Home | Be a Christian | Devotionals | Join Us! | Forums | Rules | F.A.Q.


Go Back   Christian Forums > Society > Society > Physical & Life Sciences > Creation & Evolution > Creation/Evolution Formal Debates
Register BlogsPrayersJobsArcade Calendar Mark Forums Read

Creation/Evolution Formal Debates The formal debate forum for creation vs evolution. Please follow FORMAL DEBATE rules.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 9th September 2007, 08:11 AM
Newbie

24 Gender: Male Faith: Christian Member For 4 Years
 
Join Date: 9th September 2007
Posts: 13
Blessings: 90,368
Reps: 119 (power: 0)
DaSwuush has a spectacular aura aboutDaSwuush has a spectacular aura about
Wikipedia - Evolution

Anyone want to debate against Wikipedia on Evolution? I know you can edit it, but it changes back. It lists it's sources and what not

For that matter, does anyone want to debate against scientific evidence?
Become a CF Site Supporter Today and Make These Ads Go Away!

  #2  
Old 9th September 2007, 08:51 AM
Wiccan_Child's Avatar
Contributor

23 Gender: Male Faith: Atheist Party: UK-Liberal-Democrats Country: United Kingdom Member For 5 Years Commander
View Profile Pic
 
Join Date: 21st March 2005
Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 15,584
Blessings: 50,320,545
My Mood Mellow
Reps: 273,058,856,457,603,328 (power: 273,058,856,457,625)
Wiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond repute
Wiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond reputeWiccan_Child has a reputation beyond repute
Against scientific evidence?
__________________
"I am a scientist... when I find evidence that my theories are wrong, it is as exciting as if the evidence proved them right."
- Stargate: SG1

"A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, -- a mere heart of stone."
- Charles Darwin

"What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof."
- Christopher Hitchens

"Protecting the sanctity of marriage against people who want to get married"
- Anonymous

Got a question about science?
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
!

  #3  
Old 9th September 2007, 04:23 PM
NailsII's Avatar
Life-long student of biological science

38 Gender: Male Married Faith: Atheist Country: England Member For 4 Years
View Profile Pic
 
Join Date: 25th July 2007
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 1,159
Blessings: 90,337
My Mood Cheerful
Reps: 102,139 (power: 108)
NailsII has much to be proud ofNailsII has much to be proud ofNailsII has much to be proud ofNailsII has much to be proud ofNailsII has much to be proud ofNailsII has much to be proud of
NailsII has much to be proud ofNailsII has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by DaSwuush View Post
Anyone want to debate against Wikipedia on Evolution? I know you can edit it, but it changes back. It lists it's sources and what not

For that matter, does anyone want to debate against scientific evidence?
I'm sorry, I don't understand what you're trying to say here.
Are you trying to flood wikipedia, and assume that whatever survives must be true?
Is this not just like spray-paint vandalism on something you don't like?
__________________
"We are all atheists about most of the gods that humanity has ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further." - Professor Richard Dawkins.

"It ain't the parts of the Bible that I can't understand that bother me, it is the parts that I do understand." - Mark Twain

"The inspiration of the bible depends on the ignorance of the person who reads it." - Robert G. Ingersoll
  #4  
Old 23rd March 2009, 08:51 PM
Regular Member

Gender: Male Faith: Christian Party: US-Republican Country: United States Member For 4 Years
View Profile Pic
 
Join Date: 26th September 2007
Posts: 562
Blessings: 63,435
Reps: 136,963 (power: 141)
RyanLeeParis has disabled reputation
Wikipedia is a good source for a quick glance at understanding something, but a horrible source to dig deeper into information. I bet even the moderators don't fully understand evolution, only very expert scientists in the field.
  #5  
Old 24th March 2009, 06:31 PM
Veteran

26 Gender: Male Married Faith: Christian-Seeker Party: US-Libertarian Country: United States Member For 3 Years
 
Join Date: 7th October 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,165
Blessings: 107,953
Reps: 1,188,680,998 (power: 0)
Matthewj1985 has a reputation beyond reputeMatthewj1985 has a reputation beyond reputeMatthewj1985 has a reputation beyond reputeMatthewj1985 has a reputation beyond reputeMatthewj1985 has a reputation beyond reputeMatthewj1985 has a reputation beyond reputeMatthewj1985 has a reputation beyond reputeMatthewj1985 has a reputation beyond reputeMatthewj1985 has a reputation beyond reputeMatthewj1985 has a reputation beyond reputeMatthewj1985 has a reputation beyond reputeMatthewj1985 has a reputation beyond reputeMatthewj1985 has a reputation beyond reputeMatthewj1985 has a reputation beyond reputeMatthewj1985 has a reputation beyond repute
Matthewj1985 has a reputation beyond reputeMatthewj1985 has a reputation beyond reputeMatthewj1985 has a reputation beyond reputeMatthewj1985 has a reputation beyond reputeMatthewj1985 has a reputation beyond reputeMatthewj1985 has a reputation beyond reputeMatthewj1985 has a reputation beyond reputeMatthewj1985 has a reputation beyond reputeMatthewj1985 has a reputation beyond reputeMatthewj1985 has a reputation beyond reputeMatthewj1985 has a reputation beyond reputeMatthewj1985 has a reputation beyond reputeMatthewj1985 has a reputation beyond reputeMatthewj1985 has a reputation beyond reputeMatthewj1985 has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by RyanLeeParis View Post
Wikipedia is a good source for a quick glance at understanding something, but a horrible source to dig deeper into information. I bet even the moderators don't fully understand evolution, only very expert scientists in the field.
That is why the creation movement still survives, people on whole are stupid and when a guy in a lab coat uses big words we assume he is right. I mean how well would one of the creation seminars go if every 30 seconds someone was correcting the speaker?
  #6  
Old 18th May 2009, 10:54 AM
It's comforting to know that this isn't a test

22 Gender: Male Faith: Atheist Member For 4 Years
 
Join Date: 14th May 2007
Posts: 858
Blessings: 53,592
Reps: 2,095,570 (power: 2,100)
Atheuz has a brilliant futureAtheuz has a brilliant futureAtheuz has a brilliant futureAtheuz has a brilliant futureAtheuz has a brilliant futureAtheuz has a brilliant futureAtheuz has a brilliant futureAtheuz has a brilliant futureAtheuz has a brilliant futureAtheuz has a brilliant futureAtheuz has a brilliant futureAtheuz has a brilliant futureAtheuz has a brilliant futureAtheuz has a brilliant futureAtheuz has a brilliant future
Atheuz has a brilliant futureAtheuz has a brilliant futureAtheuz has a brilliant futureAtheuz has a brilliant futureAtheuz has a brilliant futureAtheuz has a brilliant futureAtheuz has a brilliant futureAtheuz has a brilliant futureAtheuz has a brilliant futureAtheuz has a brilliant futureAtheuz has a brilliant futureAtheuz has a brilliant futureAtheuz has a brilliant futureAtheuz has a brilliant futureAtheuz has a brilliant future
The Evolution article on Wikipedia is at least so much better than the one on Conservapedia which is just a giant Creationism suckup fest, the entire article does not contain a single shred of evidence for Evolution - Just a lot of text of Creationists tooting their own horn and criticizing Evolution.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
  #7  
Old 2nd July 2009, 10:48 AM
DaisyDay's Avatar
blind squirrel

Gender: Female Married Faith: Unitarian Member For 5 Years
View Profile Pic
 
Join Date: 7th January 2003
Posts: 10,594
Blessings: 2,209,266
Reps: 420,956,954,470,510,592 (power: 420,956,954,470,530)
DaisyDay has a reputation beyond reputeDaisyDay has a reputation beyond reputeDaisyDay has a reputation beyond reputeDaisyDay has a reputation beyond reputeDaisyDay has a reputation beyond reputeDaisyDay has a reputation beyond reputeDaisyDay has a reputation beyond reputeDaisyDay has a reputation beyond reputeDaisyDay has a reputation beyond reputeDaisyDay has a reputation beyond reputeDaisyDay has a reputation beyond reputeDaisyDay has a reputation beyond reputeDaisyDay has a reputation beyond reputeDaisyDay has a reputation beyond reputeDaisyDay has a reputation beyond repute
DaisyDay has a reputation beyond reputeDaisyDay has a reputation beyond reputeDaisyDay has a reputation beyond reputeDaisyDay has a reputation beyond reputeDaisyDay has a reputation beyond reputeDaisyDay has a reputation beyond reputeDaisyDay has a reputation beyond reputeDaisyDay has a reputation beyond reputeDaisyDay has a reputation beyond reputeDaisyDay has a reputation beyond reputeDaisyDay has a reputation beyond reputeDaisyDay has a reputation beyond reputeDaisyDay has a reputation beyond reputeDaisyDay has a reputation beyond reputeDaisyDay has a reputation beyond repute
Wikipedia is good for quick info; read & follow the footnotes/links for more depth.
__________________
- Daisy

If such people were amenable to facts, they would have gotten the point long ago...Whatever it is that is blocking the understanding of the "denialist", it is not access to facts or information. The blockage is most likely emotional, possibly based on fear, and one does not most effectively deal with emotional barriers by using facts as instruments of assault and battery. - Dan Murphy
Closed Thread


Return to Creation/Evolution Formal Debates

Thread Tools
Display Modes


 
Become a CF Site Supporter Today and Make These Ads Go Away!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:55 AM.