Creation & EvolutionForum for the discussion of this important topic. This forum is open to non-believers. There is a Christians-only forum in the Christians-only section too.
The debate over the new Florida Science education standards has been closed. The standards were accepted with one revision, the addition of "scientific theory" or similar language to every scientific concept mentioned. (Eg, "scientific theory of evolution". "scientific theory of gravity" etc). It's not overtly creationist language but the obvious target, considering the arguments that were used to put the new language in place, is to allow creationist discussion in the classroom.
Florida Citizens for Science Blog; ATM, they have a running description of the issues being brought up at the public hearing. No announcement of the decision at the time of my OP. http://www.flascience.org/wp/
__________________ On "illegal" immigration: "Give us your poor, your tired, your huddled masses longing to be free..." -The Statue of Liberty
On the alleged connection between Hitler and Atheism:
"For it was by the Will of God that men were made of a certain bodily shape, were given their natures and their faculties." -Hitler, Mein Kampf, Volume II, Chapter X
Danth's Law: "If you have to insist that you've won an internet argument, you've probably lost badly."
Creationists, it does not matter what you call evolution; it is still the same thing. If your arguments have any merit at all, it would be irrelevant as to what people call it.
the concession was inserting "scientific theory of"? i think it gives it more legitimacy if every mention of it mentions that it is the scientific theory of evolution. I just wish they would include that in front of plate tectonics.
__________________ "Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution" - Theodosius Dobzhansky
the concession was inserting "scientific theory of"? i think it gives it more legitimacy if every mention of it mentions that it is the scientific theory of evolution. I just wish they would include that in front of plate tectonics.
Judging from the OP, that is exactly what they did.
. . .the addition of "scientific theory" or similar language to every scientific concept mentioned.
Students should also be taught that "theory" is the highest any idea in science can get, and how "Scientific Law" is a vestige of Baconian science.
__________________ "Since YAC [Young-Age Creation] epistemology accepts Biblical claims over physical evidence and human reason, logical or evidential arguments for evolution and/or against YAC are likely to be ineffective in converting most YACists."--Kurt Wise
You know, I actually do like this as having to refer to all the most respected idea in the scientific would as the "scientific theory" will ruin the use of it as a slur. The scientific theory of relativity.
__________________ Lacking Inactivity
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Next on their agenda, no doubt, is to attack scientists who present Heliocentrism as a fact. Everyone knows it is just a theory.
__________________ "Since YAC [Young-Age Creation] epistemology accepts Biblical claims over physical evidence and human reason, logical or evidential arguments for evolution and/or against YAC are likely to be ineffective in converting most YACists."--Kurt Wise