| Origins Theology Forum for the discussion of Creation Science (Young/Old) vs Theistic Evolution. Discussion of Atheistic Evolution should be taken to the Discussion and Debate forums. |  | | 
3rd March 2008, 12:11 PM
|  | The Rapture can take a hike 35 
| | Join Date: 30th October 2003 Location: Scotland
Posts: 7,669
Blessings: 133,471 My Mood
Reps: 5,038,481,752,567,930 (power: 5,038,481,752,583) | | Originally Posted by ClearSky ...and it is not plausible that He waited billions of years for evolution to happen.
This line of argument pops up from time to time, what do you think a few billion years matters to an eternal God? How long do you think God was 'waiting' before he began his work of Creation? | 
3rd March 2008, 12:28 PM
|  | Regular Member
 | | Join Date: 21st December 2007
Posts: 143
Blessings: 90,712
Reps: 3,418 (power: 8) | | Originally Posted by anonymous1515 Ah, so you would be one of those who accepts "microevolution" but denies "macroevolution" (i.e. common descent)?
I think distinctions between microevolution and macroevolution are artificial. The distinction that matters is between evolution as a theory of biology, and a theory of history. Evolution theory can be completely consistent and flawless, just as Newtonian gravity was, and still be wrong in the context of our world or history.
Common descent is not suited to decide between direct and indirect (evolutional) creation. Is it very likely that God did not create all species from scratch, but used his experiences and genetic material from prior creations. Originally Posted by theFijian This line of argument pops up from time to time, what do you think a few billion years matters to an eternal God? How long do you think God was 'waiting' before he began his work of Creation?
Here we enter the realm of speculation, of course. But we can make educated guesses.
A billion years matters for God because it would matter for a human, and we are made in his image. Read Numeri and you'll learn a lot about God's impatience.
As to the time God was waiting before he began with creation work, I think he waited not even a second after His decision to create a human being in His image. The real question is when in His life time did He make this decision. But as we attribute eternity to God's existence, we can't answer this question. | 
3rd March 2008, 06:15 PM
|  | Senior Veteran

| | Join Date: 20th June 2006
Posts: 3,347
Blessings: 1,072,785 My Mood
Reps: 27,749,724,098,880,132 (power: 27,749,724,098,889) | | Originally Posted by anonymous1515 Ah, so you would be one of those who accepts "microevolution" but denies "macroevolution" (i.e. common descent)?
That is still quite interesting. Do you believe that the evidence suggests common ancestry, even if you do not believe we were created this way? In other words, do you understand why people would believe in common descent?
Sure, common descent for beagles and great danes makes sense.
The analogous argument for all primate or vertebrates, is, to us, an unproven inference.
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. (as it is written, "I have made you a father of many nations") To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. in the presence of Him whom he believed--God, who gives life to the dead and calls those things which do not exist as though they did; | 
3rd March 2008, 06:41 PM
|  | you are not reading this. 24  | | Join Date: 18th February 2005 Location: Shah Alam, Selangor
Posts: 8,060
Blessings: 18,378 My Mood
Reps: 15,461,686,232,085,960 (power: 15,461,686,232,100) | | Originally Posted by ClearSky I do not accept it as historic fact because the mere existence of an evolution mechanism does not prove that we were really created this way. Even if you don't take Scripture literally, and even if you accept that the many people who wrote it had to work around scientific topics that they could not have understood in 500 BC, Scripture is very clear in that most life forms were directly created and didn't evolve.
But if we assume the ideas you state (in passing, your date of 500BC is extremely generous - even most JEPD hypothesizers don't think the Torah was written that late, AFAIK!), doesn't the possibility of evolution fall out straightaway? After all, Scripture's "clarity" (which I don't see, by the by, but you apparently do) about the direct creation of living organisms may well simply be God's way of working around the scientific topic of evolution that they could not have understood in 500BC, couldn't it? Originally Posted by ClearSky Creation by evolution also does not fit to the character of God. He had a very active, determined mind set at that time, and it is not plausible that He waited billions of years for evolution to happen. Direct creation just fits God a lot better. But nevertheless He set up the laws of nature in a way that the universe can continue to exist by itself, and new species can evolve without His intervention.
Why a very active, determined mindset "at that time"? Has God's mindset changed since Creation? Is He in a funk because Adam ate the wrong fruit? I can only point out how little "drive" God has had. He left thousands of years between Adam and Abraham. Three generations between Abraham and Jacob, and then thousands of years more between Jacob and David, thousands of years more between David and Jesus, and two thousand and God alone knows how many more years between the First and Second Coming.
God is obviously used to patience. Furthermore God is outside time, and thus how could He "wait"? He sees all things in all time at once. Between His knowledge of what happened 5 million years ago (to us) and what will happen two days from now (to us) no "time" passes for Him; so why should He be considered to "wait" as He watches the effects of events 5 million years ago play out today? No, I think God is bigger than that.
__________________ And who that has understanding will suppose that the first, and second, and third day, and the evening and the morning, existed without a sun, and moon, and stars? - Origen, 215AD [De Principiis 4.1.16]
... to insist that the rising of the sun is figurative while the rising of the Son is literal is also hypocrisy.
- Geraldus Bouw, To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
| 
3rd March 2008, 08:31 PM
|  | Soldier of Knowledge 28 
| | Join Date: 18th January 2004 Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,720
Blessings: 59,513
Reps: 18,604,695,596,698 (power: 18,604,695,606) | | Originally Posted by ClearSky I think distinctions between microevolution and macroevolution are artificial. The distinction that matters is between evolution as a theory of biology, and a theory of history. Evolution theory can be completely consistent and flawless, just as Newtonian gravity was, and still be wrong in the context of our world or history.
I’m not sure I understand what you’re saying here. Are you saying that it’s possible for a theory to be completely consistent with all of the available data and yet still be wrong, the way Newtonian gravity was?
Even though that’s true, there’s something about this you should realize. The more experimental data there is that supports a theory, the more accurate a description of reality that theory tends to be. Newtonian physics is still capable of explaining 99% of physical interactions, the only exceptions being if you’re measuring thousandths of seconds or traveling at several times the speed of sound. If the theory of evolution is capable of explaining this much evidence regarding earth’s history, we can expect it to be about as accurate a description of history as Newton’s laws were of physics, even if it isn’t perfect.
The theory of evolution has changed over the years, the most obvious change being the incorporation of how heredity works. (Genetics hadn’t been discovered yet in Darwin’s time.) There’s certainly a good chance that other such discoveries in the future will cause it to be modified again, meaning that our current understanding of evolution won’t have been exactly right. But judging by the way this has gone with scientific theories in all areas (not just biology), future versions of evolutionary theory won’t be any more different from our present version of it than our present version differs from the version Darwin came up with.
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | 
5th March 2008, 08:42 AM
|  | Regular Member
 | | Join Date: 21st December 2007
Posts: 143
Blessings: 90,712
Reps: 3,418 (power: 8) | | Originally Posted by shernren Why a very active, determined mindset "at that time"? Has God's mindset changed since Creation? Is He in a funk because Adam ate the wrong fruit? I can only point out how little "drive" God has had. He left thousands of years between Adam and Abraham. Three generations between Abraham and Jacob, and then thousands of years more between Jacob and David, thousands of years more between David and Jesus, and two thousand and God alone knows how many more years between the First and Second Coming.
Yes, God's mindset has definitely changed since Creation in many ways, especially in becoming less aggressive and less controlling towards humans. You can see the impressive change of God's character in scripture.
Directly after creation he reacted in massive, extreme ways on human acts. He cursed the whole creation because of one man's disobedience. Then he wiped out almost all life in the flood. Afterwards the first change occurred. He wiped out two cities, but wouldn't have done that if he had found 5 good people in them. He killed the firstborn children of the Egypts, but was forced to for demonstrating his superiority over the Egyptian gods. He grow impatient with Israel and intended to kill all of them, but could be dissuaded from that by Moses. Then His change continued. He interfered less and less in human affairs, and became more and more merciful and forgiving. In the end He was so forgiving that he did not even fulfill the expectation of a physical liberation of the suppressed Jewish people from the Assyrians, the Greeks, and the Romans. In the mindset He had during the exodus, 1500 years before, He would have just wiped out Israel's enemies in an instant.
So I see a definite change of His character, from a very aggressive and fierce warrior God 1500 BC, to a withdrawn, peaceful, and forgiving God, culminating in the sacrifice of His son. He said through His son: "Turn the other cheek" and "My realm is not of this world". This is very different to His behavior 1500 years before. After the resurrection of Christ we have no report anymore of any direct activity by Him in our world. Originally Posted by shernren God is obviously used to patience. Furthermore God is outside time, and thus how could He "wait"? He sees all things in all time at once. Between His knowledge of what happened 5 million years ago (to us) and what will happen two days from now (to us) no "time" passes for Him; so why should He be considered to "wait" as He watches the effects of events 5 million years ago play out today? No, I think God is bigger than that.
The later God, yes. But the God described in Genesis, especially Numeri? He did not wait patiently for anything at that time.
Last edited by ClearSky; 5th March 2008 at 11:49 AM.
| 
5th March 2008, 07:39 PM
|  | you are not reading this. 24  | | Join Date: 18th February 2005 Location: Shah Alam, Selangor
Posts: 8,060
Blessings: 18,378 My Mood
Reps: 15,461,686,232,085,960 (power: 15,461,686,232,100) | | Originally Posted by ClearSky Yes, God's mindset has definitely changed since Creation in many ways, especially in becoming less aggressive and less controlling towards humans. You can see the impressive change of God's character in scripture.
Directly after creation he reacted in massive, extreme ways on human acts. He cursed the whole creation because of one man's disobedience. Then he wiped out almost all life in the flood. Afterwards the first change occurred. He wiped out two cities, but wouldn't have done that if he had found 5 good people in them. He killed the firstborn children of the Egypts, but was forced to for demonstrating his superiority over the Egyptian gods. He grow impatient with Israel and intended to kill all of them, but could be dissuaded from that by Moses. Then His change continued. He interfered less and less in human affairs, and became more and more merciful and forgiving. In the end He was so forgiving that he did not even fulfill the expectation of a physical liberation of the suppressed Jewish people from the Assyrians, the Greeks, and the Romans. In the mindset He had during the exodus, 1500 years before, He would have just wiped out Israel's enemies in an instant.
So I see a definite change of His character, from a very aggressive and fierce warrior God 1500 BC, to a withdrawn, peaceful, and forgiving God, culminating in the sacrifice of His son. He said through His son: "Turn the other cheek" and "My realm is not of this world". This is very different to His behavior 1500 years before. After the resurrection of Christ we have no report anymore of any direct activity by Him in our world.
The later God, yes. But the God described in Genesis, especially Numeri? He did not wait patiently for anything at that time.
Well done. You have essentially laid the logical foundation for the atheist belief that the Bible was not written as a consistent book.
If creationists can be this liberal I don't know what to call myself any more.
__________________ And who that has understanding will suppose that the first, and second, and third day, and the evening and the morning, existed without a sun, and moon, and stars? - Origen, 215AD [De Principiis 4.1.16]
... to insist that the rising of the sun is figurative while the rising of the Son is literal is also hypocrisy.
- Geraldus Bouw, To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
| 
5th March 2008, 10:18 PM
|  | Senior Veteran

| | Join Date: 20th June 2006
Posts: 3,347
Blessings: 1,072,785 My Mood
Reps: 27,749,724,098,880,132 (power: 27,749,724,098,889) | | Originally Posted by theFijian This line of argument pops up from time to time, what do you think a few billion years matters to an eternal God? How long do you think God was 'waiting' before he began his work of Creation?
I think one second matters to God when his creatures are in the agony of death.
A few billion years is lots of seconds
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. (as it is written, "I have made you a father of many nations") To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. in the presence of Him whom he believed--God, who gives life to the dead and calls those things which do not exist as though they did; | 
5th March 2008, 10:20 PM
|  | Senior Veteran 29 
| | Join Date: 6th March 2006
Posts: 6,088
Blessings: 53,547
Reps: 18,889,155,825,852,136 (power: 18,889,155,825,864) | | Originally Posted by busterdog I think one second matters to God when his creatures are in the agony of death.
A few billion years is lots of seconds
So is a few thousand years. Why didn't God just send a saviour immediately after the Fall?
__________________ "There is evidence for evolution, gobs and gobs of it. It is not just speculation or a faith choice or an assumption or a religion. It is a productive framework for lots of biological research, and it has amazing explanatory power. There is no conspiracy to hide the truth about the failure of evolution. There has really been no failure of evolution as a scientific theory. It works, and it works well." -- creation scientist Dr. Todd Wood | 
5th March 2008, 10:22 PM
|  | Senior Veteran

| | Join Date: 20th June 2006
Posts: 3,347
Blessings: 1,072,785 My Mood
Reps: 27,749,724,098,880,132 (power: 27,749,724,098,889) | | Originally Posted by ClearSky Yes, God's mindset has definitely changed since Creation in many ways, especially in becoming less aggressive and less controlling towards humans. You can see the impressive change of God's character in scripture.
Directly after creation he reacted in massive, extreme ways on human acts. He cursed the whole creation because of one man's disobedience. Then he wiped out almost all life in the flood. Afterwards the first change occurred. He wiped out two cities, but wouldn't have done that if he had found 5 good people in them. He killed the firstborn children of the Egypts, but was forced to for demonstrating his superiority over the Egyptian gods. He grow impatient with Israel and intended to kill all of them, but could be dissuaded from that by Moses. Then His change continued. He interfered less and less in human affairs, and became more and more merciful and forgiving. In the end He was so forgiving that he did not even fulfill the expectation of a physical liberation of the suppressed Jewish people from the Assyrians, the Greeks, and the Romans. In the mindset He had during the exodus, 1500 years before, He would have just wiped out Israel's enemies in an instant.
So I see a definite change of His character, from a very aggressive and fierce warrior God 1500 BC, to a withdrawn, peaceful, and forgiving God, culminating in the sacrifice of His son. He said through His son: "Turn the other cheek" and "My realm is not of this world". This is very different to His behavior 1500 years before. After the resurrection of Christ we have no report anymore of any direct activity by Him in our world.
The later God, yes. But the God described in Genesis, especially Numeri? He did not wait patiently for anything at that time.
Explain what you mean by mindset. I am not sure you are being understood.
One of my favorite verses: Exd 4:24¶And it came to pass by the way in the inn, that the LORD met him, and sought to kill him.
But, of course, Zipporah throws down the foreskin and God doesn't kill Moses.
Did God change his mind?
Not likely.
Apparently God sort of goes through the motions while people, who were given dominion over this world act out their laws and sometimes, as Zipporah does, get around to acting out His.
My guess is that you think it SEEMS that His mindset changes, or that we might as well speak of a changing mindset, though we know that God is not a man that he should repent.
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. (as it is written, "I have made you a father of many nations") To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. in the presence of Him whom he believed--God, who gives life to the dead and calls those things which do not exist as though they did; |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | | | |