3rd October 2007, 09:15 AM
|
 | Contributor
21      
 | | Join Date: 21st March 2005 Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 9,761
Blessings: 71,161 My Mood 
Reps: 95,624,435,719,773 (power: 95,624,435,733) | |
Originally Posted by gamespotter10  so, if the speed of light were in fact much faster in a vacuum, and it was slowing down, then there would be no change in the energy output of the sun and other stars?
Not without revoking the Energy Conservation Law, no.
__________________ A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, -- a mere heart of stone.
- Charles Darwin
"I am a scientist... when I find evidence that my theories are wrong, it is as exciting as if the evidence proved them right."
- Stargate: SG1
What can be asserted without reason, can be denied without reason.
- Anon "A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything."
- Friedrich Nietzsche |
Linear Mode
