Believing in God and Evolution

Here is the claim I wonder how many agree with it.
The more religious people claim evolution is not what made the human race, God is what made the human race, the more wrong they look. Meaning as the evidence of fossils and similarity in our DNA with other biological life comes to an astounding 98% similar to a chimpanzee, the more it looks religious people are wrong and in fact there is no God?

To me it looks like religious people are presenting an image that, you can't believe in evolution and believe in God at the same time, there by making it harder for a honest to goodness scientist who loves science, to come anywhere near believing in God?

Personally I believe that people who reject good hard scientific facts, that are accepted as facts among the leading experts in main stream science are fanatical, and are not doing good science.

So are religious people making it harder to believe in God when you see them reject science?

The more religious people claim evolution is not what made the human race, God is what made the human race, the more wrong they look.

Meaning as the evidence of fossils and similarity in our DNA with other biological life comes to an astounding 98% similar to a chimpanzee, the more it looks religious people are wrong and in fact there is no God?

The more religious people try to claim evolution did not occur in the human race the more it looks like you can't believe in God and evolution at the same time?

In other words in your opinion are the clerics, who can't understand evolution, the pastors who deny evolution yet claim God has revealed to them what is okay, and not okay to believe and still be a believer. Are these people making it harder to believe in God?

To me it looks like religious people are presenting an image that, you can't believe in evolution and believe in God at the same time, there by making it harder for a honest to goodness scientist who loves science, to come anywhere near believing in God?

Personally I believe that people who reject good hard scientific facts, that are accepted as facts among the leading experts in main stream science are fanatical, and are not doing good science.

People are rejecting science now because they think their religious beliefes are forcing them to do so.

It is like in Florida, everybody wants to be amish and reject science I can't believe what I am seeing, and it is making it real hard to believe in God, when they are so wrong about a proven fact for God's sakes.

So are religious people making it harder to believe in God when you see them reject science?

We're supposed to look wrong in the eyes of evolution.

Actually it should be the other way around. The more you claim evolution did occur, the farther you distance yourselves from those who believe in God and the Creation at the same time. I personally don't trapse around claiming evolution didn't happen; I trapse around claiming creation did happen.

As it should be.

Usually, even a non-Christian knows something about the earth, the heavens, and the other elements of this world, about the motion and orbit of the stars and even their size and relative positions, about the predictable eclipses of the sun and moon, the cycles of the years and the seasons, about the kinds of animals, shrubs, stones, and so forth, and this knowledge he hold to as being certain from reason and experience. Now, it is a disgraceful and dangerous thing for an infidel to hear a Christian, presumably giving the meaning of Holy Scripture, talking nonsense on these topics; and we should take all means to prevent such an embarrassing situation, in which people show up vast ignorance in a Christian and laugh it to scorn. The shame is not so much that an ignorant individual is derided, but that people outside the household of faith think our sacred writers held such opinions, and, to the great loss of those for whose salvation we toil, the writers of our Scripture are criticized and rejected as unlearned men. If they find a Christian mistaken in a field which they themselves know well and hear him maintaining his foolish opinions about our books, how are they going to believe those books in matters concerning the resurrection of the dead, the hope of eternal life, and the kingdom of heaven, when they think their pages are full of falsehoods and on facts which they themselves have learnt from experience and the light of reason? Reckless and incompetent expounders of Holy Scripture bring untold trouble and sorrow on their wiser brethren when they are caught in one of their mischievous false opinions and are taken to task by those who are not bound by the authority of our sacred books. For then, to defend their utterly foolish and obviously untrue statements, they will try to call upon Holy Scripture for proof and even recite from memory many passages which they think support their position, although they understand neither what they say nor the things about which they make assertion.