3rd October 2007, 09:15 AM
|
 | Contributor
23      
 | | Join Date: 21st March 2005 Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 15,593
Blessings: 50,320,673 My Mood 
Reps: 273,058,856,457,603,328 (power: 273,058,856,457,625) | |
Originally Posted by gamespotter10  so, if the speed of light were in fact much faster in a vacuum, and it was slowing down, then there would be no change in the energy output of the sun and other stars?
Not without revoking the Energy Conservation Law, no.
__________________ "I am a scientist... when I find evidence that my theories are wrong, it is as exciting as if the evidence proved them right."
- Stargate: SG1
"A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, -- a mere heart of stone."
- Charles Darwin
"What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof."
- Christopher Hitchens
"Protecting the sanctity of marriage against people who want to get married"
- Anonymous
Got a question about science?
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
!
|
Linear Mode
