Ian McKellen's acclaimed performance in "King Lear" is coming to PBS, but a public TV executive was coy Saturday about whether his on-stage nude scene will be exposed on air.
PBS President and CEO Paula Kerger, who saw the play during its brief run in New York, said she was impressed by the production and recalled thinking, "This is the kind of thing people should have a chance to see."
So what did Kerger personally think of the nude scene with McKellen?
"It's powerful. His entire performance is quite powerful," she said.
The Royal Shakespeare Company's production, directed by Trevor Nunn, ran at Brooklyn Academy of Music's Harvey Theater last fall.
The 69-year-old McKellen's performance as Lear was lauded by The Associated Press for "expertly capturing the man's physical and mental decline." source
Q: Is "for the sake of the art" enough to overcome any objection to such an uncensored airing?
The man is 69. If a naked 69 year old man, or the number of his age, titilates you, I would encourage you to check out National Geographic with some 3rd graders.
I don't understand why Leer is supposed to be naked, but I saw a scene with Ofelia near nude, and her insanity was more pronounced.
As an art student, I saw plenty of naked men and women. If you are mature enough, you can actually see it without the sexual context. In fact, I was surprised when I would concentrate so hard that I could have been drawing a vase.
I don't understand why Leer is supposed to be naked, but I saw a scene with Ofelia near nude, and her insanity was more pronounced.
It appears to be more than just a matter of how pronounced the insanity is.
Some thoughts on the portrayal.
In 1968 Eric Porter of the Royal Shakespeare Company created a sensation when as King Lear he stripped to his underwear at the climactic line: "Off, off, you lendings!" It seemed a bit much for a scene that had traditionally been played with only a gesture at disrobing. Porter set a new standard, but not until 1997 did an actor go all the way and stand fully naked in the storm. That actor was Ian Holm, whose moment of total exposure in the Royal National Theatre production . . . seemed just the thing that an insane old monarch would do. Shakespeare probably never intended the action to be taken so far, but Holm made it completely believable. source
Which other actor would strip naked in the heath scene? Well, Sir Ian Holm (who did it first in Richard Eyre’s 1998 production of King Lear at the National Theatre). Is it necessary for either of these theatrical knights to show us their wee-wees? Only if you take “unaccommodated man” literally. In this tragedy of renunciation and unraveling, the Lear who’s lost in the wilderness is stripped naked of all power and illusion. Even so, I thought Mr. McKellen’s nude moment, though not essential, worked effectively because in the midst of Lear’s pitiful befuddlement of uncomprehending, wrecked old age he returned the fallen king to innocent childhood. source
Theatregoers should brace themselves when Sir Ian McKellen takes to the stage as King Lear next week.
For the actor's performance at the Royal Shakespeare Company comes with a warning.
Some audience members attending a preview were reportedly shocked when, as the tragic King teetering on the brink of madness, Sir Ian, 67, unexpectedly stripped naked on stage at the Courtyard Theatre in Stratford-on-Avon.
Now the RSC is to post notices in the theatre's foyer alerting more sensitive audience members to the nudity, but insisting there were no plans to get The Lord of the Rings star to cover up.
Sir Ian tears off his clothes in the "storm scene" as a disturbed Lear says: "Off, off you lendings! [clothes]. Come unbutton here."
The RSC said it was mystified as to why some should find his portrayal shocking.
A spokesman said: "The nudity takes place in the storm scene where Lear is going mad and is a very moving part in the play." However, they do intend to warn school groups in advance when the play opens on April 3.
Charles Spencer, theatre critic of The Daily Telegraph said: "When Holm did it, it was stunning in its effect".
"It is entirely right and appropriate, and people who are shocked should get a life, really.
"It is absolutely contextual. As Lear says 'Off, off you lendings', the stage directions say 'tears off his clothes'.
"It is entirely justified. This is a man on the very brink of madness." source
Ian McKellen's acclaimed performance in "King Lear" is coming to PBS, but a public TV executive was coy Saturday about whether his on-stage nude scene will be exposed on air.
PBS President and CEO Paula Kerger, who saw the play during its brief run in New York, said she was impressed by the production and recalled thinking, "This is the kind of thing people should have a chance to see."
So what did Kerger personally think of the nude scene with McKellen?
"It's powerful. His entire performance is quite powerful," she said.
The Royal Shakespeare Company's production, directed by Trevor Nunn, ran at Brooklyn Academy of Music's Harvey Theater last fall.
The 69-year-old McKellen's performance as Lear was lauded by The Associated Press for "expertly capturing the man's physical and mental decline." source
Q: Is "for the sake of the art" enough to overcome any objection to such an uncensored airing?
As long as it's broadcast post-watershed and with a "some scenes may offend" warning beforehand, I don't see why there should be any problem.
As ever with such things - if you don't like the idea, you don't have to watch it.
David.
__________________ David Brider
"...God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us." (Romans 5:8)
I don't understand people who get so worked up about it. I just see nudity as perfectly natural and think that people should be comfortable with their bodies. I agree on the "may offend some viewers" line being added, simply because there are always some who will be offended.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
*~*Society Moderator*~*
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "In conclusion, there is no conclusion. Things go on as they always have, getting weirder all the time." -The Principia Discordia
Ian McKellen's acclaimed performance in "King Lear" is coming to PBS, but a public TV executive was coy Saturday about whether his on-stage nude scene will be exposed on air.
PBS President and CEO Paula Kerger, who saw the play during its brief run in New York, said she was impressed by the production and recalled thinking, "This is the kind of thing people should have a chance to see."
So what did Kerger personally think of the nude scene with McKellen?
"It's powerful. His entire performance is quite powerful," she said.
The Royal Shakespeare Company's production, directed by Trevor Nunn, ran at Brooklyn Academy of Music's Harvey Theater last fall.
The 69-year-old McKellen's performance as Lear was lauded by The Associated Press for "expertly capturing the man's physical and mental decline." source
Q: Is "for the sake of the art" enough to overcome any objection to such an uncensored airing?
If it is "powerful," it is so without nudity and not because of it...