| Origins Theology Forum for the discussion of Creation Science (Young/Old) vs Theistic Evolution. Discussion of Atheistic Evolution should be taken to the Discussion and Debate forums. |  | 
6th July 2008, 11:06 AM
|  | Legend
 | | Join Date: 2nd March 2004 Location: Toronto
Posts: 11,849
Blessings: 61,096
Reps: 12,567,898,174,147,644 (power: 12,567,898,174,166) | | | Genetically Perfect? A common creationist conception is that at creation humanity (and perhaps all newly-created species) were "genetically perfect".
I have no idea what "genetically perfect" means.
But a recent discussion on the evolution of language gave me this thought.
One of the prerequisites for human language is a precise positioning of the pharynx.
In most mammals, including the other great apes, the pharynx is placed high up in the throat, above the opening of the esophagus.
Even human infants are born with the pharynx in the high position. This enables them to breathe while breastfeeding. They can breathe and swallow at the same time.
During the first year of life, however, the human pharynx moves from this position to a position lower in the throat. This frees up the back of the tongue, allowing it to be more flexible. This is an essential condition for the development of human speech, especially for pronouncing the back consonants (k, g, , ng, the back "l" of "ball" the Scottish "ch" etc.) and the back vowels "oh" and "ooo" where the tongue is raised at the back of the mouth. Irrespective of mental capacity, the basic physical reason other apes do not speak like humans is that their higher pharynx blocks these movements of the tongue.
So a dropped pharynx is clearly one of the traits indicative of the human species and one we certainly prize as essential to human communication.
A possible sign of "genetic perfection"?
But wait. The dropped pharynx is dangerously close to the opening of the esophagus and the reason we are prone to get food "going down the wrong way".
Animals with a higher pharynx don't choke on their food. But this is a common danger for humans, and not infrequently fatal. IOW the same genetic innovation that gave us our capacity for speech also introduces a sometimes fatal imperfection. What sort of "genetic perfection" calls for this sort of trade-off?
__________________ "Either we've got to pretend that Jesus was just as selfish as we are, or we've got to acknowledge that He commanded us to love the poor and serve the needy - and then admit that we just don't wanna do it." Steve Colbert | 
6th July 2008, 11:46 AM
|  | you are not reading this. 24  | | Join Date: 18th February 2005 Location: Shah Alam, Selangor
Posts: 8,060
Blessings: 18,357 My Mood
Reps: 15,461,686,232,085,960 (power: 15,461,686,232,100) | | To add on to that thought: what was humanity's genetic makeup going to be like? After all, if Adam and Eve were the genetically perfect human ancestors, and if the preservation of genetic perfection involves not having random mutations (since random mutations are a degradation of this genetic perfection), then all humans would be at most genetic recombinants of Adam and Eve. Disturbing thoughts, given modern conservative Christianity's predilection against clones.
__________________ And who that has understanding will suppose that the first, and second, and third day, and the evening and the morning, existed without a sun, and moon, and stars? - Origen, 215AD [De Principiis 4.1.16]
... to insist that the rising of the sun is figurative while the rising of the Son is literal is also hypocrisy.
- Geraldus Bouw, To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
| 
6th July 2008, 10:54 PM
|  | Veteran 59  | | Join Date: 5th April 2007
Posts: 9,295
Blessings: 124,508
Reps: 44,404,246,110,554,912 (power: 44,404,246,110,568) | | | My simple understanding is, indeed, very simple:
We now have all type of genetic defects (not sure what they are). So, the genetic perfection simply mean there was no such defects at the beginning. It may still do all type of other things. Functional inferiority on any of our organs seems not to be related to genetic imperfectness.
I know aging process is very complicate. But could we say the aging is caused by some genetic defects? If there were no genetic defects, how would an aged person look like? | 
7th July 2008, 01:45 AM
|  | Legend
 | | Join Date: 2nd March 2004 Location: Toronto
Posts: 11,849
Blessings: 61,096
Reps: 12,567,898,174,147,644 (power: 12,567,898,174,166) | | Originally Posted by juvenissun I know aging process is very complicate. But could we say the aging is caused by some genetic defects? If there were no genetic defects, how would an aged person look like?
No. Good or bad, we die with the same genes we are born with. Some genetic defects are strongly linked to premature death, but there doesn't seem to be any that are specifically linked to normal aging.
__________________ "Either we've got to pretend that Jesus was just as selfish as we are, or we've got to acknowledge that He commanded us to love the poor and serve the needy - and then admit that we just don't wanna do it." Steve Colbert | 
7th July 2008, 06:48 AM
|  | Senior Veteran 53  | | Join Date: 1st March 2004 Location: North of England
Posts: 5,540
Blessings: 90,442
Reps: 85,783,413,037,711,568 (power: 85,783,413,037,724) | | | Define perfection.
(Seems to me that we got all our ideas about "perfection" from the Greeks)
__________________ "Call some place paradise/Kiss it goodbye"
The Eagles, the Last Resort
Liberal Christians do it in context
"Literalism is the first line of defense of a mind that wants to put itself to sleep." Walter A Davis | 
16th July 2008, 07:46 PM
| | Senior Veteran
 | | Join Date: 30th January 2005
Posts: 2,538
Blessings: 92,969
Reps: 4,008 (power: 14) | | | I think the more interesting question is, if Adam and Eve are "genetically perfect", what was their skin color? What is the melanin level of someone that is "genetically perfect". I always found it funny how Adam and Eve are always depicted as white, so is white skin the sign of genetic perfection?
__________________ Entropy is driving the universe toward "heat death" --- Jesus is the force behind the Strong Nuclear Force that keeps the protons together - Colossians 1:17. - AV1611VET | 
16th July 2008, 08:10 PM
|  | Basically pulling an Obama (Thanks Calminian!) 51  | | Join Date: 31st March 2006 Location: Wales
Posts: 12,367
Blessings: 27,003,732 My Mood
Reps: 1,984,022,293,840,305,920 (power: 1,984,022,293,840,324) | | | Well, with the vapour canopy they needed all the UV they could get...
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
When you come to the Ammonites, do not
harass them or provoke them. Deut 2:19 | 
17th July 2008, 10:11 PM
| | Contributor
 | | Join Date: 18th October 2003 Location: washington state
Posts: 6,043
Blessings: 97,751
Reps: 9,867,845 (power: 9,882) | | | "Perfect" must mean when compared to an existing standard? |  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | | | |