| Creation & Evolution Forum for the discussion of this important topic. This forum is open to non-believers. There is a Christians-only forum in the Christians-only section too. |  | | 
30th August 2003, 03:34 AM
|  | WinAce > cdesign proponentsists 33 
| | Join Date: 24th June 2003 Location: Chiark
Posts: 18,443
Blessings: 143,303
Reps: 16,712 (power: 44) | | | natural processes john, natural processes.
__________________ MSci MSc ARCS DIC PhD..... yes, I am bragging. | 
30th August 2003, 04:41 AM
|  | Legend 61 
| | Join Date: 9th February 2002 Location: Ohio
Posts: 25,410
Blessings: 241,163
Reps: 12,682 (power: 0) | | Originally Posted by Pete Harcoff Within the philosophical contraints of science, scientists can most certainly prove the Earth is ~4.5 billion years old.
Yes, if "contraints" means that you assume that their assumptions are based on fact and not fiction or creative writting. ie. (imagination) | 
30th August 2003, 04:54 AM
|  | WinAce > cdesign proponentsists 33 
| | Join Date: 24th June 2003 Location: Chiark
Posts: 18,443
Blessings: 143,303
Reps: 16,712 (power: 44) | | | you clearly don't understand what pete just said john.
__________________ MSci MSc ARCS DIC PhD..... yes, I am bragging. | 
30th August 2003, 08:23 AM
|  | Legend 61 
| | Join Date: 9th February 2002 Location: Ohio
Posts: 25,410
Blessings: 241,163
Reps: 12,682 (power: 0) | | Originally Posted by Jet Black you clearly don't understand what pete just said john.
It does not matter, the point of the thread is that one of the most common things I hear on here is how easy it is to falsify Dr. Dino. So here is everyone's chance to falsify one of the articals on his site. | 
30th August 2003, 08:31 AM
|  | Senior Member 50  | | Join Date: 13th July 2003 Location: Thayer Missouri
Posts: 633
Blessings: 108,400
Reps: 14 (power: 0) | | | There is not even the remorest of remote chance's that the Evolutionists can PROVethe earth is any age let alone 4.5 billions of years old. For heavens sake they themselves have changed their own estimates & theories somany times it is an absolute absurdity to put any credibility in their abilities to do anything but imagine another tall tale of one sort or another. | 
30th August 2003, 08:36 AM
|  | Senior Member 50  | | Join Date: 13th July 2003 Location: Thayer Missouri
Posts: 633
Blessings: 108,400
Reps: 14 (power: 0) | | | Did U hear that dwebate last nite? Hovind just blew them right out of thewater! | 
30th August 2003, 08:41 AM
|  | WinAce > cdesign proponentsists 33 
| | Join Date: 24th June 2003 Location: Chiark
Posts: 18,443
Blessings: 143,303
Reps: 16,712 (power: 44) | | ok.
lets have a look at polystrate fossils:
they are a well understood geological phenomenon, which I am not going to outline right now: http://drdino.com/cse.asp?pg=articles&specific=16
ok, he suggests that polystrate fossils are a result of noah's flood. However this is ludicrous, because the 2nd picture outlines a 27 layer polystrate fossil layer, meaning that 27 generations of trees would have had to grow, in less than a year, while several kilometres underwater and being simultaneously compacted into sedimentary rock.
__________________ MSci MSc ARCS DIC PhD..... yes, I am bragging. | 
30th August 2003, 08:50 AM
|  | Senior Member 50  | | Join Date: 13th July 2003 Location: Thayer Missouri
Posts: 633
Blessings: 108,400
Reps: 14 (power: 0) | | | You is silly. Them trees are standing thru multiple layers of stata which PROVES they did not grow thru them & that it did not take millions of years to form the strata. The flood did it!! | 
30th August 2003, 09:00 AM
|  | WinAce > cdesign proponentsists 33 
| | Join Date: 24th June 2003 Location: Chiark
Posts: 18,443
Blessings: 143,303
Reps: 16,712 (power: 44) | | | how do you suppose that they crew in multiple layers though? they would have had to be under several miles of water, and growing extremely quickly, then dying extremely quickly before another tree germinated, grew extremely quickly and died extremelz quickly, and another, and another. and so on. there are 27 layers there.... lets say 24, that is 2 layers per month, or one every 2 weeks. are you telling me that trees can grow from seeds to full sized trees in under 2 weeks, while under 5 miles of water at the same time as millions of sand is pouring down on them, in the greatest deluge known to mankind?
__________________ MSci MSc ARCS DIC PhD..... yes, I am bragging. | 
30th August 2003, 09:02 AM
|  | WinAce > cdesign proponentsists 33 
| | Join Date: 24th June 2003 Location: Chiark
Posts: 18,443
Blessings: 143,303
Reps: 16,712 (power: 44) | | | say each tree was 28 feet high, that is a growth rate of 2 feet per day. not even bamboo grows that quickly.
__________________ MSci MSc ARCS DIC PhD..... yes, I am bragging. |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | | | |