Home | Be a Christian | Devotionals | Join Us! | Forums | Rules | F.A.Q.


Go Back   Christian Forums > Discussion and Debate > Physical & Life Sciences > Creation & Evolution
Register BlogsPrayersJobsArcade Calendar Mark Forums Read

Creation & Evolution Forum for the discussion of this important topic. This forum is open to non-believers. There is a Christians-only forum in the Christians-only section too.

Reply
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #151  
Unread 14th November 2003, 07:27 PM
Just say NO to YEC'ism

Faith: Christian Country: United States Member For 5 Years
 
Join Date: 13th May 2002
Location: Gainesville
Posts: 449
Blessings: 149,137
Reps: 314 (power: 0)
JGMEERT is a jewel in the roughJGMEERT is a jewel in the roughJGMEERT is a jewel in the roughJGMEERT is a jewel in the rough
[quote=FEZZILLA]
Originally Posted by Mike Flynn
I missed this little gem.

1. evolution does NOT SAY ETERNAL BEGINNING.



"The cosmos is all that is or ever was or ever will be." ~Carl Sagon

He's considered one of everlutions man-gods.
JM: I've never heard of Carl Sagon. Carl Sagan, now there's a smart dude!

Cheers

Joe Meert
Reply With Quote
Become a CF Site Supporter Today and Make These Ads Go Away!

  #152  
Unread 14th November 2003, 08:08 PM
Regular Member

43 Gender: Male Faith: Christian Country: United States Member For 5 Years
 
Join Date: 24th June 2003
Location: Team America
Posts: 402
Blessings: 169,404
Reps: 10 (power: 0)
FEZZILLA is on a distinguished road
TALKING POINTS:

First off, i'd like you all to look up Jeremiah 31:35-37. I think this would enlighten you a little.

MegaNote: In Matthew 19:4-5 Jesus quotes and acknowleges Gen.1:27 & 2:24 has literal history! This contradicts the Catholic church and Theistic evolution!!
Yes, i did say the Catholic Church! The Pope denies Genesis chapter one and two as literal truth. On page 6, in the "New American Bible (Saint Joseph Edition)," You'll see the Popes signature stating he agrees with the teachings of the NAB. On page 19 under "6. Literary genres or forms," you'll see-"b) The Allegory." Vatican calls Genesis 2,3;4,1-16;6--8;11,19, folktales, or in scientific error. In other words, Jesus Christ is a human liar and son of a b*tch! Theistic evolution also agrees that the bible is not literal truth. All this doubt because of Darwin, the messiah.

Lev.11:6 says the rabbit chews the cud. Evolution biology disagrees.
But when we find out that the rabbit re-eats its partly digested fecal pellets, we find biology in error and the bible right!
So why do you christians of this forum not trust the prophetic word of God?

Do you know anything at all about the "New Age Movement" and what it consist of? Terms like "Scientific Atheism" and "Secular Humanism" come into mind when we apply evolution to society. Darwin inspired Marx, Lenin,Stalin,Hitler and Paul Kurtz (author of the American commy liberal book "Humanist Manifesto 1&2." Man like Julian Huxley wrote about Eugenics, and his 'indirect' dream of breeding out christians through evolution education. Richard Dawkins, teaches in his book "The blind Watchmaker" that we who disagree with evolution are Ignorant, and stupid. Combine this with J.Huxley's eugenic speach and you have christian prosecution and the mark of the beast. For christians can avoid prosecution if they accept the mark of the Darwinian Christ. All right, maybe i'm going to far on the mark of the beast talk; but it has come into mind and it is possible that evolution and HM2's Autonomous Man is the fulfillment of a Revelation prophecy. Let me dig further and see what we have.
Anton LaVey wrote the "Satanic Bible" in 1969. This whole book was a materialistic concept of Darwinian evolution. LaVey only acknowledges Satan has a symbol, yet in the same breath, encourages satanic worship. Evolution is Satan's established religion. If you play the Eagles song "Hotal California" backwards you'll hear, "Yes, Satan! He organized his own religion." Darwin and LaVey agree! The eagles themselves had strong ties with the church of Satan.

From the beginning satan hated God's creation. He even wanted to be God and start his own religion. So how can christians worship both Satan and Christ ? They can't! The bible and evolution teach twon different beliefs. And no, Evolution isn't the final say in science. Its the science of one religion vs. the science of another. The bible is without error, and "Origins" is gull of them.

MEASURING the stars of the universe. Evolution astronomers are frustrated because star measurements say that the stars are older than the red shift measurements say about the universe. So, if the universe is younger than the stars, then the universe had a beginning. This info i got from the Science channel which is evolution run (like most media outlets).
Science really don't know how old the universe is. Their equipment is only so usefull. So if you think science has solved it all, think again and read you bible.

And thats the memo.
Reply With Quote
  #153  
Unread 14th November 2003, 08:10 PM
Arikay's Avatar
HI

31 Gender: Male Faith: Taoist Country: United States Member For 5 Years
 
Join Date: 23rd January 2003
Posts: 12,645
Blessings: 151,233
Reps: 5,365 (power: 29)
Arikay is a name known to all
Arikay is a name known to allArikay is a name known to allArikay is a name known to allArikay is a name known to allArikay is a name known to allArikay is a name known to allArikay is a name known to allArikay is a name known to allArikay is a name known to allArikay is a name known to allArikay is a name known to allArikay is a name known to allArikay is a name known to all
So, the question is, how many posts before Fezz decides he wants to misquote someone again?

Fezz, the irony of your statement is that you do not trust gods creationist, but you do trust your own personal interpretation of the bible. You have put yourself above god.
__________________

Wei wu wei

Green faeries
Reply With Quote
  #154  
Unread 14th November 2003, 08:13 PM
Arikay's Avatar
HI

31 Gender: Male Faith: Taoist Country: United States Member For 5 Years
 
Join Date: 23rd January 2003
Posts: 12,645
Blessings: 151,233
Reps: 5,365 (power: 29)
Arikay is a name known to all
Arikay is a name known to allArikay is a name known to allArikay is a name known to allArikay is a name known to allArikay is a name known to allArikay is a name known to allArikay is a name known to allArikay is a name known to allArikay is a name known to allArikay is a name known to allArikay is a name known to allArikay is a name known to allArikay is a name known to all
Dawkins was right, as you appear to be ignorant about evolution.

Maybe go and learn about it, then try again.

BTW, you should look up what "chewing cud" really means as you got that wrong too.

Originally Posted by FEZZILLA
TALKING POINTS:

First off, i'd like you all to look up Jeremiah 31:35-37. I think this would enlighten you a little.

MegaNote: In Matthew 19:4-5 Jesus quotes and acknowleges Gen.1:27 & 2:24 has literal history! This contradicts the Catholic church and Theistic evolution!!
Yes, i did say the Catholic Church! The Pope denies Genesis chapter one and two as literal truth. On page 6, in the "New American Bible (Saint Joseph Edition)," You'll see the Popes signature stating he agrees with the teachings of the NAB. On page 19 under "6. Literary genres or forms," you'll see-"b) The Allegory." Vatican calls Genesis 2,3;4,1-16;6--8;11,19, folktales, or in scientific error. In other words, Jesus Christ is a human liar and son of a b*tch! Theistic evolution also agrees that the bible is not literal truth. All this doubt because of Darwin, the messiah.

Lev.11:6 says the rabbit chews the cud. Evolution biology disagrees.
But when we find out that the rabbit re-eats its partly digested fecal pellets, we find biology in error and the bible right!
So why do you christians of this forum not trust the prophetic word of God?

Do you know anything at all about the "New Age Movement" and what it consist of? Terms like "Scientific Atheism" and "Secular Humanism" come into mind when we apply evolution to society. Darwin inspired Marx, Lenin,Stalin,Hitler and Paul Kurtz (author of the American commy liberal book "Humanist Manifesto 1&2." Man like Julian Huxley wrote about Eugenics, and his 'indirect' dream of breeding out christians through evolution education. Richard Dawkins, teaches in his book "The blind Watchmaker" that we who disagree with evolution are Ignorant, and stupid. Combine this with J.Huxley's eugenic speach and you have christian prosecution and the mark of the beast. For christians can avoid prosecution if they accept the mark of the Darwinian Christ. All right, maybe i'm going to far on the mark of the beast talk; but it has come into mind and it is possible that evolution and HM2's Autonomous Man is the fulfillment of a Revelation prophecy. Let me dig further and see what we have.
Anton LaVey wrote the "Satanic Bible" in 1969. This whole book was a materialistic concept of Darwinian evolution. LaVey only acknowledges Satan has a symbol, yet in the same breath, encourages satanic worship. Evolution is Satan's established religion. If you play the Eagles song "Hotal California" backwards you'll hear, "Yes, Satan! He organized his own religion." Darwin and LaVey agree! The eagles themselves had strong ties with the church of Satan.

From the beginning satan hated God's creation. He even wanted to be God and start his own religion. So how can christians worship both Satan and Christ ? They can't! The bible and evolution teach twon different beliefs. And no, Evolution isn't the final say in science. Its the science of one religion vs. the science of another. The bible is without error, and "Origins" is gull of them.

MEASURING the stars of the universe. Evolution astronomers are frustrated because star measurements say that the stars are older than the red shift measurements say about the universe. So, if the universe is younger than the stars, then the universe had a beginning. This info i got from the Science channel which is evolution run (like most media outlets).
Science really don't know how old the universe is. Their equipment is only so usefull. So if you think science has solved it all, think again and read you bible.

And thats the memo.
__________________

Wei wu wei

Green faeries
Reply With Quote
  #155  
Unread 14th November 2003, 09:16 PM
Regular Member

43 Gender: Male Faith: Christian Country: United States Member For 5 Years
 
Join Date: 24th June 2003
Location: Team America
Posts: 402
Blessings: 169,404
Reps: 10 (power: 0)
FEZZILLA is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by Arikay
1.)Dawkins was right, as you appear to be ignorant about evolution.

2.)Maybe go and learn about it, then try again.

3.)BTW, you should look up what "chewing cud" really means as you got that wrong too.

1.) Dawkins would rather see Julian Huxley's plan to breed out the christians by means of naturalistic education. You call yourself a christian yet support Secular Humanistic ideology...?

2.) I am becoming an expert,..even a master in the knowledge of Evolution. It's you who should study your facts much more carefully.

3.) They've already proven that Rabbits are (by full definition) cud chewing animals. Biology was academically proven wrong (again) by the bible.
You do know that there are several creationist that teach a young earth/universe view, right? This teaching is biblical and more accurate than secular science.
Check out one of my favorite books sometime (its real cheap-$7.00)
Its called "STARLIGHT AND TIME," by D.Russell Humpherys. This book made the bible come alive on me, and now i love watching it breathe
Reply With Quote
  #156  
Unread 14th November 2003, 09:32 PM
Arikay's Avatar
HI

31 Gender: Male Faith: Taoist Country: United States Member For 5 Years
 
Join Date: 23rd January 2003
Posts: 12,645
Blessings: 151,233
Reps: 5,365 (power: 29)
Arikay is a name known to all
Arikay is a name known to allArikay is a name known to allArikay is a name known to allArikay is a name known to allArikay is a name known to allArikay is a name known to allArikay is a name known to allArikay is a name known to allArikay is a name known to allArikay is a name known to allArikay is a name known to allArikay is a name known to allArikay is a name known to all
1) Source please.
and no, I dont call myself a christian.

2) Really now. Give me a basic definition of the theory of evolution. You should be able to do it, right? Nah, I bet you will dodge it like last time.

3)
A)Source please.
IIRC Chewing cud is the action of regurgitating food from a second stomach, and chewing it, Not eating fecal matter.

B) would this be the same Humphery who thought up Polonium halos? The same Humphery that admitted under oath that he faked data? I think ill keep my money.

Originally Posted by FEZZILLA
1.) Dawkins would rather see Julian Huxley's plan to breed out the christians by means of naturalistic education. You call yourself a christian yet support Secular Humanistic ideology...?

2.) I am becoming an expert,..even a master in the knowledge of Evolution. It's you who should study your facts much more carefully.

3.) They've already proven that Rabbits are (by full definition) cud chewing animals. Biology was academically proven wrong (again) by the bible.
You do know that there are several creationist that teach a young earth/universe view, right? This teaching is biblical and more accurate than secular science.
Check out one of my favorite books sometime (its real cheap-$7.00)
Its called "STARLIGHT AND TIME," by D.Russell Humpherys. This book made the bible come alive on me, and now i love watching it breathe
__________________

Wei wu wei

Green faeries
Reply With Quote
  #157  
Unread 14th November 2003, 10:04 PM
Veteran

Gender: Male Faith: Christian Country: Canada Member For 5 Years
 
Join Date: 19th September 2003
Posts: 1,726
Blessings: 149,243
Reps: 207 (power: 0)
Mike Flynn is a jewel in the roughMike Flynn is a jewel in the roughMike Flynn is a jewel in the rough
Welcome back fezz. I see little has changed.

lets look at your post:

Originally Posted by FEZZILLA
TALKING POINTS:

First off, i'd like you all to look up Jeremiah 31:35-37. I think this would enlighten you a little.
Read the whole passage (Jeremiah 31) and then tell us what you think it means. Do you really think it stands against science?


Originally Posted by FEZZILLA
MegaNote: In Matthew 19:4-5 Jesus quotes and acknowleges Gen.1:27 & 2:24 has literal history! This contradicts the Catholic church and Theistic evolution!!
Matthew 19:4-5
And He answered and said, "Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE,
and said, 'FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER AND BE JOINED TO HIS WIFE, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH'?

The first verse says God created them. The second berse says when you get married, you become as one entity before God. If this contradicts theistic evolution, then how? Theistic evolution says 'God created them male and female' as well...and what does marraige have to do with it? In short, there is no text here that disqualifies theistic evolution. As usual Fezz, your interpretations of scriptures are as confused as your contrived interpretations of science. (and I am sorry for being so blunt)

Let me see if I can summarize your efforts here:

1. You have twisted and misinterpreted and even invented false science (burnt dino bones and such) in order to prove your point. Does being a Christian mean being deceitful?

2. You have arrogantly accused Catholics and theistic evolutionists of being anti-Christian. And so, you choose to disrupt and spread chaos in the Body of Christ. Is that your calling for Christ?

3. You have harshly judged others in contradiction to some of the most important principles of being a Christian. Who gave you such authority?

4. You seem intent to spread stumbling blocks out into the church and into the world with your assertion that your interpretation of Genesis is the only valid interpretation of Genesis. In so doing to stand convicted of your own judgements.

The Bible says we can judge if something is good or bad by the fruit that it produces. What good fruit are you producing here fezz? Aren't you supposed to love thy enemy? Aren't you supposed to refrain from judging? Aren't you supposed to have a character of humility and humbleness about your faith? We have seen none of these qualities here.

Insults will not win more people over to Christ Fezz. If you think you are doing God's work with your arguments then I believe you are deceived.

What you believe about Genesis is not about salvation fezz. You should not stand in the way of those who would otherwise accept Christ. Isn't that the real work of the 'enemy'?
Reply With Quote
  #158  
Unread 14th November 2003, 10:17 PM
Veteran

Gender: Male Faith: Christian Country: Canada Member For 5 Years
 
Join Date: 19th September 2003
Posts: 1,726
Blessings: 149,243
Reps: 207 (power: 0)
Mike Flynn is a jewel in the roughMike Flynn is a jewel in the roughMike Flynn is a jewel in the rough
[quote=FEZZILLA]
Originally Posted by Mike Flynn
I missed this little gem.

1. evolution does NOT SAY ETERNAL BEGINNING.



"The cosmos is all that is or ever was or ever will be." ~Carl Sagan

He's considered one of everlutions man-gods.
He said it, not me.
And one man's opinion invalidates evolution? If we adhere to this logic, then the Office of the Inquisition should have wiped out Christianity. What about all of the atrocities that have been done in the name of Christ? Do these people stand as evidence that being Christian is wrong? Of course not.

Here's a hint: you can dig up all of the crazy people who have misinterpreted evolution, or twisted it, or called it anti-god...that doesn't mean evolution is wrong...no more than the Inquisition invalidates Christianity. Does this make sense? If it does, then stop making irrelevant arguments (quoting people, then generalizing to everyone...its WRONG)

Originally Posted by Fezzilla
If you love the lord and trust the lord then you should also trust Him at his word.
Now you are implying that I don't trust God at His word? Another accusation and false judgement. I just don't agree with your interpretation of Genesis. Is not agreeing with fezzilla the same as not agreeing with God?
Reply With Quote
  #159  
Unread 14th November 2003, 10:35 PM
Veteran

Gender: Male Faith: Christian Country: Canada Member For 5 Years
 
Join Date: 19th September 2003
Posts: 1,726
Blessings: 149,243
Reps: 207 (power: 0)
Mike Flynn is a jewel in the roughMike Flynn is a jewel in the roughMike Flynn is a jewel in the rough
Originally Posted by FEZZILLA
MEASURING the stars of the universe. Evolution astronomers are frustrated because star measurements say that the stars are older than the red shift measurements say about the universe. So, if the universe is younger than the stars, then the universe had a beginning.
The universe is younger than the stars? I'm sorry, but cosmology says no such thing. I challenge you to find one legitimate paper that supports your assertions. And please stop telling us the same tired old line: 'The discovery channel told me'. I have 5 years of applied physics education in university that tells me otherwise. Somehow you seem to be the only person who has noticed such stunning revelations and contradictions in cosmology just by watching the discovery channel.

Everytime you talk about science, your ignorance speaks volumes. Humphreys is a creationist astronomer, who has falsified data (IOW lied) to prove his theories. Does that sound like God's work to you?

BTW almost all cosmologists believe the universe had a beginning. Its called the Big Bang. And I believe it just might describe the way God has worked his wonders.

Last edited by Mike Flynn; 14th November 2003 at 11:19 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #160  
Unread 14th November 2003, 11:00 PM
notto's Avatar
Legend

44 Gender: Male Faith: UnitedChurchOfChrist Member For 5 Years
 
Join Date: 31st May 2002
Posts: 11,090
Blessings: 83,941
Reps: 33,621 (power: 57)
notto is a splendid one to beholdnotto is a splendid one to beholdnotto is a splendid one to behold
notto is a splendid one to beholdnotto is a splendid one to beholdnotto is a splendid one to beholdnotto is a splendid one to beholdnotto is a splendid one to beholdnotto is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by FEZZILLA
Evolution astronomers are frustrated because star measurements say that the stars are older than the red shift measurements say about the universe.
That's apparently what happens when you let biologists operate the telescopes. I guess if the astronomers were allowed to use the microscopes, they would tell us that tiny fairies inhabit the cosmos.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Return to Creation & Evolution

Thread Tools
Display Modes


 
Become a CF Site Supporter Today and Make These Ads Go Away!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:50 PM.