Origins TheologyForum for the discussion of Creation Science (Young/Old) vs Theistic Evolution. Discussion of Atheistic Evolution should be taken to the Discussion and Debate forums.
Despite his many detractors in the US from non- bible believing Christians, I think Kent Hovind is the best advocate for Young-Earth Creationism. You can watch has videos on You-tube or Google Video. Kent Hovind tells the truth about the universe, and he makes those snide haughty evolutionists quirm in their plastic seats..
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Despite his many detractors in the US from non- bible believing Christians, I think Kent Hovind is the best advocate for Young-Earth Creationism. You can watch has videos on You-tube or Google Video. Kent Hovind tells the truth about the universe, and he makes those snide haughty evolutionists quirm in their plastic seats..
Please, please, tell me you're joking. There are some groups that make legitimate attempts to defend creationism - groups like the Discovery Institute, AIG (the internet group, not the bank), and other apologetics sites/institutes. Hovind not only shows misunderstandings of basic scientific ideas, but he makes arguments that those (semi)-legitimate groups reject as wrong and the use of which harms the arguments of creationists everywhere.
Honestly, people like Hovind, Ken Ham, and (on youtube) VenomfangX give creationists a bad name and make it far, far, too easy to lampoon/mock.
Just watch this and then tell, honestly, whether you are still interested in his stuff. I admit, i saw his stuff when i was in school, 11ish years ago and i ate it up. Now i'm embarrassed that i bought into his "arguments".
Just watch this and then tell, honestly, whether you are still interested in his stuff. I admit, i saw his stuff when i was in school, 11ish years ago and i ate it up. Now i'm embarrassed that i bought into his "arguments".
Everyone accuses Hovind of taking things out of context, then videos like this do the same thing to him and spin their own interpretation on science. If the guys arguments are so wrong and false, why does he have so much influence and win so many debates?
There is a debate between him and Hugh Ross, respected Old Earth creationist, and Hovind mops the floor with him.
I'm glad to see everyone here takes the word of homemade youtube doctumentaries over real science.
__________________ Richard Dawkins thinks aliens made us... and yet we're the ones who are 'out there'
John 1:5 "5The light shines in the darkness, but the darkness has not understood it."
Honestly, people like Hovind, Ken Ham, and (on youtube) VenomfangX give creationists a bad name and make it far, far, too easy to lampoon/mock.
Looks like his parents agreed with you, VenomFangX has been yanked off the net.
__________________ Funny thing about tracking.
Most would fear seeing this -> To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
than seeing this -> To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Isaiah 8:12-13 (NIV) "Do not call conspiracy everything that these people call conspiracy; do not fear what they fear, and do not dread it. The Lord Almighty is the one you are to regard as holy, he is the one you are to fear, he is the one you are to dread."
Linear Mode
