Impeach Obama Now!

Archaeopteryx · #71 20th March 2009, 06:01 AM

Obama Acting Like Hitler

Obama wants to make sure his side of the issues gets to the American People, just like Hitler wanted to spread his propaganda.

I don't mind free speech, but are the networks going to offer an opposing view by someone like Rush Limbaugh?

Democrats have a great Charismatic advantage in verbal presentations, but that does not mean the policies are good.

There are some very serious issues that need both sides of the issue presented.

I do not like the Socialistic/Atheistic/Environmentalistic direction that Obama is leading.

America will not be able to make a good choice if both sides are not presented.

You are not in favour of presenting both sides to an issue. Remember, you advocated censorship in the past by governmental authorization. Seems rather hypocritical to demand full disclosure now that you want both sides presented.

clirus · #72 20th March 2009, 09:09 AM

bjspurple quote

You are not in favour of presenting both sides to an issue. Remember, you advocated censorship in the past by governmental authorization. Seems rather hypocritical to demand full disclosure now that you want both sides presented.

Response

I will admit that I present the Christian view of issues if you admit the Atheistic Liberal News and Entertainment Industry presents the Atheistic view of issues.

Now, who should repent and change first?

Now, which is better, the Christian Lifestyle or the Atheistic Lifestyle?

Does the Atheistic Liberal News and Entertainment Industry show the STDs and AIDS that follow heterosexual and homosexual activity?

Matthew 3:7 states, "But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees come to his baptism, he said unto them, O generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?"

I believe Christians have a responsibility to use the Bible relative to all issues.

II Timothy 3:16 states, "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness".

Nathan Poe · #73 20th March 2009, 06:29 PM

Originally Posted by clirus

bjspurple quote

You are not in favour of presenting both sides to an issue. Remember, you advocated censorship in the past by governmental authorization. Seems rather hypocritical to demand full disclosure now that you want both sides presented.

Response

I will admit that I present the Christian view of issues if you admit the Atheistic Liberal News and Entertainment Industry presents the Atheistic view of issues.

Then how is it that there are some Atheists who disagree with the "Atheistic view," and many Christians who disagree with your view?

Now, who should repent and change first?

I do recall someone talking about taking the beam out of your own eye first -- He wasn't talking to the Atheists at the time.

Now, which is better, the Christian Lifestyle or the Atheistic Lifestyle?

Atheistic -- hands down. Why else would you be so bitter?

Does the Atheistic Liberal News and Entertainment Industry show the STDs and AIDS that follow heterosexual and homosexual activity?

Yes.

Matthew 3:7 states, "But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees come to his baptism, he said unto them, O generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?"

And which one are you, clirus -- Jesus, or one of the vipers?

Incidentally, clirus -- are you going to answer the question? How can you complain about "presenting both sides" out one side of your mouth and advocate government censorship out the other?

7thKeeper · #74 24th March 2009, 10:08 AM

Originally Posted by faith guardian

Are we not to be stewards of this planet Clirus? If we take care of our children and our wives, does that mean we are worshipping them instead of God? NO! It means we are doing as He commanded, and love them freely and fully.
As for the earth, if we love and worship God, would we not take care of that which He has created? Isn't destroying His creation akin to spitting Him in the face?

This all reminds me of a piece of a song called Hyvä Ihminen (Good Human/Person). Though I'm starting to see and hear less of Clirus' opinion myself and more calls for good stewardship for our planet from religious circles.

[Pre-chorus]
Hänen lailla me harhailemme
eksyneinä ja tiedä emme
minne katosi toiveet ylväät
kun vain onnettomuutta kylvää

[Chorus: 2x]
Suuressa armossaan Luoja teki meille maan
Poltettavakseen ja tuhottavakseen sai sen
Hyvä ihminen

Translation would be:

Like him we wander
lost and don't know
where all the noble wishes disappeared
when we only sow misfortune

In His great mercy the Lord created for us the Earth
To burn and to destroy it was given to
A good human

clirus · #75 24th March 2009, 10:38 AM

Obama Deficits

The impact of the following is probably not going to be recognized by democrats that are trying to implement Socialism and Atheism.

America has been funding the deficits through securities sold to foreign countries.

If the deficits, and particularly all the new Obama deficits, cannot be sold to foreign countries, there are only two options - HIGHER TAXES ON AMERICANS - INFLATION.

Simply stated, foreign countries do not trust democrats.

It will not be long before Americans realize democrats promise everything but deliver nothing.

It is kind of ironic that the new Obama toxic (sub prime) mortgage program is a capitalists (private investor) dream and a socialists nightmare. Capitalists get a 85% leverage and foreclosures will skyrocket when capitalists start removing people from the property they have purchased and expect to see a profit from. The whole thing could fail because a 85% leverage is not adequate pay for capitalists to do the dirty work the democrats are unwilling to do.

Obama just stabbed the sup prime mortgage holders in the back. There could be rioting when the evictions start.

-----------------------------------

China calls for new reserve currency

By Jamil Anderlini in Beijing

Published: March 23 2009 12:16 | Last updated: March 24 2009 00:06

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7851925a-1...0779fd2ac.html

China's central bank on Monday proposed replacing the US dollar as the international reserve currency with a new global system controlled by the International Monetary Fund.

In an essay posted on the People's Bank of China's website, Zhou Xiaochuan, the central bank's governor, said the goal would be to create a reserve currency "that is disconnected from individual nations and is able to remain stable in the long run, thus removing the inherent deficiencies caused by using credit-based national currencies".

Analysts said the proposal was an indication of Beijing's fears that actions being taken to save the domestic US economy would have a negative impact on China.

"This is a clear sign that China, as the largest holder of US dollar financial assets, is concerned about the potential inflationary risk of the US Federal Reserve printing money," said Qu Hongbin, chief China economist for HSBC.

Although Mr Zhou did not mention the US dollar, the essay gave a pointed critique of the current dollar-dominated monetary system.

"The outbreak of the [current] crisis and its spillover to the entire world reflected the inherent vulnerabilities and systemic risks in the existing international monetary system," Mr Zhou wrote.

China has little choice but to hold the bulk of its $2,000bn of foreign exchange reserves in US dollars, and this is unlikely to change in the near future.

clirus · #76 24th March 2009, 10:53 AM

7thKeeper quote

This all reminds me of a piece of a song called Hyvä Ihminen (Good Human/Person). Though I'm starting to see and hear less of Clirus' opinion myself and more calls for good stewardship for our planet from religious circles.

Response

I see no problem with Christians being a good steward of the earth as God commands, but I believe Atheists are perverting the commands of God for good stewardship to a worship of nature.

There are people in religious circles that are getting into the extreme environmentalist movement because they see it as a popular cause, but they had better be concerned they are supporting an Atheistic cause.

If you examine past extreme environmentalist activities, you will find many examples where the decision favored nature over humans. Please don't ask me to prove that, I just do not have the time.

I believe Satan provides all kinds of distractions to Christians to prevent Christians from doing what God commands.

Matthew 28:19-20 states, "Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and the Holy Ghost: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world."

Do you really believe the Al Gore global warming thing, or is it just a way for Atheists to control and tax people?

I don't even throw gum wrappers out the window of my small car, but then, I don't accept either global warming or evolution.

Nathan Poe · #77 24th March 2009, 04:16 PM

Unless someone's been messing with the laws of cause-and-effect, wouldn't Obama have to commit an impeachable offense before he could be impeached?

"There's the King's Messenger. He's in prison now, being punished: and the trial doesn't even begin till next Wednesday: and of course the crime comes last of all." -- Alice Through the Looking Glass

Just curious....

tulc · #78 24th March 2009, 05:40 PM

If you examine past extreme environmentalist activities, you will find many examples where the decision favored nature over humans. Please don't ask me to prove that, I just do not have the time.

hmmm so you have time to make the charge but not to prove the charge?

I don't even throw gum wrappers out the window of my small car, but then, I don't accept either global warming or evolution.

tulc(uhmmm...ok)

clirus · #79 18th April 2009, 09:52 AM

Obama and Democrats are Hypocrites

Which is worse, waterboarding that simulates death to get information that could save lives, or execution by blowing the heads off pirates to rescue a kidnaped person.

Obama said "America does not torture", but what he did was "America does not torture, we blow their heads off". The liberal democrats and Atheistic Liberal News Media are sweeping Obama's hypocrisy under the rug. Conservatives and Republicans agree with executing the pirates, but are not hypocrites about it.

Pacifist democrats do great harm by being hypocrites. They criticized Bush and the Republicans, but do nothing about Obama and the democrats. Cindy Shehan was the darling of the pacifist democrats till she started criticizing the democrats for funding the Iraq War, then she was treated like dirt by the pacifist democrats and Atheistic Liberal News Media.

Environmentalist democrats do great harm by being hypocrites. Democrats advocate things that people reject. Even Ted Kennedy opposed wind mills. Democrats advocate train service, but people do not use train service. Democrats think they can force people to do things, but people reject the things and the force. Democrats use government money (TARP, etc.) to force mortgage changes, salary limits, educational curriculum, etc.

Socialist democrats do great harm by being hypocrites. Socialism/Communism has failed everywhere it has been attempted. The only places where socialism exist are where there are price controls and reduced expectation that keep the people in poverty.

Obama promised "no earmarks", but then hid in a back room and signed an appropriation bill that had 9000 earmarks.

America needs to get rid of Obama, the democrats and the Atheistic Liberal News Media that is the propaganda organization for Obama and the democrats.

Archaeopteryx · #80 18th April 2009, 10:16 AM

I will admit that I present the Christian view of issues if you admit the Atheistic Liberal News and Entertainment Industry presents the Atheistic view of issues.

I will admit that you present the Christian view of issues the day that you start presenting a Christian view of issues.

Does the Atheistic Liberal News and Entertainment Industry show the STDs and AIDS that follow heterosexual and homosexual activity?

Ummm... yes actually. In fact, that's how many people are aware that unprotected sex leads to HIV... through the Atheistic Liberal News and Entertainment Industry.