The question Evolutionsists can't answer

What category is my prize in?

Ridiculousness?
Unpronounceability?

It's not easy to explain Czech that way...There's a few online dictionaries with soundbites of each word you can find.

It's a real bummer of a language to learn, too...kind of like Georgian. People are known to commit suicide after a really good Georgian class.

We have seen alot of bluff here. But no answers from the evolutionist camp which address the philosophical impasse.

And we have seen bluff of the kind designed to suck in naive moderators to rule against things like "trolling". (Always assign a label to the opposition's style which is ostensibly in the name of diplomacy - makes you at least look noble when you lack brilliance. If you can't beat them then by your argument, at least you can disqualify them by the rules!)

Here is a typical example of the sort of cart-before-horse thinking we get from their camp, which sums up just nicely the redundancy of their position:

Pleasure is a good incentive to reproduce. If you don't enjoy reproducing, you are less likely to be willing to invest the time and energy to reproduce
Synopsis:
I perceive a need to reproduce (of course I myself am a reproduction, but that doesn't matter here.. I'm don't notice circularity when I am presenting it), and so I have a great incentive to reproduce (afterall, if I dont reproduce, my grand children won't be able to talk about me in years to come.)

But although I have this great incentive, it is not great enough: I need to 'evolve' a pleasure on top of my incentive, which will become my incentive.
So the pleasure which evolves emanates out of my initial incentive to stay alive, but by some special wizardry, is more necessary than my initial incentive to stay alive (otherwise I would not have needed to evolve it).
And although I cannot evolve all of an orgasm in my own life-time, I pass on the part I have evolved (sort of like passing on part-pregnancy) to those whom I am currently reproducing without orgasm, in order that they might be able to reproduce....eh...

Evolutionists like trying to pull themselves off the ground by their own bootstraps.
And then they tell you this occured because their bootstraps needed to be pulled.

The evolutionist has convinced himself that no intelligence behaves as one with intelligence would behave.

He reasons that an organism can memorize pleasure, and then change itself so that it will get more of the same in generations to come. So he has organisms with perception, who like joy-trips, and wished they'd evolved more of them in their own life-time.
I can just hear these organisms now: "If only we'd known what pleasure we could have had earlier! Now it's too late! But let's pass on what we have learned to our progeny whom we produce without this pleasure! Yeah! Great idea!"

Once again our evolution friends have our ends producing another's path to it.
In the Republic of Evolutionary, rain falls on people because cows are wearing raincoats.

Jet Black,

Here is a hint or 2 for you and your cronies (to help you get to the gist of things):

1. Pleasure has no utility where volition is absent.

You need to think again, this time at the fundamental level.

I am logging off now - it is late in this part of the world. When I next attend this thread, I will expect a thoughtful response to the full ramifications of the 2 pointers I have provided in bold font.

And I shall expect such from you.

ev·o·lu·tion

1. A gradual process in which something changes into a different and usually more complex or better form. See Synonyms at development.
2. Biology.
   1. Change in the genetic composition of a population during successive generations, as a result of natural selection acting on the genetic variation among individuals, and resulting in the development of new species.

Oh yeah...oops. Anyone know if they have orgasms ?