Home | Be a Christian | Devotionals | Join Us! | Forums | Rules | F.A.Q.


Go Back   Christian Forums > Society > Society > Physical & Life Sciences > Creation & Evolution
Register BlogsPrayersJobsArcade Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Creation & Evolution Forum for the discussion of this important topic. This forum is open to non-believers. There is a Christians-only forum in the Christians-only section too.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 25th November 2003, 02:13 AM
Jet Black's Avatar
WinAce > cdesign proponentsists

30 Gender: Female Faith: Atheist Country: England Member For 5 Years
View Profile Pic
 
Join Date: 24th June 2003
Location: Chiark
Posts: 18,445
Blessings: 68,391
Reps: 16,712 (power: 41)
Jet Black is a splendid one to behold
Jet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to behold
the bible and the 2nd law of thermodynamics

I was skimming through an online bible, and I am sure I must have missed a bit. the second law of thermodynamics... I am sure it must be in there somewhere since most fundamentalists seem to adhere to this law like their entire salvation depends on it. perhaps it is an incorrect version and I missed it because I was looking for entropy rather than decay. what is it with fundamentalists misunderstanding this so abused law of physics?
__________________
MSci MSc ARCS DIC PhD..... yes, I am bragging.
Reply With Quote
Become a CF Site Supporter Today and Make These Ads Go Away!

  #2  
Old 25th November 2003, 04:40 AM
USAF's Avatar
.

Gender: Male Faith: Non-Denominational Country: United States Member For 5 Years
 
Join Date: 15th November 2003
Location: Republic of California
Posts: 422
Blessings: 34,640
Reps: 10 (power: 0)
USAF is on a distinguished road
In what aspect of the 2nd law? (in general)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 25th November 2003, 04:43 AM
Jet Black's Avatar
WinAce > cdesign proponentsists

30 Gender: Female Faith: Atheist Country: England Member For 5 Years
View Profile Pic
 
Join Date: 24th June 2003
Location: Chiark
Posts: 18,445
Blessings: 68,391
Reps: 16,712 (power: 41)
Jet Black is a splendid one to behold
Jet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by USAF
In what aspect of the 2nd law? (in general)
generally the idea that the 2LOD forbids evolution.
__________________
MSci MSc ARCS DIC PhD..... yes, I am bragging.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 25th November 2003, 06:03 AM
USAF's Avatar
.

Gender: Male Faith: Non-Denominational Country: United States Member For 5 Years
 
Join Date: 15th November 2003
Location: Republic of California
Posts: 422
Blessings: 34,640
Reps: 10 (power: 0)
USAF is on a distinguished road
as I said before



you can apply a law of man to a theory respectively.





How can you apply faith to a theory of man?





I don’t see in what aspect a law of man can be used as a weapon of faith, to disprove a theory of man. So I don’t see why people would be using such an idea as a backing to faith, to disprove evolution



Or vise-versa

Last edited by USAF; 25th November 2003 at 06:05 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 25th November 2003, 06:06 AM
Jet Black's Avatar
WinAce > cdesign proponentsists

30 Gender: Female Faith: Atheist Country: England Member For 5 Years
View Profile Pic
 
Join Date: 24th June 2003
Location: Chiark
Posts: 18,445
Blessings: 68,391
Reps: 16,712 (power: 41)
Jet Black is a splendid one to behold
Jet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to behold
that is completely off topic.
__________________
MSci MSc ARCS DIC PhD..... yes, I am bragging.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25th November 2003, 06:44 AM
USAF's Avatar
.

Gender: Male Faith: Non-Denominational Country: United States Member For 5 Years
 
Join Date: 15th November 2003
Location: Republic of California
Posts: 422
Blessings: 34,640
Reps: 10 (power: 0)
USAF is on a distinguished road
Well you were referring to an online bible and how salvation depends on a law of mans science



My point is that there are 2 completely separate discussions





Are you asking about salvation + 2LOD or Entropy vs. decay?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 25th November 2003, 08:04 AM
Jet Black's Avatar
WinAce > cdesign proponentsists

30 Gender: Female Faith: Atheist Country: England Member For 5 Years
View Profile Pic
 
Join Date: 24th June 2003
Location: Chiark
Posts: 18,445
Blessings: 68,391
Reps: 16,712 (power: 41)
Jet Black is a splendid one to behold
Jet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by USAF
Well you were referring to an online bible and how salvation depends on a law of mans science



My point is that there are 2 completely separate discussions





Are you asking about salvation + 2LOD or Entropy vs. decay?
I am not saying that salvation depends on it, I am just pointing out how some Creationists seem to cling to the second law as if their entire faith depended on it. they even announce that it is a LAW and not a THEORY .... sometimes in bold or italics (illustrating their lack of knowledge of what the words mean) it is quite perplexing to me why they just don't let it go when they are repeatedly shown that they are wrong.
__________________
MSci MSc ARCS DIC PhD..... yes, I am bragging.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 25th November 2003, 08:22 AM
Frumious Bandersnatch's Avatar
Contributor

63 Gender: Male Faith: Unitarian Member For 5 Years
 
Join Date: 4th March 2003
Posts: 5,290
Blessings: 34,480
Reps: 292,961 (power: 304)
Frumious Bandersnatch has much to be proud ofFrumious Bandersnatch has much to be proud ofFrumious Bandersnatch has much to be proud ofFrumious Bandersnatch has much to be proud ofFrumious Bandersnatch has much to be proud ofFrumious Bandersnatch has much to be proud ofFrumious Bandersnatch has much to be proud ofFrumious Bandersnatch has much to be proud ofFrumious Bandersnatch has much to be proud of
Frumious Bandersnatch has much to be proud ofFrumious Bandersnatch has much to be proud ofFrumious Bandersnatch has much to be proud ofFrumious Bandersnatch has much to be proud ofFrumious Bandersnatch has much to be proud ofFrumious Bandersnatch has much to be proud ofFrumious Bandersnatch has much to be proud ofFrumious Bandersnatch has much to be proud ofFrumious Bandersnatch has much to be proud ofFrumious Bandersnatch has much to be proud ofFrumious Bandersnatch has much to be proud ofFrumious Bandersnatch has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by Jet Black
I am not saying that salvation depends on it, I am just pointing out how some Creationists seem to cling to the second law as if their entire faith depended on it. they even announce that it is a LAW and not a THEORY .... sometimes in bold or italics (illustrating their lack of knowledge of what the words mean) it is quite perplexing to me why they just don't let it go when they are repeatedly shown that they are wrong.
The second law is a law and not a theory. There is a theoretical formulation in statistical mechanics, due to Boltzmann in classical mechanics and Gibbs in quantum systems, that explains second law behavior with some success in those systems that behave according to the fundamental postulates of statistical mechanics, but the second law as decribed by Clausius was based purely on observations of Carnot cycles in heat engines.

While many but not all creationists do indeed claim that evolution violates the second law none can specify which step required for evolution violates the second law. Since no step required for evolution can be shown to violate the second evolution can not be shown to violate the second law.

The frumious Bandersnatch
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 25th November 2003, 08:38 AM
Jet Black's Avatar
WinAce > cdesign proponentsists

30 Gender: Female Faith: Atheist Country: England Member For 5 Years
View Profile Pic
 
Join Date: 24th June 2003
Location: Chiark
Posts: 18,445
Blessings: 68,391
Reps: 16,712 (power: 41)
Jet Black is a splendid one to behold
Jet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to beholdJet Black is a splendid one to behold
I recognise that. it is just the way they misuse the words.
__________________
MSci MSc ARCS DIC PhD..... yes, I am bragging.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 25th November 2003, 01:09 PM
Veteran

Gender: Male Faith: Christian Country: Canada Member For 5 Years
 
Join Date: 19th September 2003
Posts: 1,726
Blessings: 34,841
Reps: 207 (power: 0)
Mike Flynn is a jewel in the roughMike Flynn is a jewel in the roughMike Flynn is a jewel in the rough
Originally Posted by Jet Black
I am sure it must be in there somewhere since most fundamentalists seem to adhere to this law like their entire salvation depends on it. perhaps it is an incorrect version and I missed it because I was looking for entropy rather than decay. what is it with fundamentalists misunderstanding this so abused law of physics?
Of course, they are misinterpreting both the science and the theology when they say that the second law and the Bible falsify evolution. However, the Biblical concept of decay bears some (loose) resemblance to the second law.

The basic theology is this: the Bible says the world (the universe?) is prone to decay. IOW, everything we see, including our physical bodies, decays to such an extent that it will eventually be destroyed (or rendered useless) in that process. In this sense, we see some compatibility with entropy. The second law tells us that while the total energy in the universe is fixed, it becomes less useful over time (waste heat). (you can see some compatibility, right?)

The real trouble is, according to the Bible, because we have chosen the world over God, then our spiritual selves are now linked to the pattern of this world. IOW, they too are prone to decay and become less useful over time (and will ultimately be detroyed in the process). Here the analogy of a preservative comes in handy (to prevent decay). Thats why the Gospels refer to the 'salt of the earth'. The body of Christ can prevent such spiritual decay.

Obviously, no one needs to refer to the 2nd law to grasp the theology. Just look at how an old piece of meat rots or how a human grows old and dies. Thats what the Bible was referring to when it speaks of 'decay'.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Return to Creation & Evolution

Thread Tools
Display Modes



 
Become a CF Site Supporter Today and Make These Ads Go Away!
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:33 PM.


vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios