| Creationism The subforum for young-earth and other creationist members. |
 | | 
13th December 2008, 02:49 AM
| | | The entire video "Darwin's Deadly Legacy", in seven parts:
__________________
"Biological arguments for racism may have been common before 1859, but they increased by orders of magnitude following the acceptance of evolutionary theory. The litany is familiar: cold, dispassionate, objective, modern science shows us that races can be ranked on a scale of superiority. If this offends Christian morality or a sentimental belief in human unity, so be it; science must be free to proclaim unpleasant truths."
Stephen Jay Gould
"Ontogeny and Phylogeny", Harvard University Press |
13th December 2008, 03:33 AM
| | | The entire video "The Case for a Creator", in six parts:
__________________
"Biological arguments for racism may have been common before 1859, but they increased by orders of magnitude following the acceptance of evolutionary theory. The litany is familiar: cold, dispassionate, objective, modern science shows us that races can be ranked on a scale of superiority. If this offends Christian morality or a sentimental belief in human unity, so be it; science must be free to proclaim unpleasant truths."
Stephen Jay Gould
"Ontogeny and Phylogeny", Harvard University Press |
13th December 2008, 03:56 AM
| | | |
__________________
"Biological arguments for racism may have been common before 1859, but they increased by orders of magnitude following the acceptance of evolutionary theory. The litany is familiar: cold, dispassionate, objective, modern science shows us that races can be ranked on a scale of superiority. If this offends Christian morality or a sentimental belief in human unity, so be it; science must be free to proclaim unpleasant truths."
Stephen Jay Gould
"Ontogeny and Phylogeny", Harvard University Press |
13th December 2008, 03:59 AM
| | | |
__________________
"Biological arguments for racism may have been common before 1859, but they increased by orders of magnitude following the acceptance of evolutionary theory. The litany is familiar: cold, dispassionate, objective, modern science shows us that races can be ranked on a scale of superiority. If this offends Christian morality or a sentimental belief in human unity, so be it; science must be free to proclaim unpleasant truths."
Stephen Jay Gould
"Ontogeny and Phylogeny", Harvard University Press |
13th December 2008, 04:14 AM
| | | Entire online book---"The Creation Answers Book": http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/4018/
__________________
"Biological arguments for racism may have been common before 1859, but they increased by orders of magnitude following the acceptance of evolutionary theory. The litany is familiar: cold, dispassionate, objective, modern science shows us that races can be ranked on a scale of superiority. If this offends Christian morality or a sentimental belief in human unity, so be it; science must be free to proclaim unpleasant truths."
Stephen Jay Gould
"Ontogeny and Phylogeny", Harvard University Press |
13th December 2008, 04:20 AM
| | | |
__________________
"Biological arguments for racism may have been common before 1859, but they increased by orders of magnitude following the acceptance of evolutionary theory. The litany is familiar: cold, dispassionate, objective, modern science shows us that races can be ranked on a scale of superiority. If this offends Christian morality or a sentimental belief in human unity, so be it; science must be free to proclaim unpleasant truths."
Stephen Jay Gould
"Ontogeny and Phylogeny", Harvard University Press
Last edited by Christian Soldier; 13th December 2008 at 04:29 AM.
|
13th December 2008, 04:31 AM
| | | |
__________________
"Biological arguments for racism may have been common before 1859, but they increased by orders of magnitude following the acceptance of evolutionary theory. The litany is familiar: cold, dispassionate, objective, modern science shows us that races can be ranked on a scale of superiority. If this offends Christian morality or a sentimental belief in human unity, so be it; science must be free to proclaim unpleasant truths."
Stephen Jay Gould
"Ontogeny and Phylogeny", Harvard University Press |
16th January 2009, 02:00 AM
| | Junior Member
    
| | Join Date: 23rd September 2008 Location: Gresham, OR USA
Posts: 1,100
Blessings: 56,401 My Mood 
Reps: 16,521,278,994,214,560 (power: 16,521,278,994,219) | | | Endogenous Retroviruses - ERV's
Explains why ERV's are not proof of twin nested hierarchy as assumed
by Darwinian Evolutionary Biologists who wrongfully assert that Homo
sapiens share common ancestry with Pan troglodytes:
by Dr. Yingguang http://www.answersingenesis.org/arti...s-created-good The Natural History of Retroviruses http://www.answersingenesis.org/arti...endogenization
Last edited by Breckmin; 24th December 2009 at 12:00 AM.
Reason: Add Natural History link
|
16th January 2009, 03:12 AM
| | Junior Member
| | Join Date: 23rd September 2008 Location: Gresham, OR USA
Posts: 1,100
Blessings: 56,401 My Mood
Reps: 16,521,278,994,214,560 (power: 16,521,278,994,219) | | | Human Chromosone 2
Problems with Telomere to Telomere fusion to form Human
Chromosone 2: http://www.answersingenesis.org/arti...wo-chromosomes
by J.K. Lightner
Chimp-human hybridization: 2006 Patterson study: http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs...31chimp.asp#n4
by Dr. David A. DeWitt
Last edited by Breckmin; 17th January 2009 at 09:32 PM.
Reason: dewitt addition
|
16th January 2009, 03:58 AM
| | Junior Member
| | Join Date: 23rd September 2008 Location: Gresham, OR USA
Posts: 1,100
Blessings: 56,401 My Mood
Reps: 16,521,278,994,214,560 (power: 16,521,278,994,219) | |  The Science Fiction of Abiogenesis
Absurdity of abiogenesis: http://www.trueorigin.org/abio.asp
Jerry Bergman http://www.trueorigin.org/originoflife.asp
Jonathan Sarfati http://www.icr.org/article/49/
David Rosevear
The last one is a very good article. | | |
| Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
| | |
