Origins TheologyForum for the discussion of Creation Science (Young/Old) vs Theistic Evolution. Discussion of Atheistic Evolution should be taken to the Discussion and Debate forums.
Instead of holding fast to any knowledge or facts derived from reason and experience, we should hold fast to the Word of God. Man's theories are constantly evolving to adapt to the latest 'scientific' finding, yet the Word of God never changes. Bottom line, don't let your interpretation of Scripture be swayed by any man derived theory.
Truth cannot contradict truth. If reality and Scripture seem to conflict, it is because we have misunderstood one or both of them. And it is equally possible to be mistaken about reality or Scripture.
It's very important to remember that what our personal take on Scripture is not necessarily the Word of God.
as an evangelical, the most annoying thing someone could say to you is darwin.
hmm, ok, I don't know where my quote went the first time, so here it is again.
I guess I'm going to blow your mind away! Will I annoy myself?
I AM an evangelical AND an evolutionist!
Don't assume that everyone is the same just because we are Christians
__________________ God is bigger than your theology!
"Some people believe Adam and Eve rode dinosaurs to church."--TL funniest post ever.
"God is not a liar, but he is a poet."--CL--best sig ever
Actually cross bearer could be right.
The bacterial flagellum might be hard to explain by natural selection, which leaves design.
Which would pretty much refute Darwinism.
"If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down. But I can find out no such case."
- Charles Darwin
And this seems to be the case with the bacterial flagellum.
I am not allowed to post links yet, due to postcount, but search "Free Global Energy P-10" on youtube.
Actually cross bearer could be right.
The bacterial flagellum might be hard to explain by natural selection, which leaves design.
Which would pretty much refute Darwinism.
"If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down. But I can find out no such case."
- Charles Darwin
And this seems to be the case with the bacterial flagellum.
I am not allowed to post links yet, due to postcount, but search "Free Global Energy P-10" on youtube.
Come on man.
I can't post links either, but a quick google search shows hundreds of links that show how the evolution of the bacterial flagellum is possible.
This is a tired old PRATT that has almost literally been Refuted AThousand Times.
Linear Mode
