Yep, for the whole of March, I'm only going to accept the Creation Science evidence as being factually correct.
I'd rather you stick to what you sincerely believe to be true. You need not pretend to believe what we believe for a month. Just so as long as you're saved, that's all that matters.
I'd rather you stick to what you sincerely believe to be true. You need not pretend to believe what we believe for a month. Just so as long as you're saved, that's all that matters.
I;m not pretending... think of it more as a willing suspension of my pre-conceptions
I;m not pretending... think of it more as a willing suspension of my pre-conceptions
For a fun romp in a more literal Bible interpretational methodology, you might check out Chuck Missler's teaching in Genesis. (khouse.org)
Its related in that YEC really stands as a unified methodology of accepting Scripture as authoritative and believing God is consistent in His revealing of Himself -- both through Scripture and through nature.
__________________ Therefore Pilate said to Him, "So You are a king?" Jesus answered, "You say {correctly} that I am a king. For this I have been born, and for this I have come into the world, to testify to the truth. Everyone who is of the truth hears My voice."
John 18:37 (NASB)
Men should be judged, not by the tint of their skin, the Gods they serve, the Vintage that they drink, nor by the way they fight, or love, or sin, but by the quality of the thought they think.
--Laurence Hope
Warriors dance along a knife edge, maintaining the balance of their totality...celebrating strength while keeping it rigidly under control, only bringing it to bear when it is appropriate and unavoidable.
Be careful how you ask the question. She certainly isn't a young earth creation. Her other posts in other forums reveal much more.
We know she believes in a Big Bang and billions of years by this post.
She implies in this post that she believes dinosaurs and birds have a common ancestor which is a mistruth that many evolutionists repeat.
She also seems to think life can come from nonlife in this post even though this idea was proven wrong a long time ago.
I could go on with more posts from her but I think this is more then enough evidence to show that she shouldn't be posting in this forum unless it is a 100% fellowship post.
Am I allowed to start making assumptions and statements about what Project 86 believes in? I think his dedication to previously debunked strawmen, is actually evidence that he is an evolutionist here under false pretences, trying to make serious creationists look bad by association... that while we wish to deal in hard science, he only wants to produce tired, out dated, and silly claims... lets call them the 3 foolish men... Nebraska man, Piltdown Man, and Straw Man...
Linear Mode
