Originally Posted by FEZZILLA
I just told you popular evolution teachings, taught on the science channel.
This is the theory you have to defend. How many asteroid theories are you going to use to justify your so-called "fact."
I think you like to argue just to prove to other atheist that you cannot change your view--you are not self-correcting.
And you have to defend yours Fezzilla. It would take an asteroid only 10 miles across to cover the earth's atmosphere with dust. Where are you getting 'the size of russia'? There is such an impact crator located beneath other layers of rock around the yucatan pennisula I think.
Actually, Fezzilla, I am a Christian. If you are as well then I am not sure how you see fit to judge me in your statement. Is that what the Lord calls you to do?
The problem we are having in this discussion can be described this way:
1. You define the science of asteroid impact (without basis or fact).
2. Then you proceed to tell us that your formulations
are falsified in the fossil record.
You are only arguing against *your own formulations*, not the real science ones I'm afraid. This makes everything you have said here somewhat contrived.
IOW you need to debate the ACTUAL asteroid impact theory currently accepted by scientists, not your contrived notion of it.