Atheist ethics, atheist values

[/color]
No, studied as in read into it. You don’t have to be a scientist to read up on concepts. I’m going to take it that you haven’t, seeing as you seem to have this 17th century deterministic clockwork universe in your head. Go read up on QM, it’s fascinating. Especially entanglement, the uncertainly principle and virtual particles. You’ll like virtual particles – something from nothing, an uncaused event.

Not to put a downer on the many great Christian scientists, but the church and Christianity as an entity don’t have a great track record.

OK so how does a car "stays" working?

Interesting that the further we go the more things don't look chaotic. You pan backwards and see it all unfold. Nope, we Christians are really into new science. It's not proving a choas to order thing. Order to order from order. Cyclical.

That's pitful logic. Where did time come from. That IS logic. If the clock is winding down, then it must have had a start. And if you mean breaking down is in evidence, even your great atheist apolgists are stuttering in debate after debate with Christian apologists to defend a cosmos from chaos. Of course their's always space aliens.

The big bad scientist bogey-man is just not frightening anymore. He's now are bestest buddy. BFF. Literally.



The cyclical system is the very essence of Biblical reality.

How did John know? Trapped on that Island and having a dream about "God" restarting the hole of creation?

Man this is exciting times in which we Christians live. Watching scientists prove our positions right.



Wait, wait, I mean:




P.S. Oh, would you like the reference to the cycle in Revelations?

Order. Designed order.

It's a cyclical thing.

Originally Posted by Psudopod

[/color]No, studied as in read into it. You don’t have to be a scientist to read up on concepts. I’m going to take it that you haven’t, seeing as you seem to have this 17th century deterministic clockwork universe in your head. Go read up on QM, it’s fascinating. Especially entanglement, the uncertainly principle and virtual particles. You’ll like virtual particles – something from nothing, an uncaused event.
Interesting that the further we go the more things don't look chaotic. You pan backwards and see it all unfold. Nope, we Christians are really into new science. It's not proving a choas to order thing. Order to order from order. Cyclical.

There’s still the creationists though.
Using science.

Speak for yourself; many Christians here disagree with you.

It is obvious you have no idea about anything scientific let alone Quantum physics.

On style maybe but not substance.




LOL. Schoolyard comebacks just don't cut it. And certainly do not support your opinion.

Lol, yeah, I haven't heard someone query my backing in quantum physics since grade school. Next he'll be all like, "I'm rubber and your glue so your position is untenable based on all accepted theories of macroeconomics and your proposed regulation would fail by any metric."

why, what kind of grade school did the rest of you go to?

The atheist's position comes down to taunts and puffy positioning of science that can no more support atheism than it does support the Easter Bunny.

Physics.

The universe is not random chaos. It is observable and provable through mathematics.

You haven't studied quantum mechanics, have you? The universe is not nearly as deterministic as we first thought.

Study as in being a scientist in the field? Don't get goofy.

I don't have to be a car mechanic to understand how a car stays working.

No, studied as in read into it. You don’t have to be a scientist to read up on concepts. I’m going to take it that you haven’t, seeing as you seem to have this 17th century deterministic clockwork universe in your head. Go read up on QM, it’s fascinating.

Interesting that the further we go the more things don't look chaotic. You pan backwards and see it all unfold.

It is obvious you have no idea about anything scientific let alone Quantum physics.

LOL. Schoolyard comebacks just don't cut it. And certainly do not support your opinion.

here's the thing, when we look at the chain of the conversation, it was based off a demonstrably wrong statement you made:









You assumed, and apparently still assume a clockwork universe. That is false. You were called on it and you brushed off legitimate criticism as schoolyard taunts.