate speech." Regarding the specific issue of whether it is fair and beneficial to punish the same act of violence more severely if it is motivated by hatred for a particular group, on one hand, I don't think that the lives and well-being of minority groups are "worth more" than that of non-minorities (which is what some opponents of hate crime bills suggest the bill stands for). I do think that the motivation for a crime can be a factor in determining sentences. For example, second degree "in the heat of passion" murder has a lower sentence than first degree "premeditated" muder. Also, if an offender is motivated by hatred towards an entire group as opposed to a single individual, then that offender is more likely to become a recidivist because there are so many more victims to target and those victims need not do anything to provoke the offender--what the offender finds offensive is something inherent to the victim's group.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 5th May 2009, 04:37 PM
Regular Member

Gender: Male Faith: Presbyterian Party: US-Democrat Country: United States Member For 3 Years
View Profile Pic
 
Join Date: 14th November 2008
Posts: 346
Blessings: 81,606
My Mood Fine
Reps: 20,635,570 (power: 20,639)
ChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond repute
ChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond reputeChristianCritic has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by dies-l View Post
This seems to be a pretty emotional issue, especially amng Conservatives. But, it seems that the emotionalism on both sides of issues such as these sometimes creates a distorted picture of what is really going on and makes it difficult to have a meaningful discussion. So, I am wondering what other moderates think of the "hate crimes bill" that passed the House today. Some Conservatives seem to think that it is the death knell of free speech in America. I haven't heard much from Liberals, but I wouldn't be surprised if there are some who hope it will be the death knell of free speech.

Having read it, I don't see anything to be all that concerned about here, but I am interested in what other moderates think of this.
I do want to say for the record that while I have no problem with hate crime bills, I do oppose criminalizing hate speech or penalizing people for being politically incorrect. I do believe that freedom of speech is ultimately beneficial for everyone, and that even a racist has a greater chance of changing his viewpoints if he has a chance to air them out and discuss them with others. I highly recommend reading "On Liberty" by John Stuart Mill--there is a section in that treatise on Freedom of Speech and Discussion.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 28th July 2009, 01:42 AM
Senior Veteran

Member For 5 Years
View Profile Pic
 
Join Date: 5th June 2005
Posts: 2,189
Blessings: 1,000,093,541
My Mood Pensive
Reps: 5,825,286,539,019 (power: 0)
spinningtutu has a reputation beyond reputespinningtutu has a reputation beyond reputespinningtutu has a reputation beyond reputespinningtutu has a reputation beyond reputespinningtutu has a reputation beyond reputespinningtutu has a reputation beyond reputespinningtutu has a reputation beyond reputespinningtutu has a reputation beyond reputespinningtutu has a reputation beyond reputespinningtutu has a reputation beyond reputespinningtutu has a reputation beyond reputespinningtutu has a reputation beyond reputespinningtutu has a reputation beyond reputespinningtutu has a reputation beyond reputespinningtutu has a reputation beyond repute
spinningtutu has a reputation beyond reputespinningtutu has a reputation beyond reputespinningtutu has a reputation beyond reputespinningtutu has a reputation beyond reputespinningtutu has a reputation beyond reputespinningtutu has a reputation beyond reputespinningtutu has a reputation beyond reputespinningtutu has a reputation beyond reputespinningtutu has a reputation beyond reputespinningtutu has a reputation beyond reputespinningtutu has a reputation beyond reputespinningtutu has a reputation beyond reputespinningtutu has a reputation beyond reputespinningtutu has a reputation beyond reputespinningtutu has a reputation beyond repute
I think the bill was long overdue :-)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Return to Bridge Builders - Moderate Christians

Thread Tools
Display Modes


 
Become a CF Site Supporter Today and Make These Ads Go Away!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:45 AM.