The question Evolutionsists can't answer

funyun likes to laugh and talk about straw. Perhaps the farm would be a better venue for him rather one that expects good solid answers.

Song 7:10-13
I am my beloved's, and his desire is toward me. [11] Come, my beloved, let us go forth into the field; let us lodge in the villages. [12] Let us get up early to the vineyards; let us see if the vine flourish, whether the tender grape appear, and the pomegranates bud forth: there will I give thee my loves. [13] The mandrakes give a smell, and at our gates are all manner of pleasant fruits, new and old, which I have laid up for thee, O my beloved.

Desire comes first.

John...you provided us with evidence by quoting a steamy love poem about sex?

So far there has been no answer. And neither can there be.

Like all false beliefs, from the legalism-grace hybrid of the Seventh Day Adventists, through to the "date-the-rocks-by-the-fossils, and date-the-fossils-by-the-rocks" evolutionists, the idea that orgasm can evolve is inherently circular: it is not possible for anything dependant upon itself, to evolve. This is a philosophical impasse.

JohnR7 tells us that "desire came first".

Explain how a desire for that which has never existed, can evolve.

And take two asprins while you're at it.

Lol

The Lord bless you Intrepid.

I dont see how that poem explains how desire came first.

God bless you too Colossians.

We have watched the evolutionist camp run round and round.. as predicted.

Now let's watch how hard their hearts become when they lose the fight on their supposed preferred turf: logic. Let's see whether it is really logic that they hold to, or whether it might be something more spiritually oriented, deep within.