"Embedded Age" and Why it's Wrong

As i mentioned before, this is pretty funny coming from someone whose ancestors were
chucking spears at wooly mammoths while mine were sipping tea and writing poetry.

As i mentioned before, this is pretty funny coming from someone whose ancestors were
chucking spears at wooly mammoths while mine were sipping tea and writing poetry.

I can see how it is with you guys.

I recently asked my wife if she had any problems whatsoever with Embedded Age, and she said, "none".

As I have said before, the only ones who seem to have problems with this, is you guys.

I have a whole church full of people who either nod, or say, "Amen", when the pastor preaches this stuff.

I can't help it if you guys don't understand --- especially when you make jokes, etc. between explanations, call God a liar and a deceiver, and throw ad hominems my way.

And yet I've clearly said that Embedded Age is maturity without history. I wouldn't have to specify "without" if this wasn't a special case, but it is a one-time, one-week, act of omnipotence that not even the angels can repeat.Here it is --- please note yet again my exclusion of the passage of time:

• maturity without history

Maybe God embedded an extra few millenia of human history as well.

6000 year old Chinese writing- embedded age. 3.7 million year footprints- embedded age. Any human history older than 6,000 years, it was embedded.

We've found many human fossils (of actual Homo sapiens) that are much older than 6,000 years. I presume God embedded the age in these bones as well, huh AV?

:-( My ancestors were planting corn and developing decent ecological processes until another people's ancestors gave them small pox. :-(

We do understand. You fail to understand the implications of such theology. If God created the appearance of something that never happened, that is a lie. Most people who would believe such a thing would never really stop and think about the deeper implications of "embedded age" theology.

BananaSlug, I can assure you that I'm using all the patience I can muster to keep from threading-out. I am so tired of telling you over and over, between you guys' jokes and ad hominems, the difference between embedded age and embedded history.

I don't "fail to understand" a thing --- believe me --- you are the one who fails to understand.

You baited me here with a discussion I thought was going to be on the Creation Week, and you want to discuss fossils, the Chinese, and everything but Creation.

Well one of our posters assures us that the native americans were evil and that the conquistodores etc were just doing gods will and judgement. They is christianized now, and it wuz the best thing ever hapened to 'em. so dont take it hard. It helped a lot. i heard about that.

AV, I attempted to understand your proposition, but when I tried to rephrase it to you, you responded with lunch meat. I did not make a joke about your beliefs, and I did not provide an ad hominem, but I received inanity back telling me neither if I had your belief right or wrong, or why. By saying you were telling us the difference, when my experience in this thread has been you have had no such interest in doing so is ridiculous.