| Creation & Evolution Forum for the discussion of this important topic. This forum is open to non-believers. There is a Christians-only forum in the Christians-only section too. |  | | 
18th January 2008, 10:51 AM
|  | The kingdom is within 51  | | Join Date: 27th April 2005 Location: West Virginia
Posts: 14,894
Blessings: 80,436 My Mood
Reps: 355,468,475,071,780 (power: 355,468,475,092) | | Originally Posted by dad Not for man, and some things.
There is nothing there to indicate this. It actually says that man should be expelled from the garden lest he reach out and eat from the tree of life and live forever.
So not only does it not say that there was no death for man but it strongly implies that man was mortal all along.
The no death part is made up.
__________________ "What does God need with a starship?" - James T. Kirk | 
18th January 2008, 11:05 AM
|  | SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE 57 
| | Join Date: 18th June 2006 Location: United States
Posts: 2,126,163
Blessings: 2,934,947,661 My Mood
Reps: 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 (power: 9,223,372,036,856,908) | | Originally Posted by Soul Searcher So not only does it not say that there was no death for man but it strongly implies that man was mortal all along.
The no death part is made up.
Let me ask you a question, SS.
Take Adam for instance. Here is a man that is alive both spiritually and physically. Now he dies.
Question: Which, in your opinion, would die first in Adam: his spirit, or his body?
To look at it another way, which is more reasonable: - A body walking around spiritually dead.
- A body lying in the grave spiritually alive.
__________________ GOD SAID IT -- THAT SETTLES IT | 
18th January 2008, 11:10 AM
|  | The kingdom is within 51  | | Join Date: 27th April 2005 Location: West Virginia
Posts: 14,894
Blessings: 80,436 My Mood
Reps: 355,468,475,071,780 (power: 355,468,475,092) | | Originally Posted by AV1611VET Let me ask you a question, SS.
Take Adam for instance. Here is a man that is alive both spiritually and physically. Now he dies.
Question: Which, in your opinion, would die first in Adam: his spirit, or his body?
To look at it another way, which is more reasonable: - A body walking around spiritually dead.
- A body lying in the grave spiritually alive.
His body. If we look elsewhere in the OT we see that the spirit does not die but leaves the body upon physical death.
__________________ "What does God need with a starship?" - James T. Kirk | 
18th January 2008, 11:13 AM
|  | The kingdom is within 51  | | Join Date: 27th April 2005 Location: West Virginia
Posts: 14,894
Blessings: 80,436 My Mood
Reps: 355,468,475,071,780 (power: 355,468,475,092) | | Originally Posted by AV1611VET Let me ask you a question, SS.
Take Adam for instance. Here is a man that is alive both spiritually and physically. Now he dies.
Question: Which, in your opinion, would die first in Adam: his spirit, or his body?
To look at it another way, which is more reasonable: - A body walking around spiritually dead.
- A body lying in the grave spiritually alive.
As to which is more reasonable. I would say that neither is possible. The spirit is the life force of the body. A body can not live without it and will live until it leaves the body.
__________________ "What does God need with a starship?" - James T. Kirk | 
18th January 2008, 11:14 AM
| | Scientist 27 
| | Join Date: 25th January 2007
Posts: 2,450
Blessings: 64,926 My Mood
Reps: 15,652,961,582 (power: 15,652,969) | | Originally Posted by AV1611VET Universal entropy.
like i said you dont want to go there. then again you neither care about science nor the implications of the lack of a 2nd law. we could spout a million basic biological processes that couldnt take place and you'd shrug it off and say "im sure it would" but it wouldnt make the idea any less reasonable to you.
__________________ "Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution" - Theodosius Dobzhansky
Evolution: 3 billion base pairs can't be wrong. | 
18th January 2008, 11:28 AM
|  | SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE 57 
| | Join Date: 18th June 2006 Location: United States
Posts: 2,126,163
Blessings: 2,934,947,661 My Mood
Reps: 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 (power: 9,223,372,036,856,908) | | Originally Posted by CACTUSJACKmankin like i said you dont want to go there.
No --- let's do go there --- I said universal entropy --- or maybe a better term would be macro-entropy, as opposed to micro-entropy.
__________________ GOD SAID IT -- THAT SETTLES IT | 
18th January 2008, 11:42 AM
| | Scientist 27 
| | Join Date: 25th January 2007
Posts: 2,450
Blessings: 64,926 My Mood
Reps: 15,652,961,582 (power: 15,652,969) | | Originally Posted by AV1611VET No --- let's do go there --- I said universal entropy --- or maybe a better term would be macro-entropy, as opposed to micro-entropy.
for the mere act of Eve plucking the fruit from the tree of knowledge, energy was used to send the signals from her brain to her muscles. This energy used up ATP and therefore entropy increases. is this within your macro vs micro entropy?
__________________ "Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution" - Theodosius Dobzhansky
Evolution: 3 billion base pairs can't be wrong. | 
18th January 2008, 11:43 AM
|  | Contributor
 | | Join Date: 9th March 2005 Location: MOUNT HOLLY, NEW JERSEY
Posts: 9,179
Blessings: 116,985
Reps: 18,563,956,112,384,120 (power: 18,563,956,112,400) | | Originally Posted by consol It's now obvious to everyone on this forum that you will say anything and twist everything
in order that it might fit in with your ideas of how your religion should be,
you are a disgrace to the Christian religion. (unless they are ALL like you)
And I don't need to think it through, it's only a story, it's only a story, it's only a story.
(The people who got to you should be locked up)
So what you are really saying, is that people can read it which ever way they want,
and can make it mean what ever they want.
I understand that religion is only in the mind of the believer, and everyone uses it as they see fit,
but the problems start when people begin to believe the bible is true, and think it's fact,
when anyone with 9 cents worth of brain knows it's just a story, and not a story to be taken seriously.
Why does everyone insist on adding or removing or giving different meanings to words in the bible?
do they find it that easy to fool themselves?
I believe you are being personally judgmental and as a "Christian" are not applying GOD 's Word but totally your own values to ridicule and insult.
I do not expect everyone to believe as I do. I do expect everyone who considers themselves "Christian" to place CHRIST first and HIS concerns foremost.
I also feel that the Bible has been misunderstood by people who really have no love of GOD and are not willing to really try to grasp what GOD says in HIS Word, nor the possibilities HE shares throughout HIS Word.
If you insist that GOD made the universe in Billions of years and developed man from a monkey, I see no Biblical interpretation that supports such a claim. If you personally know of one, you owe it to me as a "brother in CHRIST" to point it out to me. If you cannot then do not be so rude as to try to hit me below the belt and belittle my beliefs simply because you are insecure in yours.
I would love to be your friend; however, I do not take kindly to someone trying to remove a splinter from my eye, using anything but BIBLICAL tweezers.
Last edited by LittleNipper; 18th January 2008 at 11:57 AM.
| 
18th January 2008, 11:49 AM
| | Scientist 27 
| | Join Date: 25th January 2007
Posts: 2,450
Blessings: 64,926 My Mood
Reps: 15,652,961,582 (power: 15,652,969) | | Originally Posted by LittleNipper I believe you are being personally judgmental and as a "Christian" are not applying GOD 's Word but totally your own values to ridicule and insult.
I do not expect everyone to believe as I do. I do expect everyone who considers themself a "Christian" to place CHRIST first and HIS concerns foremost.
I also feel that the Bible has been misunderstood by people who really have no love of GOD and are not willing to really try to grasp what GOD says in HIS Word, nor the possibilities HE shares throughout HIS Word.
If you insist that GOD made the universe in Billions of years and developed man from a monkey, I see no Biblical interpretation that supports such a claim. If you personally know of one, you owe it to me as a "brother in CHRIST" to point it out to me. If you cannot then do not be so rude as to try to hit me below the belt and belittle my beliefs simply because you are insecure in yours.
I would love to be your friend; however, I do not take kindly to someone trying to remove a splinter from my eye, using anything but BIBLICAL tweezers.
My interpretation is that genesis is not literal. A literal genesis completely fails even grade school science. stuff like photosynthesis and the solar system. Genesis is the literary origin story. kind of like the first issue of a superhero comic book. without the radioactive spider, spider-man is just some guy randomly able to walk on walls and spin webs. Genesis sets up man's relationship with God and the state of the world.
__________________ "Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution" - Theodosius Dobzhansky
Evolution: 3 billion base pairs can't be wrong. | 
18th January 2008, 11:51 AM
|  | Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 | | Join Date: 9th February 2007 Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,829
Blessings: 57,953 My Mood
Reps: 2,164,740,823,093,743 (power: 2,164,740,823,104) | | Originally Posted by CACTUSJACKmankin My interpretation is that genesis is not literal. A literal genesis completely fails even grade school science. stuff like photosynthesis and the solar system. Genesis is the literary origin story. kind of like the first issue of a superhero comic book. without the radioactive spider, spider-man is just some guy randomly able to walk on walls and spin webs. Genesis sets up man's relationship with God and the state of the world.
I agree Cactus. |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | | | |