Creation & EvolutionForum for the discussion of this important topic. This forum is open to non-believers. There is a Christians-only forum in the Christians-only section too.
Nu Evil Too ('nuff said)
L' Otion Vue (The Ocean View, a hidden advert for a hotel or condo)
U I'l Vote On (why the creationists attack it politically)
Just some ponderings about the word, this came up while going to sleep yesterday.
Ever look at the word backwards?
Evolution No It U Love
Know It, U Love.
I thought that was rather interesting. A hidden message. It's all about Love.
And if we use the German or Spanish word, what happens then?
MQTA, I obviously think this is rather silly. Another reason is that the usage of evolution has changed over the centuries. When Darwin was writing, "evolution" was used as the name of the process we call "embryonic development" today. That is, fetuses "evolved" to become adults. Now, if your anagram is used in that context, what do you make of it?
Also, why change "no" to "know"? If you take the original "no", then wouldn't it support creationists? "no it" == no evolution "u love" = creationism = Christianity?
You can see all the flaws here. Next time, do us a favor and look for the flaws yourself before you post.
I had some other thoughts about evolution and our experience in this life time, but I'm not sure I want to bring that issue up here.
Unless you've tested them much more rigorously in an attempt to show them wrong than you did with this one, it might be best to wait until you have done the testing.
__________________ "If sound science appears to contradict the Bible, we may be sure that it is our interpretation of the Bible that is at fault." Christian Observer, 1832, pg. 437
"Christians should look on evolution simply as the method by which God works." Rev. James McCosh, theologian and President of Princeton, 1890
And if we use the German or Spanish word, what happens then?
MQTA, I obviously think this is rather silly. Another reason is that the usage of evolution has changed over the centuries. When Darwin was writing, "evolution" was used as the name of the process we call "embryonic development" today. That is, fetuses "evolved" to become adults. Now, if your anagram is used in that context, what do you make of it?
Also, why change "no" to "know"? If you take the original "no", then wouldn't it support creationists? "no it" == no evolution "u love" = creationism = Christianity?
You can see all the flaws here. Next time, do us a favor and look for the flaws yourself before you post.
Unless you've tested them much more rigorously in an attempt to show them wrong than you did with this one, it might be best to wait until you have done the testing.
You know, if you weren't such a negative person, perhaps your reputation would be higher.
Linear Mode
