Creation & EvolutionForum for the discussion of this important topic. This forum is open to non-believers. There is a Christians-only forum in the Christians-only section too.
It looks like Nature, the most prestigious scientific journal, has decided to weigh in on the Creation vs. Evolution controversy with an essay citing 15 examples published in the last decade to illustrate evolution. Here it is: http://www.nature.com/nature/newspdf/evolutiongems.pdf
__________________ “It took me years, but letting go of religion has been the most profound wake up of my life. I feel I now look at the world not as a child, but as an adult. I see what's bad and it's really bad. But I also see what is beautiful, what is wonderful. And I feel so deeply appreciative that I am alive. How dare the religious use the term 'born again.' That truly describes freethinkers who've thrown off the shackles of religion so much better!” - Julia Sweeney
"Yet there is good evidence that
mammals originally evolved on land. If that is so, then the ancestors of whales must have taken to the water at some point."
See? See?!? "IF" that is so! Those scientifical guys dont know, they just say IF all the time.
Pshaw.
"It used to be thought that the first landlubbers
were stranded fish that evolved to spend more and more time
ashore, returning to water to reproduce. Over the past 20 years, palaeontologists have uncovered fossils that
have turned this idea upside down"
See? See?!? Those scientifical guys are always changing their opinions.
One word-
Pluto
Can't trust 'em I tell ya.
"The discovery of feathered dinosaurs not only vindicated the idea of transitional forms, but also showed
that evolution has a way of coming up with a dazzling variety of solutions when we had no idea that there
were even problems."
But they're still DINOSAURS!! Not Birds!!! PWNED!
Shall I keep on going?
Embarrass you scientifical types even more?
MWWAHAHAHA
Seriously, though, cool .pdf, I'll be reading it with interest
Thanks
__________________
"I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use." Galileo Galilei
"Telling me the ToE is wrong is like telling a car mechanic
the internal combustion engine runs on magic."- Blayz
The POINT of Creationism, from an honest Creationist
"And yes, to prove evolution is wrong does not mean creation is right. But, the goal is just that, to prove evolution is wrong. Nothing else."
-juvenissun
sigh that reminds me of a person i run across all the time that always attacks it cause they always qualify what they write. And then they say therefore god is the best answer.
__________________ I'm a polyatheists. There are many gods I dont believe in.
sigh that reminds me of a person i run across all the time that always attacks it cause they always qualify what they write. And then they say therefore god is the best answer.
I guess the illusion of certainty is better than being honest to some people.
__________________ “It took me years, but letting go of religion has been the most profound wake up of my life. I feel I now look at the world not as a child, but as an adult. I see what's bad and it's really bad. But I also see what is beautiful, what is wonderful. And I feel so deeply appreciative that I am alive. How dare the religious use the term 'born again.' That truly describes freethinkers who've thrown off the shackles of religion so much better!” - Julia Sweeney
This stuff is terrible. Studies about nothing. Clams and snakes have poison. Well duh.
This creationist insists also that whales were landlubbers first and only adapted to the sea after the flood.
In fact i once had a letter to the editor published in Nature on this. With Prothero answering.
Its good to see them frightened by the rising successful criticism that is becoming famous and intrusive in all the Anglo-American world.
These 15 are good evidence of the poverty of a idea to explain glorious complexity in biology.
This stuff is terrible. Studies about nothing. Clams and snakes have poison. Well duh.
This creationist insists also that whales were landlubbers first and only adapted to the sea after the flood.
In fact i once had a letter to the editor published in Nature on this. With Prothero answering.
Its good to see them frightened by the rising successful criticism that is becoming famous and intrusive in all the Anglo-American world.
These 15 are good evidence of the poverty of a idea to explain glorious complexity in biology.
This stuff is terrible. Studies about nothing. Clams and snakes have poison. Well duh.
I already suspected that you were deficient in your reading capabilities. Thank you for demonstrating this so nicely here.
This creationist insists also that whales were landlubbers first and only adapted to the sea after the flood.
In fact i once had a letter to the editor published in Nature on this. With Prothero answering.
Link?
Its good to see them frightened by the rising successful criticism that is becoming famous and intrusive in all the Anglo-American world.
These 15 are good evidence of the poverty of a idea to explain glorious complexity in biology.
Not only reading deficient, but also delusional.
__________________
Tom
'What luck for rulers, that men do not think.'
-Ascribed to Adolf Hitler-
`Contrariwise,' continued Tweedledee, `if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic.'
-Through the Looking Glas by Lewis Caroll-
Statistics are like a bikini. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital.
This stuff is terrible. Studies about nothing. Clams and snakes have poison. Well duh.
This creationist insists also that whales were landlubbers first and only adapted to the sea after the flood.
In fact i once had a letter to the editor published in Nature on this. With Prothero answering.
Its good to see them frightened by the rising successful criticism that is becoming famous and intrusive in all the Anglo-American world.
These 15 are good evidence of the poverty of a idea to explain glorious complexity in biology.
ok, so you can generalize, and say "well duh". You can make things up like that "they" are "frightened".
What you cant do is find one single item in evolutionary theory or geological dating that can be falsified. Isnt that odd. Something so monstrously false should be such a target-rich environment. Why cant you find even one? Want a hint?
What you cant do is find one single item in evolutionary theory or geological dating that can be falsified.
Well, to be pedantic, I think you meant has been, not can be. Of course, many things in evolution can be potentially falsified. That's part of what makes it a good theory. The other part is that these things have been tested over and over and over again and the theory has failed to be falsified each time.
__________________ “It took me years, but letting go of religion has been the most profound wake up of my life. I feel I now look at the world not as a child, but as an adult. I see what's bad and it's really bad. But I also see what is beautiful, what is wonderful. And I feel so deeply appreciative that I am alive. How dare the religious use the term 'born again.' That truly describes freethinkers who've thrown off the shackles of religion so much better!” - Julia Sweeney
This stuff is terrible. Studies about nothing. Clams and snakes have poison. Well duh.
This creationist insists also that whales were landlubbers first and only adapted to the sea after the flood.
In fact i once had a letter to the editor published in Nature on this. With Prothero answering.
Its good to see them frightened by the rising successful criticism that is becoming famous and intrusive in all the Anglo-American world.
These 15 are good evidence of the poverty of a idea to explain glorious complexity in biology.
Care to point out a particular one of the 15 examples you find particularly poor and why?
__________________ “It took me years, but letting go of religion has been the most profound wake up of my life. I feel I now look at the world not as a child, but as an adult. I see what's bad and it's really bad. But I also see what is beautiful, what is wonderful. And I feel so deeply appreciative that I am alive. How dare the religious use the term 'born again.' That truly describes freethinkers who've thrown off the shackles of religion so much better!” - Julia Sweeney
Linear Mode
