Originally Posted by cesty  I favor the following interpretation for Col. 2:16-17 - Asceticism
That fits with the evidence I have seen. See my study "An In-Depth Look at the Significant Words and Grammatical Structure of Colossians 2:16-17" at A Study on Col. 2:16-17
__________________
Because the critics have not studied any subject in any sort of depth (at least 3,000 pages), they quite literally do not know how little they know. In fact, they don't even know that they don't know.
---
When they are wrong on the simple, why should you listen to them on the more complex?
---
One rule you can always count on: never, ever trust the critics on anything. They've proven that they cannot, and will not, tell you the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
---
I now have 99 authors in my plagiarism study. The critics still have zero. | 
Linear Mode
