Darwinism is pseudoscience ,why some people believe it ?

Another page from your link. It's a doozy!
http://www.fixedearth.com/

The Frumious Bandersnatch

Hmm.. That doesn't sound right. Give me a link.

Hmm.. That doesn't sound right. Give me a link.

Where do YECs dig up this nonsense? Do they sit around saying what fact of history or science can we totally distort today to make evolution look bad?

The Soviets rejected Darwinism because survival of the fittest didn't meet with their Marxist Ideals. They even rejected Mendalian genetics for Lamarkism under the influence of Lysenko a Soviet peasant who destroyed Soviet Biological Science and wrecked their agricultural production. Lysenko was supported wholeheartedly by Stalin and later by Khruschev at least for a while. Stalin murdered people because he was a viscious dictator who maintained his power through terror. It had nothing to do with Darwin. I gave one link but you can read about this in many places. It is very well known. To me this just looks like AiG and other creationist sites counting on the ignorance of their followers.

I'll bet that Stalin believed in Gravity and exploited it to throw bodies in holes and bury them. Better stop believing in that evil theory of gravity right away.

The Frumious Bandersnatch

Without a link, I'd say this was a perfectly executed straw man argument. At least quote the sources provided at the bottom of that link.

And I'm not a YEC'er, either.

So it is very relevant that a young Bolshevik named Stalin had written in 1906 that neo-Lamarckianism was supplanting neo-Darwinism and that this proved once more that the Engelsian law of the dialectical transformation of quality was correct (Coulter, p. l50).

But there is good evidence that STALIN supported Lamarckian ideas and believed in them. In his 1906 article "Anarchism or Socialism?" analyzed the late 19th century debates between neo-Lamarckians (probably he had Herbert Spencer in mind) and the so-called neo-Darwinians (Weismann and others). Stalin sided with the neo-Lamarckians. This 1906 article was republished in 1947, in Stalin's collected works.

In Stalin's view, Lysenko had to sharpen his criticism of Weismann and his theory. He wrote in the margins: "Weismann?" As a result, Lysenko added several paragraphs to his speech criticizing Weismannism.

I gave this link above
http://skepdic.com/lysenko.html
Here are a couple more.
http://evonet.sdsc.edu/evoscisociety...om_history.htm
http://www.marxists.org/subject/scie...says/young.htm
http://eserver.org/cyber/stalin.txt

At a very early age, while still a pupil in the ecclesiastical school, Comrade Stalin developed a critical mind and revolutionary sentiments. He began to read Darwin and became an atheist.


G. Glurdjidze, a boyhood friend of Stalin's, relates:
"I began to speak of God, Joseph heard me out, and after a moment's silence, said:
"'You know, they are fooling us, there is no God. . . .'
"I was astonished at these words, I had never heard anything like it before.
"'How can you say such things, Soso?' I exclaimed.
"'I'll lend you a book to read; it will show you that the world and all living things are quite different from what you imagine, and all this talk about God is sheer nonsense,' Joseph said.
"'What book is that?' I enquired.
"'Darwin. You must read it,' Joseph impressed on me" 1

A few pages later, another individual--also reflecting on Stalin's youthful pursuits, added the following:

". . .in order to disabuse the minds of our seminary students of the myth that the world was created in six days, we had to acquaint ourselves with the geological origin and age of the earth, and be able to prove them in argument; we had to familiarize ourselves with Darwin's teachings."1

Wouldn't it be more of a positive step to find something constructive to refute it?