Anyone want to debate against Wikipedia on Evolution? I know you can edit it, but it changes back. It lists it's sources and what not
For that matter, does anyone want to debate against scientific evidence?
I'm sorry, I don't understand what you're trying to say here.
Are you trying to flood wikipedia, and assume that whatever survives must be true?
Is this not just like spray-paint vandalism on something you don't like?
__________________ "We are all atheists about most of the gods that humanity has ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further." - Professor Richard Dawkins.
"It ain't the parts of the Bible that I can't understand that bother me, it is the parts that I do understand." - Mark Twain
"The inspiration of the bible depends on the ignorance of the person who reads it." - Robert G. Ingersoll
Wikipedia is a good source for a quick glance at understanding something, but a horrible source to dig deeper into information. I bet even the moderators don't fully understand evolution, only very expert scientists in the field.
Wikipedia is a good source for a quick glance at understanding something, but a horrible source to dig deeper into information. I bet even the moderators don't fully understand evolution, only very expert scientists in the field.
That is why the creation movement still survives, people on whole are stupid and when a guy in a lab coat uses big words we assume he is right. I mean how well would one of the creation seminars go if every 30 seconds someone was correcting the speaker?
The Evolution article on Wikipedia is at least so much better than the one on Conservapedia which is just a giant Creationism suckup fest, the entire article does not contain a single shred of evidence for Evolution - Just a lot of text of Creationists tooting their own horn and criticizing Evolution.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.